Democrats just want a dictator

Originally posted by Robtard
It would be a bonus added to a UHC system, not necessarily a requirement. Both can exist.

Fat shamming is already a thing, has been for a very long time. Bad faith argument, that.

Are you arguing there isn't a fat empowerment movement or that Tess holiday is on magazine covers ? Yes or no.

Originally posted by Robtard
No one really cares :/

Apathy is a common response to things one doesn't understand. That's okay if you feel that way.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Are you arguing there isn't a fat empowerment movement or that Tess holiday is on magazine covers ? Yes or no.

I'm saying that fat-shaming is still a thing, even if the occasional plus-sized model happens to make a name for themselves. You're aware of this, but shit posting.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Apathy is a common response to things one doesn't understand. That's okay if you feel that way.

This is low energy bait, ziggy

Originally posted by Robtard
This is low energy bait, ziggy

I thought it was pretty low energy to say no one cares.

Do you understand the difference between positive and negative rights ?

Originally posted by Robtard
I'm saying that fat-shaming is still a thing, even if the occasional plus-sized model happens to make a name for themselves. You're aware of this, but shit posting.

I never said fat shaming has completely Disappeared off the face or the earth as I'm currently exemplifying with my comments.

Tess holiday isn't the only day model.

Adele and rebel Wilson got shamed for losing weight.

I would appreciate if you quit trying to mind read, talk about arguing in bad faith.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yup

Originally posted by Newjak
It's also similar to how they want to talk about how gun laws in Chicago don't work and that shows guns don't work at all. Yet they also don't mention that most of the guns used in gun related crime in Chicago are purchased legally in Indiana because it has lax gun control laws.

Whoa, you mean immoral people find ways around laws ? This is news to me.

Originally posted by Newjak
It's also similar to how they want to talk about how gun laws in Chicago don't work and that shows guns don't work at all. Yet they also don't mention that most of the guns used in gun related crime in Chicago are purchased legally in Indiana because it has lax gun control laws.

So if they're buying guns elsewhere and bringing them, in spite of Chicagos' gun laws, what good are they?

Either way black people are 13-14 percent of the population and commit 50 percent of the violent crimes. Don't think that's related to gun laws.

Originally posted by Klaw
So if they're buying guns elsewhere and bringing them, in spite of Chicagos' gun laws, what good are they?

👆

Originally posted by ilikecomics
👆

Newjak just proved our points.

But he won't be smart enough to realize it.

Originally posted by Klaw
Newjak just proved our points.

But he won't be smart enough to realize it.

The right argues prohibition is bad, but people make moonshine in their basement !!!!!!!!!!

If anything, there are too many laws on the books.

Originally posted by Klaw
So if they're buying guns elsewhere and bringing them, in spite of Chicagos' gun laws, what good are they?

Originally posted by Klaw
If anything, there are too many laws on the books.

All legislation should be eradicated and replaced with natural law, leading to a spontaneous ordering of society.

I can't think of a single good piece of legislation.

Originally posted by Klaw
Newjak just proved our points.

But he won't be smart enough to realize it.

Originally posted by Newjak
😂 😆 😂 😆

Told ya.

I think Chicago should pass 100 more gun control laws.

At that point, people are sure to listen.

Originally posted by Klaw
Told ya.

Mocking arrogance is usually a sign that they're all out of convincing arguments.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Mocking arrogance is usually a sign that they're all out of convincing arguments.

All Newjak does is laugh at peoples' posts.

It's all he has.