Biden's Historic Infrastructure Bill - What's Inside

Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill Passes: Here’s What’s In Biden’s $1 Trillion Bill

The House of Representatives has finally voted to approve the $1 trillion infrastructure bill that the Senate passed in August. It’\'s the biggest infrastructure bill to clear Congress since 2015. President Joe Biden is expected to sign the bill, known as the INVEST in America Act, into law this week.

Votes for the bill, which includes $550 billion in new spending, fell mostly along party lines, with only 13 Republican representatives in favor. -snip

Here are the major elements of the package:

[list]
[*]$110 billion for building and repairing bridges and roads
[*]$39 billion to modernize and improve access to public transit, including replacing buses with zero-emission models
[*]$66 billion to revitalize passenger and freight rail, including updates to the Northeast Corridor
[*]$25 billion to improve airport runways, gates and terminals along with air traffic controls towers
[*]$7.5 billion to build a national network of charging stations for electric vehicles
[*]$5 billion to replace school buses with low- or no-emission options
[*]$1 billion for planning street grids, parks, or other infrastructure to connect communities divided by highway systems
[*]$42 billion to modernize ports and airports
[*]$50 billion for weatherization, drought protection and other climate resiliency efforts
[*]$55 billion to replace lead service lines and provide clean drinking water
[*]$65 billion to increase access to reliable high-speed internet service
[*]$21 billion to clean up industrial waste sites
[*]$65 billion to update power grids[/list]

Another win for Biden's admin and America. That's a whole lot of great for Americans and jobs coming to Americans. The GOP as expected are by and large mad.

Where will these billions of dollars come from ?

*yawn* Biden is still worst potus in American history. This massive spending bill doesn't change that. On the contrary, it is yet more proof that he is. 😉

Thanks for proving my point, Trumpers 👆

Americans are going to benefit from this, there's going to be a massive surge of jobs and sorely needed improvements to the country that the previous admin promised, but utterly failed to deliver. "We're going to have new everything!" -2017

You just want another free handout while you sit at home masturbating and eating potato chips.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Where will these billions of dollars come from ?

You don't care how it will be paid for ?

So odd when Trump was in office, it was spend, spend, spend, doesn't matter who's gonna pay. Tax cuts for the wealthiest people, not a problem. Now the concern over potential spending is foremost. Hmmm...

I'm so happy the prospect of a massive job influx in the very near future has Trumpers shitting themselves.

I said on here over a decade ago that the US should've embarked on huge infrastructure spending in the wake of the economic crash of 2008 because it's a tried and tested method of getting out of economic recession and would help future proof their economy. Its one of the few things Demoncrats and Republicans have generally agreed on yet petty partisanship on both sides has stifled it for years to the detriment of the American people.

Many of those spending plans are exactly what I said money should have been getting spent on. Specifically road, rail and high speed Internet.

Obviously other things have happened in the interim that also needed addressed like the power grid issue as shown in Texas and climate resilience as shown by Miami's dry day flooding.

I also previously mentioned the superfund sites too.

You should let me be President cos I'm way ahead of your shitty politicians

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Socialists like robbie thinks money grows on trees. 😂

Originally posted by Robtard
So odd when Trump was in office, it was spend, spend, spend, doesn't matter who's gonna pay. Tax cuts for the wealthiest people, not a problem. Now the concern over potential spending is foremost. Hmmm...

I'm so happy the prospect of a massive job influx in the very near future has Trumpers shitting themselves.

I'm not pro Trump and never was. He added more to the national debt than Obama. I've said this multiple times and refuse to believe that I don't believe the station of the presidency, or any state action is legitimate whatsoever.

Originally posted by Blakemore
Aren't dollars made out of paper?

Yes, and without being backed by gold are only held up via decree through violence.
When you support Fiat currency, you support war.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
You don't care how it will be paid for ?

Taxes pay for just about everything, that's how the country works and you know this, so you're truing to engage in a bad faith argument yet again.

But there's more to it than that. It's partially already paid for: Senators Claim Infrastructure Bill Is ‘Paid For’; Experts Disagree

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I said on here over a decade ago that the US should've embarked on huge infrastructure spending in the wake of the economic crash of 2008 because it's a tried and tested method of getting out of economic recession and would help future proof their economy. Its one of the few things Demoncrats and Republicans have generally agreed on yet petty partisanship on both sides has stifled it for years to the detriment of the American people.

Many of those spending plans are exactly what I said money should have been getting spent on. Specifically road, rail and high speed Internet.

Obviously other things have happened in the interim that also needed addressed like the power grid issue as shown in Texas and climate resilience as shown by Miami's dry day flooding.

I also previously mentioned the superfund sites too.

You should let me be President cos I'm way ahead of your shitty politicians

Is superfund like crowd sourcing or something different ?

Originally posted by ilikecomics
I'm not pro Trump and never was. He added more to the national debt than Obama. I've said this multiple times and refuse to believe that I don't believe the station of the presidency, or any state action is legitimate whatsoever.

You're lying again, you were a Trumper until he lost.

I'm aware taxes pay for state action, the same way slavery used to. Did that make slavery moral and legitimate ?

Originally posted by Robtard
You're lying again, you were for on a Trumper until he lost.

No I wasn't lol I've always hated Trump. Before I was an an cap I was a big Sam Harris fan and agreed that Trump was a buffoon. I even used to talk about how Trump is a Russian agent and shared the wiki for Aleksandr dugin's book "foundation of geopolitics".

Originally posted by ilikecomics
I'm aware taxes pay for state action, the same way slavery used to. Did that make slavery moral and legitimate ?

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I said on here over a decade ago that the US should've embarked on huge infrastructure spending in the wake of the economic crash of 2008 because it's a tried and tested method of getting out of economic recession and would help future proof their economy. Its one of the few things Demoncrats and Republicans have generally agreed on yet petty partisanship on both sides has stifled it for years to the detriment of the American people.

Many of those spending plans are exactly what I said money should have been getting spent on. Specifically road, rail and high speed Internet.

Obviously other things have happened in the interim that also needed addressed like the power grid issue as shown in Texas and climate resilience as shown by Miami's dry day flooding.

I also previously mentioned the superfund sites too.

You should let me be President cos I'm way ahead of your shitty politicians

I recall the conversation and yes you were.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
I'm aware taxes pay for state action, the same way slavery used to. Did that make slavery moral and legitimate ?

Originally posted by Robtard

Explain why stealing is legitimate then.