Biden's Historic Infrastructure Bill - What's Inside

Started by ilikecomics7 pages
Originally posted by Blakemore
Technically, it was legitimate. Moral, no. That's how oppressive nations operate.

How can something be legit but immoral ? So if rape was legalized it would be legit ?

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Is superfund like crowd sourcing or something different ?

Superfund sites are the list of contaminated locations usually the result of historical industry that require cleaning up before the land can be used for agriculture or residential purposes. Mostly the result of now defunct chemical companies dumping waste products before their adverse effects on human health were known or before regulations were implemented to stop the environmental impacts caused by those practices. I believe we discussed them briefly when talking about Capitalism and regulations when you argued that there didn't need to be legislation to force companies into more ethical practices and I used superfund sites as an example of why government enforced regulations were necessary.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Yes, and without being backed by gold are only held up via decree through violence.
When you support Fiat currency, you support war.
And you're proud to beee an Ameri-CAN!

Originally posted by ilikecomics
How can something be legit but immoral ? So if rape was legalized it would be legit ?
That's what legitimacy means. Learn some etymology.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Superfund sites are the list of contaminated locations usually the result of historical industry that require cleaning up before the land can be used for agriculture or residential purposes. Mostly the result of now defunct chemical companies dumping waste products before their adverse effects on human health were known or before regulations were implemented to stop the environmental impacts caused by those practices. I believe we discussed them briefly when talking about Capitalism and regulations when you argued that there didn't need to be legislation to force companies into more ethical practices and I used superfund sites as an example of why government enforced regulations were necessary.

I think you sent a two part YouTube video with a guy that had a Scottish accent ?

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Explain why stealing is legitimate then.

Sorry, if you want to do your "taxation is theft!" rant yet again, ziggy, go pull up one or the various threads already in existence.

This is about Biden's massive and historic infrastructure that will be creating MASSIVE amounts of jobs for Americans, which scares you.

Originally posted by Blakemore
That's what legitimacy means. Learn some etymology.

I can't believe you think violence sponsored legislation is good because the guys with the most guns said so.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
I think you sent a two part YouTube video with a guy that had a Scottish accent ?

I can't remember tbh. I remember Potholers videos of a conservative solution to global warming. He's not Scottish though.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
I can't believe you think violence sponsored legislation is good because the guys with the most guns said so.
I didn't say it was good, I said it was immoral.

Legitimacy means it was legislated into law.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I can't remember tbh. I remember Potholers videos of a conservative solution to global warming. He's not Scottish though.
potholer54 is awesome. I think I've subscribed to him since 2006. His explanation of how stars were formed were like watching a Carl Sagan video.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
I can't remember tbh. I remember Potholers videos of a conservative solution to global warming. He's not Scottish though.

Why couldn't something like that be solved with crowd funding like boyan slat ?

Originally posted by Robtard
You're lying again, you were a Trumper until he lost.
Trump never legite lost. 😉

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Why couldn't something like that be solved with crowd funding like boyan slat ?

It probably could help. As could charity involvement. I would hazard a guess that there are or have been examples of both but I haven't checked if there are or were.

There may also be private investment from companies that have long since bought over or merged with the old companies that were responsible for the contaminated sites. Again, though, I haven't checked.

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
It probably could help. As could charity involvement. I would hazard a guess that there are or have been examples of both but I haven't checked if there are or were.

There may also be private investment from companies that have long since bought over or merged with the old companies that were responsible for the contaminated sites. Again, though, I haven't checked.

I think anything paid for with taxes automatically says the people don't want it, otherwise they'd go through free market channels.

But if you steal a third of people's wages it's harder for them to contribute to crowd sourcing.

Yes the people don't want uncontaminated land etc. That's why the people of Flint, Michigan love slurping up that poisonous water.

I'm sure we could crowd source roads, dams and electricity pylons while we're at it.

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Trump never legite lost. 😉
*legit*

Originally posted by jaden_2.0
Yes the people don't want uncontaminated land etc. That's why the people of Flint, Michigan love slurping up that poisonous water.

I'm sure we could crowd source roads, dams and electricity pylons while we're at it.

They don't and that's why people like Eddie vedder giving them bottled water did way more than anyone in the flint government.

Boyan slat did it and has cleaned up millions of tons of plastic. So yeah why couldn't we crowd source those things ?

This has been going on since the 90s. George Carlin did a routine where he said "I assume the water is safe to drink in New York?"

The audience screams "no!"

Originally posted by Blakemore
This has been going on since the 90s. George Carlin did a routine where he said "I assume the water is safe to drink in New York?"

The audience screams "no!"

I bet new yorkers were productive and bought clean water

"55 billion to replace lead service lines and provide clean drinking water"

There's going to be a lot of communities with shitty poisonous water getting clean water.