Originally posted by Darth Thor
You realise that was 1 of 3 victims right ?And its still for the law to sort out, not a 17year old with an AK.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Did I say hes guilty of murder? We are talking about remorse here.And do you get this whole situation could have been avoided if he wasnt walking around at a protest he didnt like carrying an AK right?
And if hes not feeling any then hes just a killer plain and simple. And I have no sympathy for him either. Let alone hero worshipping the guy.
Again, you dont just get to shoot who you feel like, it he youre the bigger problem here.
Sure seems like it. How do you know he felt no remorse? Are you a mind reader all of a sudden?
Your blaming him, but not putting any blame on the 3 adults that were out looting and setting fire to the neighborhood? A neighbor he according to his lawyer has family there. Not only that was rendering first aid to others, and prior to the shooting was removing graffiti.
No one is hero worshiping here, all I’m doing is calling you out on your narrative.
Just like you don’t have the right to loot and burn things that aren’t yours, let alone pull a gun on someone else.
Probably not the same person, but an associate. Not the same grammatical errors, but grammatical errors nonetheless and a similar level of opinion and intelligence.
From a more sophisticated perspective euro Kyayele Smitten-blouse was crying because he was shit scared and didn't want to be seen as a murderer to the nation, not that he regretted killing 'dem damn leftists who don't follow da gahd of "White America, **** yeah!" or something along those lines.'
Originally posted by Blakemore
Probably not the same person, but an associate. Not the same grammatical errors, but grammatical errors nonetheless and a similar level of opinion and intelligence.From a more sophisticated perspective euro Kyayele Smitten-blouse was crying because he was shit scared and didn't want to be seen as a murderer to the nation, not that he regretted killing 'dem damn leftists who don't follow da gahd of "White America, **** yeah!" or something along those lines.'
Then he has nothing to fear, Kyle Rittenhouse is no murderer. He is a hero.
Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Yeah, the other guy was a domestic abuser, so little of value was lost there as well; not sure about the third fellow. Look, I get that Rittenhouse is a ****ing yahoo Yosemite Sam-wannabe and probably the last person you want administering justice, but he sure as hell took out some bad rubbish on that day.
So the domestic abuser (Huber) seems to have had mental health problems in the past as well. And seemed to have chased Rittenhouse only because he was carrying an assault weapon.
The third victim who survived also seems to have a criminal record as well, but is gonna live the rest of his life with half his bicep blown off and in excruciating pain all the time.
Originally posted by SquallX
Sure seems like it.
Then you're incapable of following a simple argument.
Originally posted by SquallX
How do you know he felt no remorse? Are you a mind reader all of a sudden?
Because he's cashing in on the fame Duh.
Originally posted by SquallX
Your blaming him, but not putting any blame on the 3 adults that were out looting and setting fire to the neighborhood?
They were looting? Proof.
Also 2 of them are dead and one has his arm dangling off. So what more do you want me to demand off them?
Originally posted by SquallX
No one is hero worshiping here,
Originally posted by cdtm
Kyle Rittenhouse is no murderer. He is a hero.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Then you're incapable of following a simple argument.Because he's cashing in on the fame Duh.
They were looting? Proof.
Also 2 of them are dead and one has his arm dangling off. So what more do you want to do to them?
Tucker invited him onto the show.
Hardly "cashing in".
But even if he HAD, you might want to ask why Civil Rights leaders are worth millions. Surely not from their savvy investments.
Originally posted by Darth ThorThem last two quotes. haermm
Then you're incapable of following a simple argument.Because he's cashing in on the fame Duh.
They were looting? Proof.
Also 2 of them are dead and one has his arm dangling off. So what more do you want me to demand off them?
Originally posted by cdtmHe could've refused the offer and he got payed to show up to the interview. Come on, you must know you're not convincing anyone why white men should own guns because blacks are dangerous like the racist you are.
Tucker invited him onto the show.Hardly "cashing in".
But even if he HAD, you might want to ask why Civil Rights leaders are worth millions. Surely not from their savvy investments.
Originally posted by Blakemore
Them last two quotes. haermmHe could've refused the offer and he got payed to show up to the interview. Come on, you must know you're not convincing anyone why white men should own guns because blacks are dangerous like the racist you are.
You've been reading too many left wing rags if you believe that. 😛
I mean, are blacks too milquetoast to own guns too? How racist!
Rittenhouse became "shittin' house"
"Oh ****, now everyone's gonna think I'm a white supremacist gun nut, I just wanted to stop a riot like a good citizen with mah gun! I didn't mean to kill anyone, but they came at me so I pulled the trigger. Oh ****, maybe that's why they're called assault rifles..."
Dickheads: No, you followed the second amendment, you're a hero! Just don't an hero.
Originally posted by Blakemore
Rittenhouse became "shittin' house""Oh ****, now everyone's gonna think I'm a white supremacist gun nut, I just wanted to stop a riot like a good citizen with mah gun! I didn't mean to kill anyone, but they came at me so I pulled the trigger. Oh ****, maybe that's why they're called assault rifles..."
Dickheads: No, you followed the second amendment, you're a hero! Just don't an hero.
Follow the case, not forums.