Kyle Rittenhouse not guilty

Started by Old Man Whirly!43 pages

Originally posted by cdtm
Rob and Whirl didn't actually say as much, but their words imply they think the AR-15 caused the conflict.

But think about it. You see a man with a rifle at a rally. The gunman runs away.

Do you chase him down? Start a fight with him?

If Kyle got into a pissing contest while brandishing the thing and allowed it to escalate, I'd be more inclined to your logic. The fact is, Kyle didn't do any of that. They deliberately ambushed him.

The gun isn't a cause of that, and no amount of provocation really justified it.

I said exactly as much and the drone footage shows him pointing and prancing around.

Originally posted by cdtm

Interesting how many people defend them on KMC too.

Echo chamber go brrrr.

No one lionized those three on KMC, so you're lying again as usual, Kleon. But vigilante murder is still murder.

Rittenhouse is a girl beater. Weird how the Rightist didn't care about that.

Originally posted by Robtard
No one lionized those three on KMC, so you're lying again as usual, Kleon.

But vigilante murder is still murder.

Yup! Larper provocation is still Larper provocation.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
I said exactly as much and the drone footage shows him pointing and prancing around.

And that justifies the ambush? The attacks?

Do you not understand provocation does not justify hunting someone down as they try and get away from you?

Originally posted by cdtm
And that justifies the ambush? The attacks?

Do you not understand provocation does not justify hunting someone down as they try and get away from you?

Larper pointing guns at people in a heightened state. 😂 durmask

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Yup! Larper provocation is still Larper provocation.

YouTube video

Originally posted by Robtard
YouTube video
😂 👆

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Larper pointing guns at people in a heightened state. 😂 durmask

They chose to be there, and chose to loot.

You say if Kyle wasn't there this never would have happened. I say if they never chose to loot and riot, Kyle never would have been there.

Originally posted by cdtm
They chose to be there, and chose to loot.

You say if Kyle wasn't there this never would have happened. I say if they never chose to loot and riot, Kyle never would have been there.

Yeah theyvchose to demonstrate against injustice and racism. durmask

Destroying property is demonstrating against injustice and Racism now.

Were any of the three found to be looting? Seems they had nothing stolen on their persons after Rittenhouse murdered the two and injured the third. I could be wrong.

Originally posted by Robtard
Were any of the three found to be looting? Seems they had nothing stolen on their persons after Rittenhouse murdered the two and injured the third. I could be wrong.
You're not.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
You're not.

So another Rightist lie. Not surprising.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Yeah theyvchose to demonstrate against injustice and racism. durmask

Demonstrating against racial injustice justifies ambushing someone who was fleeing from you and attempting to harm them?

Originally posted by Robtard
Were any of the three found to be looting? Seems they had nothing stolen on their persons after Rittenhouse murdered the two and injured the third. I could be wrong.

Kyle was putting out fires. If they were not involved in acts of arson, they had no reason to chase after him for putting them out.

No, they had no reason to chase him down, period.

Originally posted by cdtm
Demonstrating against racial injustice justifies ambushing someone who was fleeing from you and attempting to harm them?

On Leftist KMC, yes.

Originally posted by cdtm
Kyle was putting out fires. If they were not involved in acts of arson, they had no reason to chase after him for putting them out.

No, they had no reason to chase him down, period.

No he wasn't he was Larping for provocation.

Kyle went there to kill people. He wanted to live out the right wing fantasy of shooting someone in 'self-defense' and 'protection of property' He didn't know the dude he shot and killed was a pedo at the time of the shooting. However, I dont' think he's a sociopath/psycopath. He went there on someone else's idea and found he didn't have the taste for it he thought he would. Basically, he ****ed around and found out and now his soul is stained. I actually feel bad for him.

Should he have gone to prison? Absolutely, IF the prosecution had been competent. However, it was absolutely awful and incompetent and if he had been sent to prison after that cluster***k I'd actually lose faith in the justice system (which is already dwindling)

As a sidenote, I find it super amusing that the right turns on him a bit for voicing BLM support on tucker carlson.

Originally posted by Klaw
On Leftist KMC, yes.

sad

That's a nice lot of projection.

No one can know his thoughts. He says he was guarding from looters, I'm inclined to believe him.

But even if he was "****ing around", the one who chased him down was acting like 17 year old kid instead of the 36 year old man nearing middle age. Trying to kick Rittenhouse or hit him with a skateboard are what got them killed.

Rittenhouse had as much right to be there as the protestors.