Kyle Rittenhouse not guilty

Started by Robtard43 pages

Originally posted by cdtm
They're pics.

Meme's aside, not much you can make from an image.

Images and video of Rittenhouse's victims were allowed to be shown by the defense as a means to show the character of Rittenhouse's victims. Why not the same for Rittenhouse and his character?

edit: Wait, the prosecution is not allowed to refer to Rittenhouse's victims as "victims", but the defense can call them "looters", even though we don't know if they were actually looting.

Originally posted by Robtard
Images and video of Rittenhouse's victims were allowed to be shown by the defense as a means to show the character of Rittenhouse's victims. Why not the same for Rittenhouse and his character?

edit: Wait, the prosecution is not allowed to refer to Rittenhouse's victims as "victims", but the defense can call them "looters", even though we don't know if they were actually looting.

I missed that part, what did the pics show?

From the ones you posted here, without the captions it can be literally anything.

Everyone can sht in a man's soup, does that add to the flavour?

If Rittenhouse goes free, he will murder again. Mark my words.

Originally posted by ShrtArmIn
Everyone can sht in a man's soup, does that add to the flavour?

Yes?

Originally posted by Robtard
If Rittenhouse goes free, he will murder again. Mark my words.

You really believe it was murder?

Even CBS writers of color argue he had no business even being there, but that be isn't really a racist or even murderer. The argument seems to be discouraging vigilantism.

You must have seen the videos by now, he was clearly being confronted.

YouTube video

Fuk daht

I want somebody who can compare and contrast Karate Kid III to Twin Peaks Season 2.

Otherwise I'm going to call mock-trial.

Also, blue rose

Originally posted by cdtm
You really believe it was murder?

Even CBS writers of color argue he had no business even being there, but that be isn't really a racist or even murderer. The argument seems to be discouraging vigilantism.

You must have seen the videos by now, he was clearly being confronted.

Yup, or at least manslaughter

"Even writers of color" ??? Seems like your mask is slipping again

Going out with an assault rifle to be a vigilante is being confrontational. I have no real problem portraying his victims as confrontational as well, but acting like Rittenhouse was just some innocent kid is disingenuous

Why am I still seeing this

YouTube video

Originally posted by Robtard
Yup, or at least manslaughter

"Even writers of color" ??? Seems like your mask is slipping again

Going out with an assault rifle to be a vigilante is being confrontational. I have no real problem portraying his victims as confrontational as well, but acting like Rittenhouse was just some innocent kid is disingenuous

it read "psuedo-virgin"

He certainly ain't getting no Trinity or uma therman and if he does get sum it's gonna be a big fat retarded strung gahl from one of daddies milk farms

At this point anyone who is still arguing that Rittenhouse is guilty of murder must be trolling.... either that or they haven't bothered to watch the trial or videos.

500 National Guard troops will be on standby outside Kenosha ready to be sent in at a moment's notice in case of left-wing crybaby riots from spoiled brats who throw a fit when they don't get their way.

Originally posted by cdtm
They're pics.

Meme's aside, not much you can make from an image.

dur

Originally posted by Robtard
Yup, or at least manslaughter

"Even writers of color" ??? Seems like your mask is slipping again

Going out with an assault rifle to be a vigilante is being confrontational. I have no real problem portraying his victims as confrontational as well, but acting like Rittenhouse was just some innocent kid is disingenuous

I'm saying activist writers aren't using the word "murder", even if they call him wrong.

You say he was confrontational, yet how did his gun force the confrontation? If he never had the gun, he still would have been chased down, hit on the head with a skateboard, and probably beaten within an inch of his life or worse (You can kill someone with a skateboard)

Gaslighting retards bark that guns are not provocative, but skateboards are dangerous weapons. **** off.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Gaslighting retards bark that guns are not provocative, but skateboards are dangerous weapons. **** off.

That is not what I said.

I said the gun did not provoke the attack. They had no idea he was armed, and would have assaulted him had he not carried a gun.

Edit wrong thread

A local judge once said, " You can't start the fight then claim self defense."