Kyle Rittenhouse not guilty

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Gaslighting retards bark that guns are not provocative, but skateboards are dangerous weapons. **** off.

Maybe young boys wouldn't be so hyped and Jeffrey Dahmer if gun control and ATF white trash male rape culture didn't hog up all the Uma Thurmans, encourage attraction to big fat retarded black gals and hype up being under the meat grinder

YAWN.... H e didn't start shit. He's innocent. I know retard lefies love to gaslight but give it up.

If there's one thing I've learned, it's might makes right, Durr Justice! And good always defeats evil!

Just learned that the judge was appointed by democrats lol. But remember, he's "biased" according to leftists. 😛

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
Just learned that the judge was appointed by democrats lol. But remember, he's "biased" according to leftists. 😛

This is a show trial, they intend to stick something on him no matter what. The judge showed his hand by allowing lesser charges.

This sham is a disgrace, everyone involved should be disbarred and the judge debenched!

Originally posted by cdtm
This is a show trial, they intend to stick something on him no matter what. The judge showed his hand by allowing lesser charges.

This sham is a disgrace, everyone involved should be disbarred and the judge debenched!

Originally posted by eThneoLgrRnae
They won't get the murder conviction though. That's the big one.

Because the prosecution was so incompetent. I think the judge was pissed at the prosecution for destroying their own case and not getting the conviction he wants.

"ThEy HaD nO iDeA hE wAs ArMeD!" **** you, stupid.

I was only half joking about a show trial, but this scares me:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/6393112001

Why would a judge blatantly virtue signal to a side?

Two reasons I can think of:

1. He is unconsciously biased to the right and not fit to judge this case.

2. He is covering for the fact he is biased for the left. Still unfit to judge.

Originally posted by cdtm
I was only half joking about a show trial, but this scares me:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/6393112001

Why would a judge blatantly virtue signal to a side?

Two reasons I can think of:

1. He is unconsciously biased to the right and not fit to judge this case.

2. He is covering for the fact he is biased for the left. Still unfit to judge.

It would be better for him if he gets some jailtime, even if it's not the max. Otherwise, he will have a target on his back for the rest of his life, the public outcry would be like Rodney King all over again, and a whole nation of gun owners will think they can travel state to state with their firearms and shoot anyone who is 'disturbing the peace.'

I may be a fan of The Punisher in comics, movies and TV, but real life is something else. Besides, The Punisher doesn't want followers or groupies to imitate or copy him. Which is what will happen if Rittenhouse gets nothing.

Originally posted by roughrider
It would be better for him if he gets some jailtime, even if it's not the max. Otherwise, he will have a target on his back for the rest of his life, the public outcry would be like Rodney King all over again, and a whole nation of gun owners will think they can travel state to state with their firearms and shoot anyone who is 'disturbing the peace.'

I may be a fan of The Punisher in comics, movies and TV, but real life is something else. Besides, The Punisher doesn't want followers or groupies to imitate or copy him. Which is what will happen if Rittenhouse gets nothing.

Like I said, it wasn't the gun that caused the confrontation.

If Kyle did not bring a gun, would he have been attacked?

To me that's all that matters. If the gun caused the fight, sure condemn him. But it didn't. They chased him down without any knowledge of the fact he was armed.

Originally posted by cdtm
Like I said, it wasn't the gun that caused the confrontation.

If Kyle did not bring a gun, [b]would he have been attacked?

To me that's all that matters. If the gun caused the fight, sure condemn him. But it didn't. They chased him down without any knowledge of the fact he was armed. [/B]

Originally posted by cdtm
Like I said, it wasn't the gun that caused the confrontation.

If Kyle did not bring a gun, [b]would he have been attacked?

To me that's all that matters. If the gun caused the fight, sure condemn him. But it didn't. They chased him down without any knowledge of the fact he was armed. [/B]

How on earth wouldn't they know he was armed when he was carrying a rifle? You can't conceal that. That makes no sense.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Yeah the gun caused the confrontations. That's obvious.

No, putting out fires did.

They chased him. No one intentionally chases after an armed man with a club.

Originally posted by truejedi
How on earth wouldn't they know he was armed when he was carrying a rifle? You can't conceal that. That makes no sense.

Americans need to understand, it's not just KR on trial here... our right to use our 2nd amendment to defend ourselves is well. I'm fairly certainly he will be found not guilty because the evidence clearly shows he acted in self defense.

Originally posted by cdtm
No, putting out fires did.

They [b]chased him. No one intentionally chases after an armed man with a club. [/B]

Does anyone on here even understand the fact that he can be found guilty of some charges and not guilty on others?