Slate of Conservative political novices win school board election races.

Started by Robtard3 pages

He could of also stayed disappointed with the Left and also not voted for Trump, eg 3rd party, not vote, write in, those were also options instead of voting for Trump and then blaming others for his actions like a coward with zero accountability.

Originally posted by Robtard
He could of also stayed disappointed with the Left and also not voted for Trump, eg 3rd party, not vote, write in, those were also options instead of voting for Trump and then blaming others for his actions like a coward with zero accountability.

I don't even believe in voting. A vote for anyone, from my pov, is saying I want to use the State's gun on tho who didn't vote who I voted for.

But I understand what you're saying now. He's blaming the dog for farting, but in this case the dog is the left. I agree with you.

Good for you?

No, you got that purposely wrong again. Using your analogy: He's the one who farted (voted for Trump) and is blaming the dog (the Left) for his own farts (voting choice) instead of just owning up that he's the one who farted.

But that's still wrong in the sense that one has to fart at some point. When in this scenario he didn't have to fart to begin with, he had other options.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_theory

Read this.
CRT is a subset of this.

A subset is not the entire set though.

And you never answered on if teaching those things is bad.

Originally posted by Newjak
A subset is not the entire set though.

And you never answered on if teaching those things is bad.

Yes, teaching is critical theory, any part of it, is bad. It is corrosive.

Originally posted by Robtard
Good for you?

No, you got that purposely wrong again. Using your analogy: He's the one who farted (voted for Trump) and is blaming the dog (the Left) for his own farts (voting choice) instead of just owning up that he's the one who farted.

But that's still wrong in the sense that one has to fart at some point. When in this scenario he didn't have to fart to begin with, he had other options.

Yeah, I agree with that.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Yes, teaching is critical theory, any part of it, is bad. It is corrosive.
So you think teaching the historically accurate statement that the Founding Fathers owned slaves is bad? Really?

Originally posted by Newjak
So you think teaching the historically accurate statement that the Founding Fathers owned slaves is bad? Really?

No, teaching with accuracy is great.
Ideologically based education, not so much.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
No, teaching with accuracy is great.
Ideologically based education, not so much.
😆

What is the ideologically based education you are talking about?

Originally posted by Newjak
😆

What is the ideologically based education you are talking about?

Do you think critical theory is ideologically based ? Let's put aside the argument about whether it's being taught in public schools or not.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Do you think critical theory is ideologically based ? Let's put aside the argument about whether it's being taught in public schools or not.
Actually I would argue the curriculum that conservatives want taught is ideological based education.

People wanting to teach about actual history without the filter of removing key aspects because it makes certain people, events, and organizations look bad is accurate education.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Do you think critical theory is ideologically based ? Let's put aside the argument about whether it's being taught in public schools or not.
mmm Ziggy please stop!
Originally posted by Newjak
Actually I would argue the curriculum that conservatives want taught is ideological based education.

People wanting to teach about actual history without the filter of removing key aspects because it makes certain people, events, and organizations look bad is accurate education.

👆 Bingo!

Originally posted by Newjak
Actually I would argue the curriculum that conservatives want taught is ideological based education.

People wanting to teach about actual history without the filter of removing key aspects because it makes certain people, events, and organizations look bad is accurate education.

Im pro homeschooling, so I think anything taught in a public school isn't all that accurate.

Also I agree that right wing ideologically based education is bad.

So to resummarize my opinion on it: if there are ideas from any critical (the critical in critical theory is specialized and not the same critical in critical thinking), ideological, or fallacious source is bad.

If the ideas the right are calling crt are in fact just accurate facts then I would tell them to shut up and homeschool if they don't like it.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
mmm Ziggy please stop! 👆 Bingo!

If me and Ziggy espouse the same ideas, what benefit does the sock account provide ?

Calling me Ziggy is just a stand in for a lack of an argument.

Originally posted by ilikecomics
If me and Ziggy espouse the same ideas, what benefit does the sock account provide ?

Calling me Ziggy is just a stand in for a lack of an argument.

it really isn't -not Ziggy.