Why are boys being attacked for being boys?

Started by Stoic5 pages

Why are boys being attacked for being boys?

Are men being raised to be effeminate? Has the feminist movement crossed the line? Is there anything wrong with being a strong man in today’s society?

I’d be interested in reading opinions on this volatile subject.

Uniform

When not presented with the choice of happiness the effort needs freedom to have the bark of the tree 🌳 communicate health.

OP is an incel phaggot

Good question Stoic. Boys raised by western culture can have knowledge as a systematic reflection of their beliefs.

go back to the otf wondercunt

Bashar Teg. If you see an adversity in your life you should credit it and acceptance will follow.

"Why are boys being attacked for being boys?"

Examples?

Originally posted by Robtard
"Why are boys being attacked for being boys?"

Examples?

or is it boys just don't want to become men and take on the responsibility of looking after others. Today's boys think masculinity is fighting a 40 on a Saturday. Not making sure food is on the table for your family. 😖hifty:

I thought this was made by Bashar Teg. Reason: Bashar Teg lives in New Jersey, Free Country USA.

Oh wait, Bashar Teg lives in your mind rent free.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
OP is an incel phaggot

It was a simple question. Don't be so rude.

It was kinda loaded, as it states boys are indeed being attacked for being "boys". Are they?

And if they are, but it's rando faceless people on shit like Twitter and 4chan, then that's an answer onto itself.

Originally posted by Robtard
It was kinda loaded, as it states boys are indeed being attacked for being "boys". Are they?

And if they are, but it's rando faceless people on shit like Twitter and 4chan, then that's an answer onto itself.

I don't see anything wrong with believing it's a loaded question. If you or Bash think Stoic has an ulterior motive, that's fine too. But that reaction isn't appropriate.

Especially since the topic of raising boys and the various arguments about how it's done are more prevalent in media than ever. It's not like he pulled the topic out of thin air either; everyone is throwing their two cents in about how boys are being raised nowadays, which ties in massively to what Stoic asked about.

Didn't personally have a problem with it, why I asked for examples in my 1st post. to see where the motive is. But I also know loaded questions can illicit certain responses.

Originally posted by Robtard
Didn't personally have a problem with it, why I asked for examples in my 1st post. to see where the motive is. But I also know loaded questions can illicit certain responses.

Some examples would have helped, yes. I agree on that.

Originally posted by Robtard
"Why are boys being attacked for being boys?"

Examples?

In the U.K., boys were asked to wear skirts in order to appease injustices placed upon women is one example. For the record, I am not bashing women. I’m referring to videos posted on YouTube that I recently viewed.

Originally posted by Stoic
In the U.K., boys were asked to wear skirts in order to appease injustices placed upon women is one example. For the record, I am not bashing women. I’m referring to videos posted on YouTube that I recently viewed.
.... durpalm

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
.... durpalm

It aired on the news. Look it up.

Simply type Boys forced to wear skirts in the YouTube search box.

Originally posted by Stoic
In the U.K., boys were asked to wear skirts in order to appease injustices placed upon women is one example. For the record, I am not bashing women. I’m referring to videos posted on YouTube that I recently viewed.

Now imagine being a girl, and being forced—not asked—to wear one every day as part of your school uniform. Wow, it is almost like there is point there somewhere.

Originally posted by Stoic
In the U.K., boys were asked to wear skirts in order to appease injustices placed upon women is one example. For the record, I am not bashing women. I’m referring to videos posted on YouTube that I recently viewed.

That's not an "attack on boys for being boys".