Here's the Supreme/Gladiator comic.
https://readcomiconline.li/Comic/Gladiator-Supreme/Full?id=101001
Do show us where Image/marvel mention of Superman.
Here's the Supreme/Gladiator comic.
https://readcomiconline.li/Comic/Gladiator-Supreme/Full?id=101001
Do show us where Image/marvel mention of Superman.
Originally posted by JBL
Did image comics say that no man of steel can beat Supreme? Yes or no? Did both Marvel and image make references to Superman in that book or not? Yes or no. Why would image and Marvel make references to a third comic book companys character??? Smh.
Even if the false bravado you're spewing happened, them making the claim doesn't matter unless DC agreed. Much like you can say all you want you have an IQ over 50, it doesn't make it true nor change the fact you're an autistic spaz whose mother made two mistakes. First not sucking dick instead, second not fixing the first mistake with a coat hanger.
Originally posted by Delta1938To each their own. I understand the point of replying to trollish posters when there’s at least some level of mutual engagement in the topic but JBL is just unhinged from reality. You could accept everything he’s said about Image’s stance of Supreme as true and it still wouldn’t form a coherent argument because it’s so utterly irrelevant.
Fun to kick him while he's down, and he's too stupid to feel pain so no reason to stop.
Originally posted by Smurph
To each their own. I understand the point of replying to trollish posters when there’s at least some level of mutual engagement in the topic but JBL is just unhinged from reality. You could accept everything he’s said about Image’s stance of Supreme as true and it still wouldn’t form a coherent argument because it’s so utterly irrelevant.
It's like that dude in a wheelchair who talks so much shit and claims he's more physically capable than you. There's only so long you can tolerate it before you wreck him at what he says he's better than you at. Then flip the chair over and give the middle finger as you leave while he struggles on the ground. Yea, JLB is the equivalent of that. Probably also actually that.
Okay, if someone at Image said that "No Man of Steel can beat Supreme", when they were specifically talking about Colossus (whose power is to turn his body into organic steel), how is that a direct reference to Superman? If they said something like "No Man of Tomorrow can beat Supreme" when talking about Supreme vs Spider-Man 2099, would that be a reference to Superman too?
And even if it was, so what? Didn't Joe Casey once say that OWAW Superman could beat Galactus at full power? No one takes that as canon evidence of anything.
Originally posted by Endless Mike
Okay, if someone at Image said that "No Man of Steel can beat Supreme", when they were specifically talking about Colossus (whose power is to turn his body into organic steel), how is that a direct reference to Superman? If they said something like "No Man of Tomorrow can beat Supreme" when talking about Supreme vs Spider-Man 2099, would that be a reference to Superman too?And even if it was, so what? Didn't Joe Casey once say that OWAW Superman could beat Galactus at full power? No one takes that as canon evidence of anything.
Originally posted by abhilegend
I found no such thing from Supreme comic.
So basically his argument is:
- An Image writer once said that Supreme could beat Colossus, and phrased it in a way to possibly mean that Supreme could beat Superman, too (But he has no scan or citation for this)
- Supreme fought Gladiator in a non-canon crossover (in which Gladiator lost)
- Therefore, Gladiator would beat Superman?
I think this is what TVtropes calls Insane Troll Logic.
Originally posted by JBL
Smh. Who is known as THE MAN OF STEEL? Superman or Colossus???? Stop crying. That was a direct shot at Superman.
Show the quote. And no, you show me. Don't tell me to "do your own research." Debates don't work that why and the fact you're saying that when pressed to back your case proves you're an idiot, whether you actually think that's how it works, or you don't actually have what you claim and you think "do your own research" doesn't make you look as retarded a little b itch as you are.
Originally posted by Delta1938lol. Ask nicely.
Show the quote. And no, you show me. Don't tell me to "do your own research." Debates don't work that why and the fact you're saying that when pressed to back your case proves you're an idiot, whether you actually think that's how it works, or you don't actually have what you claim and you think "do your own research" doesn't make you look as retarded a little b itch as you are.
Originally posted by Endless MikeLol, when did Gladiator lose?
So basically his argument is:- An Image writer once said that Supreme could beat Colossus, and phrased it in a way to possibly mean that Supreme could beat Superman, too (But he has no scan or citation for this)
- Supreme fought Gladiator in a non-canon crossover (in which Gladiator lost)
- Therefore, Gladiator would beat Superman?
I think this is what TVtropes calls Insane Troll Logic.