Superman vs. Gladiator, Hyperion, Sentry and Count Nefaria

Started by JBL39 pages

Originally posted by Delta1938
😆 Retard thinks he has a point. And no lie, it's just another example of you idiots thinking you have a point and being too stupid to know you're stupid. If you're so confident Gladiator >Superman then BZ it with me. I'll even handicap myself to help you being mentally handicapped, and make it two judges, you only have to convinceone, I have to convince both. You game, or do you lack a pair to drop?
Lmao, I have seen enough of your lies to decline your offer. Besides, who would BZ about superman on a site that worship the character? Not me. Too many lies about the character will surface. Now when you claim I'm scared, re-read this post.

Originally posted by JBL
Stoic, answer this question. What does this statement mean? No man of steel is beating Supreme. In other words, Image said without opposition, that Superman CANNOT beat Supreme. Point blank. Now you have flies buzzing around wanting proof when it's right in their face. Just swat them away for they know nothing. The reason that Supreme and Superman never fought was because DC backed down because they knew superman would lose. That's why Image Comics took it upon themselves to make that Statement directed at Superman and DC comics. So who did they go after next?? Kallark, now where did the name Kallark come from? Kal and Clark. Now Marvels Gladiator unlike Superman can get stronger the more confident he is, So Supreme was not going to run over Gladiator like he would have Superman. Wait? I just said that gladiator gets stronger and more powerful the more confident he is. Now of course certain idiots on here will beg for proof. Yet. If they were smart enough, they would look at that fight between Gladiator and Supreme and get all the proof they need. But unfortunately, them being idiots, they lack the ability to see or understand how to obtain that information. I want you to read that book, read it slowly and carefully, make mental notes of what the characters are saying and what actions they take immediately after. Pay close attention to the changing mindset of both characters. Don't be like these superman fans who would see pictures of a man beating a polar bear and then go around bragging about the man beating that bear while failing to understand that the bear was drugged, de-clawed, teeth ripped out and nearly 100 years old.

First of all that was within the comments pages, and the question was how well would Colossus do against Supreme, which they then responded by stating that no man of steel could defeat Supreme. An obvious error which was claimed by Rob’s crew, because Superman has since surpassed every single Supreme feat published. You don’t seem to get it. Superman is literally essential to DC comics continuity. He is as powerful as the story needs him to be. Gladiator is just a fragment of that which makes up for Superman, and I mean in every way.

Why would you bother arguing for a character with such a choppy win/loss percentile? Just… No, okay.

Supreme can certainly squish Colossus, but never Superman. He’d punch Supremes lights out.

Originally posted by JBL
Lmao, I have seen enough of your lies to decline your offer. Besides, who would BZ about superman on a site that worship the character? Not me. Too many lies about the character will surface. Now when you claim I'm scared, re-read this post.

Translation: You're afraid and, badly(straw graspingly badly), trying to hide it. Concessions accepted, JLB.Yes, I reread it, you're pussying out.

Originally posted by JBL
lmao. The proof was given, not my fault you are too dumb to see it. By the way, I think Carver caught you in ANOTHER lie in the other thread. You and delta are now neck and neck for being caught lying. Go and try to save yourself there.

Where's the proof, you whiny *****?

Originally posted by JBL
Lmao, I have seen enough of your lies to decline your offer. Besides, who would BZ about superman on a site that worship the character? Not me. Too many lies about the character will surface. Now when you claim I'm scared, re-read this post.

Where's the proof, loser?

They WERE talking about Superman stoic. No way around it. It's your opinion against Image comics?? You don't speak for image or DC comics.

Originally posted by JBL
They WERE talking about Superman stoic. No way around it. It's your opinion against Image comics?? You don't speak for image or DC comics.

And Image speaks for DC? Hypocrite.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Where's the proof, loser?
lol, No Man of steel can beat Supreme. Go cry to image and weep to DC for not defending Superman. Loser.

Originally posted by JBL
lol, No Man if steel can beat Supreme. Go cry to image and weep to DC for not defending Superman. Loser.

Concessions accepted, inbred loser. Just a Lying B itch.

Originally posted by Delta1938
And Image speaks for DC? Hypocrite.
No, they spoke directly to DC. That's a FACT. Image knows what Superman can do. Go cry to DC for not defending Superman. Marvel didn't have to defend Gladiator/Kallark/kal-Clark. They went head to head and even made references to the coward DC superman. FACT.

Originally posted by JBL
lol, No Man of steel can beat Supreme. Go cry to image and weep to DC for not defending Superman. Loser.

Where's the proof of Image comic ever saying that, little bitch?

Originally posted by JBL
No, they spoke directly to DC. That's a FACT. Image knows what Superman can do. Go cry to DC for not defending Superman. Marvel didn't have to defend Gladiator/Kallark/kal-Clark. They went head to head and even made references to the coward DC superman. FACT.

Where's the scan/proof of Image ever saying that, loser?

Wow it's getting intense in here I like the fire

Originally posted by abhilegend
Where's the scan/proof of Image ever saying that, loser?
Did image comics say that no man of steel can beat Supreme? Yes or no? Did both Marvel and image make references to Superman in that book or not? Yes or no. Why would image and Marvel make references to a third comic book companys character??? Smh.

Originally posted by JBL
Did image comics say that no man of steel can beat Supreme? Yes or no? Did both Marvel and image make references to Superman in that book or not? Yes or no. Why would image and Marvel make references to a third comic book companys character??? Smh.
durpalm

I rest my case.

Originally posted by JBL
Did image comics say that no man of steel can beat Supreme? Yes or no? Did both Marvel and image make references to Superman in that book or not? Yes or no. Why would image and Marvel make references to a third comic book companys character??? Smh.

You can’t use that as evidence. That’s taking someone else’s opinion and running with it as if it’s fact. They have never fought. Supreme’s battle with Gladiator isn’t anything that is usable in a forum because Supreme wasn’t in his right mind. Supreme is Omni Man level. This can be used because they actually fought, and Supreme was in his right mind. Gladiator has yet to prove that he can take the Wrecking Crew solo, before he would ever be considered able to consistently battle it out with even Omni-Man level opponents.

Originally posted by JBL
Did image comics say that no man of steel can beat Supreme? Yes or no? Did both Marvel and image make references to Superman in that book or not? Yes or no. Why would image and Marvel make references to a third comic book companys character??? Smh.

No, Image never said any of that because I've never seen any proof for it.

That's what I'm asking, Where's the proof, loser?

Originally posted by JBL
I rest my case.

You'll rest when you show that proof, loser.