How many GL's to take down these guys?

Originally posted by carver9

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
And it basically is the same reason why writers dont let those main characters but also just normal humans die in the Superman and Doomsday case
1 You literally get a scene that depicted Superman and Doomsday's shockwaves were destroying their surroundings, Which should be able to kill lois and others by logic
https://ibb.co/MCQK1v8
2 Comic books always have stuff like that. For example, In Doomsday Clock when Captain Atom created a huge explosion but normal humans like Green Arrow/Batgirl/Nightwing/Question still survive this explosion, Which also should be able to kill them by logic
https://readcomiconline.li/Comic/Doomsday-Clock/Issue-9?id=151016#29
https://readcomiconline.li/Comic/Doomsday-Clock/Issue-9?id=151016#30
https://readcomiconline.li/Comic/Doomsday-Clock/Issue-9?id=151016#31
https://readcomiconline.li/Comic/Doomsday-Clock/Issue-9?id=151016#32

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
You didnt address my point though

Arguing the bio is hyperbolic by using lois and others just doesnt work. Because comics(or more precisely, basically all fictions) are full of stuff like this

People dont get killed when they should be killed by logic

Clothes dont get destroyed when they should be destroyed by logic

Surroundings/grounds dont get shattered when they should be shattered by logic etc
Such like this

the blast itself being powerful enough to destroy several billion entire dimensions but still doesnt do any damage to Owen's apartment
https://ibb.co/h7sL0JY

My argument there is, the scenes are different and it is. Collateral damage wasn't the main argument.

Originally posted by carver9
My argument there is, the scenes are different and it is. Collateral damage wasn't the main argument.

Plus, see my Captain Atom's example

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
So what could possibly kill Lois and Jimmy, if not collateral damage?

Plus, see my Captain Atom's example

In THIS case, we would use this argument since the scenes are completely different. One scene we see Lois literally right beside them while the fight was happening. I'm talking about hugging distance. In the later scene, we see OMNI blast punches which is obviously not what happened during the original scene.

I'm not even talking about WBH destroying the Earth

I'm talking about him destroying a pickup truck, within hugging distance.

Originally posted by carver9
One scene we see Lois literally right beside them while the fight was happening. I'm talking about hugging distance.

Originally posted by carver9
Lois was literally right beside Doomsday and Superman when they were fighting. I'm talking about, she was able to touch him and probably throw out a hug if she wanted to during the time Doomsday and Superman were fighting. It's hyperbole.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I'm not even talking about WBH destroying the Earth

I'm talking about him destroying a pickup truck, within hugging distance.

Before we start this again, does this apply to everyone? Asking for a friend.

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
So this is your original argument

Please tell me, what is your probelm with Lois was in a close distance when Superman and Doomsday were fighting? What made you think the planet-shaking statement is hyperbole?

OMNI attacks, boulders and sh** flying in the second scene while none of that happened on the first fight.

Originally posted by carver9
Before we start this again, does this apply to everyone? Asking for a friend.

No, because this

Originally posted by carver9
I've never used collateral damage as a means of fighting

Also don't forget the post DS mentioned in this thread

Originally posted by carver9
They beat on him and killed him COMBINED/all together with punches that did nothing to the moon.

Originally posted by carver9
OMNI attacks, boulders and sh** flying in the second scene while none of that happened on the first fight.

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998

Please tell me, what is your probelm with Lois was in a close distance when Superman and Doomsday were fighting? What made you think the planet-shaking statement is hyperbole?

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
So what could possibly kill Lois and Jimmy, if not collateral damage?

Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
No, because this

😂

Also don't forget the post DS mentioned in this thread

That's old sh**. Lets stay in the present

Originally posted by carver9
https://ibb.co/YbGzcYC
https://ibb.co/64jtj3n

Lmao at posting pre crisis. The desperation.

Everything is canon and that comic was canon even post Crisis, you idiot.

Originally posted by carver9
That's old sh**. Lets stay in the present

Yeah. I don't use collateral damage. I ONLY used it, to point out how stupid the argument is. Same with Hulk's trousers - despite being next to this OMNI wave (lol), they never get destroyed.

Carver, all you ever do is react. If I post A, you will react and argue B. If I post B, you'll react and argue A. That's all you ever do with me these days.

So I decided to throw it back in your face, with WBH and pickup trucks (note I've only JUST started arguing this, relatively recently). You don't like it, and accuse me of picking and choosing.

Now stop and breathe. Reread what I wrote above. Stop
Think about it. Let's go on.

I never argue collateral, I only use it against people like yourself (go see all my posts on it). Only to prove a point.

That's all.

Originally posted by abhilegend
That's a different comic carter and as usual you are missing context.

Everything is canon and that comic was canon even post Crisis, you idiot.

Wait, so does fts not count for characters in other comics? Is this how it works because you do not debate like this. Never have. The ft stays with the character. Even Cates admits its the same suit. The exact same one.

You're using PC fts because of desperation. That's all

Originally posted by carver9
Wait, so does fts not count for characters in other comics? Is this how it works because you do not debate like this. Never have. The ft stays with the character. Even Cates admits its the same suit. The exact same one.

You're using PC fts because of desperation. That's all

https://readcomiconline.li/Comic/Iron-Man-2013/Issue-14?id=19803

Even you can't be this much of an idiot.

I'm desperate, huh?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Its a different armor carter. Celestial hulkbuster debuted in King In Black which was in 2020.

https://readcomiconline.li/Comic/Iron-Man-2013/Issue-14?id=19803

Even you can't be this much of an idiot.

I'm desperate, huh?

Wait, why did you post the link above? Didn't Ironman take pieces from the armor I listed above for his Celestial busting armor?

Originally posted by carver9
That's old sh**. Lets stay in the present

Originally posted by carver9
Wait, why did you post the link above? Didn't Ironman take pieces from the armor I listed above for his Celestial busting armor?

Originally posted by carver9
Wait, why did you post the link above? Didn't Ironman take pieces from the armor I listed above for his Celestial busting armor?