Originally posted by Makedde
I do believe I am beginning to understand what you mean, although I don't actually agree. 🙂
My main point was that previously you said nobody can deny life begins at conception, only to then say "If it has a heartbeat, it's a life." Which would mean, as cells are not in possession of a life, that life cannot begin at conception.
-AC
Originally posted by sithsaber408
It's illegal in South Dakota now,the govenor signed the bill.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11705496/from/RL.4/
(soon to head to the Supreme Court)[B] IT HAS BEGUN!!!
Mortal Kombat!!! [/B]
😆 Now you got that damn rave song stuck in my head!
Originally posted by DiamondBullets
"Rebel"? I'm just giving thumbs up to a good law.
Although I don't think abortion is a good thing, the most important thing anyone should be concerned about is the rape victims mental state. It won't help her to carry a rapists child, it will not help her recover, it would be like being raped all over again, this time for 9 months.
Originally posted by DiamondBullets
I wonder why the woman who chose to have their rape babies did it. What made them choose to do so?
duh, so they can take it out on the kid later by viciously beating and abusing it.
Don't you know what the culture of life is about? Babies HAVE TO BE BORN. Who gives a shit about what happens to them afterward? They don't need education or healthcare. And according to James Dobson's focus on the family you should beat them till they cry to show them who's boss, and show them their daddy's penis in the shower so they don't turn gay.
now do you get it? We just have to get them out of mommy's snootch. AFter that, who cares?
Originally posted by powerfulone1987
It's been signed and it's starting and pretty soon hopefully it'll spread and the world will be a better place.is it comprehensible.....
A better place, to you, is where rape victims are forced to give birth to babies born out of a heinous attack?
I recommend harakiri. A better world would not involve people who think like you or Bullets, that's for sure.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
My main point was that previously you said nobody can deny life begins at conception, only to then say "If it has a heartbeat, it's a life." Which would mean, as cells are not in possession of a life, that life cannot begin at conception.-AC
I LOATHE that whole heartbeat argument. If you take ANY TWO heartcells and put them together, they start to beat, and an audible heartbeat occurs. But is it actually doing anything? No. Even a couple thousand cells aren't enough to create an actual working heart. A working heart doesnt appear until it's classified as a foetus, 8 weeks after conception. MUCH later than the mere 21 days pro-lifers claim.
That isnt directed to you AC, I just needed to get that out.