Abortion

dont have to be sorry clovie it was refreshing as hell

Originally posted by Clovie
it has nothing to do with a subject.. i just thought you were making something liek a goodbye thread..and I haven't seen you since then... but yeah..i guess it is not the right place, sorry.

Meka..who? 😑

anyway... I'm not saying that you should change your views. and I'm not saying that women should be not able to choose..and the fact that I would never support it is just a fact. and nothing more.
all I'd like is that there is no need to something like that be happening. coz it is wrong. from the very beginning..

and I think it is not the wisest to try to disregard my opinion by says that you've never seen me and some random person online at the same time..

That wasn't the reason; the reason was your complete lack of understanding of what I posted.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Haha.

I've never seen you and Makedde online at the same time.

Coincidence? Probably.

Interesting nonetheless.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Haha.

I've never seen you and Makedde online at the same time.

Coincidence? Probably.

Interesting nonetheless.

Slightly below the belt. Clovie's trying to make a valid point, comparisons between her and another member you happen to have a low opinion of are hardly necessary.

Originally posted by Eis
Make is by far worse than Clovie. She's in Whob's level of obnoxiousness.

Yeah, obnoxiousness wasn't actually the common denominator.

Anyway, I reckon this is off-topic.

Originally posted by Syren
Slightly below the belt. Clovie's trying to make a valid point, comparisons between her and another member you happen to have a low opinion of are hardly necessary.

Neither are assumptions about my opinion of Makedde.

She completely misunderstood my post, as Makedde often does.

So what was your point?

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Haha.

I've never seen you and Makedde online at the same time.

Coincidence? Probably.

Interesting nonetheless.

Assumptions? You referring to who's online and when is an assumption in itself. Coincidence? Probably.

Originally posted by Syren
Assumptions? You referring to who's online and when is an assumption in itself. Coincidence? Probably.

It wasn't an assumption.

I wasn't being serious, as Clovie knows, so I'm not sure what your stake in it is. Although I'm sure you will want to carry on so as to save face. If you could just direct it to my PM box, where it can be deleted more efficiently.

Cheers.

I apologise if you weren't being serious. I assumed (I know) that you were taking a hit at Clovie.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
It wasn't an assumption.

I wasn't being serious, as Clovie knows, so I'm not sure what your stake in it is. Although I'm sure you will want to carry on so as to save face. If you could just direct it to my PM box, where it can be deleted more efficiently.

Cheers.

Oh Debs nono

Originally posted by Makedde
If no one argued that abortion was murder, this debate would be over, because the whole point of being pro life is to argue that abortion is murder.

Originally posted by DiamondBullets
✅

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Yes you are correct, upon a woman's birth she contains a tiny ovum within her body that's already been fertilized with male sperm.
So yeah..off course it's part of the woman's body!!
What was I thinking. Women are the one's who are born with the inherent ability to create life, so they are also born with the inherent ability to take it away.

My bad man..thanks for the clarification...😉

Originally posted by Syren
I apologise if you weren't being serious. I assumed (I know) that you were taking a hit at Clovie.

No need to apologise. Just stop replying about it so I can write off the wasted time in replying to you about it.

Originally posted by Syren
Oh Debs nono

Originally posted by debbiejo
Well who knows what your talking about........you are from Europe arent you??????????????..........hahaha

Yeah, we like our grammar and punctuation over here. Unlike you North/South Americans (and surrounding Islands, even the ones that look like a dot).

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
For the love of intellect.

Murder is a legal term and only a legal term. Therefore nothing to do with abortion can ever be murder.

Anything else is just immoral killing, not murder. It's all been explained to you.

-AC

AC, I would still say that murder is not an exclusively legal term. It has entered the language, much as any term has, and as such its definition has changed. Its legal definition is still the same, but in common language it has been expanded to mean other things too.

Originally posted by Trickster
AC, I would still say that murder is not an exclusively legal term. It has entered the language, much as any term has, and as such its definition has changed. Its legal definition is still the same, but in common language it has been expanded to mean other things too.

Firstly, if you would say it's more than a legal term, you'd be wrong.

Second, as pointed out by someone else before me, if other definitions are your concern then try to get a rape sentence for someone who has "raped" your land.

Murder is only a legal term.

-AC

Is more than just a legal term, AC. And the definition of murder fits is correct.

Murder: "The crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought"

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
Is more than just a legal term. And the definition of murder fits like ring:

[b]Murder: "The crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought" [/B]

No, it's not more than just a legal term. When/If (not going to happen) the worldwide law changes, we can discuss it then. There's no such thing as legal murder is there? No.

Second, the definition doesn't fit because it's not considered a "person" as long as it is dependent on the mother. So again, murder is not applicable. Try "Immoral killing".

This is precisely why the thread is permanently in limbo, but hopefully it'll sink in one day.

-AC

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
even the ones that look like a dot).

.........................<------------------Dotz 🙄