Krunk> "sithsaber408, if you were designed intelligently, then there must be something wrong with the production line because you ended up an idiot."
😄
Okay, I absolutely do NOT favour stooping to personal insults in a debate, as that is clearly a sign of weakness. Easy for me to say... let's flip back a few hundred pages and see who started tossing the mud first...
AC> Why do the anti-abortionist consistenly refuse to answer how many of them would adopt or how many of them are paying to help poor, starving kids around the world???
docb77> Why do you insist on calling AC a pro-abortionist. If you think about the term, that would imply a person insisting on everyone aborting! No one here thinks abortions are an easy subjebt or choice, yet the choice must remain to ensure liberty and equality.
(Quitly bangs head against wall at Wesker's and Ariel_Luver's posts). PLEASE, for the love of God or Allah or whatever deity or not you preefer ... READ the thread, please.
Maybe we should just make a list, like af FAQ and post it when the adoption, murder, woman-has-no-right, baby-arguments surface? Didn't we do that in the evolution thread months ago?
Originally posted by Arachnoidfreak
You don't see a paradox in "Abortion is wrong and its murder. No wait, it's not wrong anymore if the mother was raped. But it's still murder. But that makes murder ok in that instance."??
He was being sarcastic if you havent noticed. Hes saying that there really is no difference between why abortions occur because they are all murder, just using a different way to get the point across i think.
Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
Why is this thread still being argued all that can be said has been said a million times here.
Exactly.
That's what happens when you get ignorant new people who, instead of reading the thread, come in and think they deserve the attention to rehash old arguments.
-AC
Originally posted by The Black Ghost
He was being sarcastic if you havent noticed. Hes saying that there really is no difference between why abortions occur because they are all murder, just using a different way to get the point across i think.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Yeah, and that's exactly why he's being silly.Because they're not murder. This point has been finished many times. The facts are against you, so quit bringing that argument to the table.
-AC
Many thanks AC, I don't know how I could have explained myself any better. I was being silly, I knew exactly what Wesker's point was, and I agree with it.
I was just putting something forth because it crossed my mind and if I hadn't posted it, I would have likely forgotten it. Anyways, this thread is over three hundred pages. If you think I'm going to sit down and read each and every one that's pretty assinine. I don't have hours upon hours to waste doublechecking to see if Random Forum Personality X maybe brought up my point in over three hundred pages of what is mostly back and forth. Instead of acting like I'm ruining your life by NOT reading all this material, you could politely say something along the lines of "Page 204, check there." or "I believe that topic HAS been covered.". There's not exactly a table of contents on this monstrosity, so I don't see the point of bitching when someone brings up a point again.
But that is an excellent way to greet any and all opinions, no doubt. "Hey, I have an observation." "Check the three hundred page thread, n00b stfu!"
Someone's taking this a little too seriously.
Originally posted by Wesker
I was just putting something forth because it crossed my mind and if I hadn't posted it, I would have likely forgotten it. Anyways, this thread is over three hundred pages. If you think I'm going to sit down and read each and every one that's pretty assinine. I don't have hours upon hours to waste doublechecking to see if Random Forum Personality X maybe brought up my point in over three hundred pages of what is mostly back and forth. Instead of acting like I'm ruining your life by NOT reading all this material, you could politely say something along the lines of "Page 204, check there." or "I believe that topic HAS been covered.". There's not exactly a table of contents on this monstrosity, so I don't see the point of bitching when someone brings up a point again.But that is an excellent way to greet any and all opinions, no doubt. "Hey, I have an observation." "Check the three hundred page thread, n00b stfu!"
Someone's taking this a little too seriously.
Not me hopefully. I don't take too many things seriously.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Someone's in the knowledge I was referring to them with my "read the thread" comment.Secondly, I deduct credibility points because you used leetspeak.
-AC
leetspeak in the context of using it as a parody of those who use it commonly is perfectly acceptable.
It's when you use it all the time as your normal way of writing that's bad and severely annoying.
I make fun of leetspeak all the time by using it, sarcasm is great fun. It doesn't make me incredible, just incredible. (That's gold, i dont care what anyone says)
Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
Why is this thread still being argued all that can be said has been said a million times here.