[QUOTE=]Originally posted by FeceMan
I can't tell if you're making a joke. The laws of nature are physical laws. The laws of morality aren't physical. They don't say "you can't," they say "you shouldn't."[/QUOTE]
Do they say "You should not have sex with members of your own gender?", do they say "A fetus (despite medical disagreement) is a human and should have the same rights as in the other moral absolutes I consist of, meaning, it shouldn't be aborted"
Does it say "A person should not be brought into a harmful situation by another human being except when it comes to pregnancy because it is their own fault then and although they should have a way out, I, the moral absolutes, say she cant use it, cause I am the moral absolutes and I can say that, though no one knows why, cause...really, it's just a matter of opinion, even I, the moral absolutes, don't get why I should be absolute, but heck, some people do, so why not."?
[QUOTE=]Originally posted by FeceMan
Oh, come on, you know the answer to this one. 'Sides, I'm not going to derail this thread further with a religion discussion.[/QUOTE]
Wow, if you can't even answer those questions how can you even debate about it.
And it is a fact that I do not know the answers to these questions, for one, because they are fundamentally flawed and contradictory.
Well, I mean I can't force you to answer, but let me ask another one which is important:
Even assuming that your God made us....your God made everything...and he gave us free will....why are his moral standards absolute? Just because he created it? Come on...that's bullshit and you know it. My girlfriend and I could make a baby...does that mean everything we say about it is absolute and right and unchangeable?
In case you become fair again here's the questions I would like you to answer:
No I don't, so please answer "how would they come about, where are they, what are they, who made them, why were they allowed to make them, why are the absolute, why aren't mine absolute, does the person that made them have to accept them, can they change them, where do we find them, are they certainly against abortion? Why? Why does everyone have different opinions on them? Etc" point by point so I can show you how it is flawed.
[QUOTE=]Originally posted by FeceMan
Simply because one doesn't feel regret does not make it wrong. If I take an infant from its mother and throw it in a meat grinder, my action was wrong. I might not feel guitly about it, but there is no question as to the morality of what I have done. I might even feel pleased with myself for turning a baby into dogfood--but that doesn't make it right. [/QUOTE]
Why was it wrong to kill the infant? Why? On what absolute standard that applies to everyone is it wrong?
Why are there so many sets of morals?
How do you know, that killing an infant, isn't in fact, the highest form of morality? How do you know, that we shouldn't all kill infants? I mean, some seem to think that that is the right way to go...why are your wishes and your conscience to be seen as the absolute and not theirs?
On topic:
We are discussing whether this:
should have the same rights as these
Think you anti-freedom (choice) morons. THINK!
YouTube video