Originally posted by chillmeistergen
You think it's wrong. The woman who it is may not, and what right do you have to try and alter an opinion by law? Soon people will want a law, on how many people you're allowed to have sex with.
Also, having sex isn't a medical procedure.
Originally posted by FeceMan
Slippery slope fallacy. Also, I'm not altering the woman's opinion--I'm saying, "No, you can't do that."Also, having sex isn't a medical procedure.
You don't think the woman in question should be entitled to an abortion, because she is a '****'. Having a law preventing her from having an abortion is directly saying, 'what you're doing is wrong'. That would be trying to alter opinions using legislation.
Having sex can lead to medical procedure, so if you want an abortion according to your proposed laws; get raped, don't have sex.
Originally posted by FeceMan
Slippery slope fallacy. Also, I'm not altering the woman's opinion--I'm saying, "No, you can't do that."Also, having sex isn't a medical procedure.
i notice a pattern in which you point out how a particular system is abused (fair enough) but then seem to suggest that the system is the cause. sluts will get 8 abortions per year, ghetto/trailer park queens will rape our system of welfare, the rich will get away with murder, literally, through their right to choose (buy the finest) representation in court while poor people get stuck for crimes they may not even have committed, someone may squander and declare bankruptcy as per their prearranged plan for beating the system, doctors moving off-shore and never paying their federal aid for medical school, frivolous lawsuits...
...there are so many systems/solutions/allowances which help many, yet are abused by a few.
i just feel its equally fallacious to parade the habitual-abortion-having gutter whore as it is to bring up such a slippery slope.
"(...) only women can get pregnant and only women would ever have to carry an unwanted fetus to term that I find it laughable that anyone claims being anti-choice has anything to do with concern for potential life. Can anyone really believe that abortion would even be an issue if men had to face the possiblity of giving birth to and raising a child because of one night of failed contraception?
I think Florence Kennedy said it best: "If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrement."
web.mit.edu/pro-choice
Wow, the amount of times I've seen this topic discussed in forums seems to be never-ending.
But my opinion...
I'm neither with or against, although having said that, I'm probably more on the against side because I strongly believe that there only a few mere exceptions to such a decision - such as rape, incest, etc.
But the bottom line in all of that is to use protection if possible.