Abortion

Like... for example... perhaps... maybe...

...a certain mentally deficient poster who signs of each post with "JM"?

Or someone who has a thing for pirates!If you want this thread closed so badly why don't you talk to Backfire about it?It is that simple.jm

Everybody should be entitled to abortions.

'No, no-one. fetuses are human, unless their dad is a rapist. Or they have a disease, or are German.'

No, abort any of them.

'No.'

Yes.

The abortion thread digest (Past and future).

How did you pick that name for your username anyway Von?jm

All the others were taken.

I see.Talk to you later.Got to get to work.jm

lol

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
first time for everything, I guess.

What is so funny?jm

Originally posted by Bardock42
No, look, the problem is that he generally debates with you....or JM. That really, decreases the need to ever admit you are wrong considerably.

Martyr complex.

Is that the best you can do? Martyr complex? you do realize that a Martyr cannot be among the living, right?

It's called an idiom.

Damn. JM looks like she has Down syndrome in her avatar.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
It's called an idiom.

I would not bel surprise if you do.A debate is a debate.Why do you liberals take it so hard when you ca'nt think of a resopd to any answears pro-life people have?jm

I've come to a conclusion:

Pro-Life is the wrong term for people who claim to be such. Hell, I'm pro-life. I don't like abortion either. But I would never take that choice away from somebody. The Supreme Court decided in 1973 (Roe v. Wade) that a fetus is not a person and has no constitutional rights. And when it comes down to it, that's the only thing that matters when it comes down to it: Religion or religious beliefs have no legal sway in this country. The law is the law. And the Supreme Court is the final interpreter of the law.

My point is: I am pro-choice. I am also pro-life. So the new term that I choose to bestow on those who claim to be "pro-life" is this: Anti-choice. Too long has this myth of "pro-life" and "pro-choice" being separate been perpetuated. I know of no one who is anti-life, but what are the "religious right" trying to imply with their use of the term "pro-life"? It's a fallacy.

All people who are against women's right to choose are now designated "anti-choice"

Have a nice day 😊

hmmmm....pretty good insight there.

Bah, I just noticed that I made a syntactical error too.

😂 dammit, there go my delusions of eloquence

...

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Semantically "anti-choice" as illustrated above, is a more accurate terminology to describe people who wish to overturn Roe v. Wade, since the direct opposites of both "anti-abortion" and "pro-life" aren't applicable to the diametric opposition. People who are "pro-choice," are not "anti-life" nor "pro-abortion," they are accurately described as in support of the right to choose.