Abortion

Originally posted by Bardock42
And a fetus isn't either.

Just a matter of definition, really.

No, a fetus is alive (so is sperm), more importantly, a fetus will develop into a human life if allowed, unlike sperm, which was the angle I responded too.

Originally posted by Robtard
No, a fetus is alive (so is sperm), more importantly, a fetus will develop into a human life if allowed, unlike sperm, which was the angle I responded too.

A sperm will too, if allowed.

The point is you draw a line at a sperm and an egg connecting, why not draw the line before that? You say that an embryo or a fetus will develop into a human if left alone, but that's wrong. It has to be fed, it has to be protected, it is just a minimal step from that to a sperm having to be brought to an egg.

Same thing really.

Stupid argument.

Originally posted by Bardock42
A sperm will too, if allowed.

The point is you draw a line at a sperm and an egg connecting, why not draw the line before that? You say that an embryo or a fetus will develop into a human if left alone, but that's wrong. It has to be fed, it has to be protected, it is just a minimal step from that to a sperm having to be brought to an egg.

Same thing really.

Stupid argument.

Because until they connect, there is no "human life in development", that's why. A sperm or egg by itself is not the same. Yes, feed through the mother... yes, protected in the sense that the mother must be protected.

No, not the same thing.

The stupid argument is implying that they're one and the same.

Originally posted by Robtard
Because until they connect, there is no "human life in development", that's why. Yes, feed through the mother... yes, protected in the sense that the mother must be protected.

No, not the same thing.

The stupid argument is implying that they're one and the same.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Nah, you just decide when it counts and when it doesn't.

No... the facts do. Sperm by itself or an egg by itself is not the equivalent of a developing fetus, implying it is foolish.

Originally posted by Robtard
No... the facts do. Sperm by itself or an egg by itself is not the equivalent of a developing fetus, implying it is foolish.

The argument disputes the sacredness of the fetus, not the existence 🤨

Originally posted by Bardock42
No, of course not, a fetus is the equivalent of a fetus.

The argument disputes the sacredness of the fetus, not the existence 🤨

When did it say or imply "sacredness", you silly bastard?

Originally posted by Robtard
When did it say or imply "sacredness", you silly bastard?

Bardock42 seems to believe he's the only intelligent life form in this planet. Ahahaha 😛

He has all the symptoms of what I call a 'Limp Dick' 😂

He has to compensate and project an image in this board that he's an intellectual bad-azz... 😛

Originally posted by RUNMAN
Bardock42 seems to believe he's the only intelligent life form in this planet. Ahahaha 😛

He has all the symptoms of what I call a 'Limp Dick' 😂

He has to compensate and project an image in this board that he's an intellectual bad-azz... 😛

Originally posted by Bardock42
When did it say "sperm" is a "fetus", you odd dummy.

You implied they were equal, it started when you said "A sperm will too, if allowed" and then continued with the following drivel-posts, you pompous nit.

Originally posted by Bardock42
And you figure you are the only one that ever noticed that (assuming it is true) in my almost three years here?

It's a restatement of a truism... 😄

Originally posted by Robtard
You implied they were equal, it started when you said "A sperm will too, if allowed" and then continued with the following drivel-posts, you pompous nit.

Originally posted by RUNMAN
It's a restatement of a truism... 😄

An assumed truism, to be correct.

Originally posted by Bardock42
No, I implied that the argument is applicable, too. I stated it is an empty argument. Really, nothing said. You....french......gay....person.

An assumed truism, to be correct.

Yes, I agree, precision is indeed key 😉

Originally posted by Bardock42
No, I implied that the argument is applicable, too. I stated it is an empty argument. Really, nothing said. You....french......gay....person.

An assumed truism, to be correct.

B-but it isn't applicable; that's the point, you empty argument making buffoon. French!? That was uncalled for.

Originally posted by RUNMAN
Yes, I agree, precision is indeed key 😉

Originally posted by Robtard
B-but it isn't applicable; that's the point, you empty argument making buffoon. French!? That was uncalled for.

Originally posted by Bardock42
With precision you feed me?

Man, you're a riot! 😂

Originally posted by Bardock42
No, the initial argument is not applicable.

It started initially when I said a sperm is not a fetus; comparing the two is foolish, which you agreed with, you bobble-head.

Originally posted by Robtard
It started initially when I said a sperm is not a fetus; comparing the two is foolish, which you agreed with, you bobble-head.