Originally posted by DarkSaint85
You are giving Saitama's feats to Bang, lol. Let's quote you, and let me add my sentence. Spot the difference!"I think the only confirmed speed feat in the Flash Forward storyline is when Wally West is faster than the Speedforce. WW has tried to tag/hit/outrun WW on multiple occasions but has been utterly humiliated every time.
Batman/Deathstroke was able to hit an angry Flash, though, which is quite impressive".
I'm giving Saitama's feats to Saitama, and Bang's feats to Bang. Bang avoiding a hit from Saitama is a feat that can be attributed to Bang. Whether it's due to superspeed alone or a combination of superspeed and reading of the opponents intentions, it nevertheless demonstrates Bang's ability to avoid superspeed attacks.
By your criteria, the only admissible feats when assessing an X vs. Y fight would be from the other instances of that same X vs. Y fight? That's hardly how any argument on these forums works; ppl almost always use feats from some X vs. Z fight to imply what might happen in the X vs. Y fight in question. The thing is, Marvel and DC comics are highly inconsistent -- which is why we cannot cherry-pick just the low feats or high feats as suits our purpose but must be impartial. Flash, for example, certainly has the high feats to largely compensate for an occasional low feat, so we can conclude that on the average he wouldn't get hit by Batman or Deathstroke. Bang doesn't really have low feats; he has been extremely consistent with his demonstrations of superspeed and reading of enemy attacks (including superspeed attacks), and the ability to avoid or block them. So that's the power level where he should objectively be placed at.