Ant-Man and The Wasp: Quantumania

Started by StiltmanFTW6 pages
Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
Indeed, but that's a little different.

Exactly the same 😂

You're like Kang's biggest fan, having as many different personas as he's had.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Exactly the same 😂

You're like Kang's biggest fan, having as many different personas as he's had.

I don't change my powerset, goals and personality with new incarnations Stilt. I'm still the same old pure as the Snow from Narnia Whirly! 🙂

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
I don't change my powerset, goals and personality with new incarnations Stilt. I'm still the same old pure as the Snow from Chernobyl Whirly! 🙂

Fixed it for you.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Ain't nobody (who is not a loser) got time for the verses forum. And it's not true, I have posted one or two things mocking the forum. lol

But if it's nothing but sodomy going on in that forum, maybe I need to reconsider my participation there!! 😂

Welcome to the Losers Club, then.

Seeing how every KMCer is a versus poster and you choose to interact with us every day 😂

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Welcome to the Losers Club, then.

Seeing how every KMCer is a versus poster and you choose to interact with us every day 😂

I'm more interested in discussing movies, not "my dad can beat up your dad" childishness.

But i suppose such childishness helps explain some of the popularity of comicbook superhero movies.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
I'm more interested in discussing movies, not "my dad can beat up your dad" childishness.

But i suppose such childishness helps explain some of the popularity of comicbook superhero movies.

apart from very few, nothing explains most comic book movies success.

Serious inquiry: Is MODOK a throwaway, goofy character for comic presence or is he a legitimate badass who is an actual threat?

Originally posted by Impediment
Serious inquiry: Is MODOK a throwaway, goofy character for comic presence or is he a legitimate badass who is an actual threat?

He’s been both.

Originally posted by Impediment
Serious inquiry: Is MODOK a throwaway, goofy character for comic presence or is he a legitimate badass who is an actual threat?

he's both, however in this he seems to be an asset for Kang

Originally posted by Impediment
Serious inquiry: Is MODOK a throwaway, goofy character for comic presence or is he a legitimate badass who is an actual threat?

For this movie?...not sure

but he's been both in comics. It's the more recent stuff that's turned him into comedic presence.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
I'm more interested in discussing movies, not "my dad can beat up your dad" childishness.

But i suppose such childishness helps explain some of the popularity of comicbook superhero movies.

99.99% of Movie forum activity happens in the Movie Versus Forum section 🙂

Originally posted by Kazenji
It's the more recent stuff that's turned him into comedic presence.

No, he's been like that during the nineties, too.

In the end, he is fully capable of being both, as you, Riv and Bruce said. Depends on who is writing the story.

Too early to say what he'll be like in MCU.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
99.99% of Movie forum activity happens in the Movie Versus Forum section 🙂

^^^H1 math. 😱

Originally posted by Robtard
William Jackson Harper is playing a character named "Quaz", so likely yes.

If so, will trigger certain types as Harper is a Black man 🙂

If I were a betting man... I'd have money down that "Quaz" is a fakeout and that WJH is actually playing Reed Richards.

Maybe a version of Reed that got trapped in the quantum realm and is now leading forces against Kang.

Fantastic Four movie comes out a couple months ahead of Avengers Kang Dynasty, and given the Kang/Reed connection, it feels like Marvel is burying that lede here... since the Richards are part of that Kang "Dynasty"

Originally posted by riv6672
^^^H1 math. 😱

No, elementary school math 😎

H1 would post a shitload of equations that had nothing to do with the topic at hand.

I wanna see Kathryn Newton go inside Kang and come out of him..

hopefully that happens

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
No, elementary school math 😎

H1 would post a shitload of equations that had nothing to do with the topic at hand.


^^^You got the same outcome as him but didn’t show your work. 😆

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
No, he's been like that during the nineties, too.

In the end, he is fully capable of being both, as you, Riv and Bruce said. Depends on who is writing the story.

Too early to say what he'll be like in MCU.

Didn't know about the 90's stuff, I've only seen him for the recent stuff where they've turned him a joke.

I’m def. getting this! 😆

https://books.disney.com/book/look-out-for-the-little-guy/

Anyone seen this yet? Released here today. Its being slated in reviews as one of the worst MCU movies. Only the 2nd to be rated rotten on RT