Eternal Sunshine of Guy222's and Rao's Minds (v2.0)

Started by cdtm186 pages
Originally posted by Smurph
lol, dumbass

Lol.

If only. Consider the first the dream.

The fact is the oppressed happen to be the biggest spenders. Blacks alone spend like 4X of the average cracker, and black women tend to control the money (And women are the most frivolous spenders on earth)

Tbh I don't get the beer and target thing.

But if they were the norm no one would pander to lgbtq.

Originally posted by steverules_2
It’s a shame really, Keaton as Batman again was a huge selling point for me but I don’t like Ezra Miller. I disliked him well before people realised what an unhinged piece of shit he is.

Same. Even on screen he seemed like an insufferable doughbag.

Originally posted by steverules_2
It’s a shame really, Keaton as Batman again was a huge selling point for me but I don’t like Ezra Miller. I disliked him well before people realised what an unhinged piece of shit he is.

Same. Even on screen he seemed like an insufferable douchbag.

Looks like he isn't even Jewish!

His father is Jewish and his mother is of German and Dutch descent. In Orthodox Judiasm, the mother must be Jewish for the children to be Jewish, if the mom is not yet the father is, that isn't officially recognised.

Of course one can convert, but he never has. And there are reform branches and such, but that doesn't seem to apply here either.

Not really relevant to his character just something I ran across that I thought was interesting.

https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-features/ezra-miller-the-flash-timeline-arrests-controversies-abuse-1234765089/

Wow.

Literally every incident makes me fantasize about beating him to death.

Jerry Seinfeld groomed a 17-year old girl when he was 38. Why the hell would you reference him given the context of this conversation? [/B]

https://www.thethings.com/the-truth-about-that-time-jerry-seinfeld-dated-a-17yearold/

So unless we're calling him a liar, he met her at 17 but waited until she turned 18 before intimacy.

Now, if they first met when she was 18 you'd have no problem with it?

https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/nobodys-soft-crime-anymore-rethinking-americas-impossible-problem

Criminologists have begun to see alienation and lack of hope for whole groups and classes of people as the causes of crime. When the poor see the rich getting richer and their own social possibilities blocked, they develop frustration and rage at a life in which the future has no meaning. Any attempt at solving the problem of criminal violence must consider this rage and alienation, as all successful crime prevention programs have done.

COLLECTIVISM!!

America is a country founded on individualism. We believe in self interest, nay SELFISHNESS, to ones self and ones family, and NO ONE ELSE. There is NO COMMUNITY, there is only ME, MYSELF, AND I.

If the poor are angry at the rich, that's their problem. If crime is up because of "hopelessness", that means they're WEAK LOSERS.

Lock them up.

This country has lost its way.

Originally posted by cdtm
https://www.thethings.com/the-truth-about-that-time-jerry-seinfeld-dated-a-17yearold/

So unless we're calling him a liar, he met her at 17 but waited until she turned 18 before intimacy.

Given your whataboutism about the Catholic church despite the well-documented systemic pedophilia within it, I have no interest in educating you on what grooming is.
Originally posted by cdtm
Now, if they first met when she was 18 you'd have no problem with it?
The arbitrary implication you're making here about me insults my intelligence.

Now do yourself a favor and shut up when you speak to me.

Originally posted by ODG
Given your whataboutism about the Catholic church despite the well-documented systemic pedophilia within it, I have no interest in educating you on what grooming is. The arbitrary implication you're making here about me insults my intelligence.

Now do yourself a favor and shut up when you speak to me.

The line between 17 and 18 is arbitrary. Treating a 17 year old like an 8 year old is entirely arbitrary.

Speaking of arbitrariness;

I own my double standard with the church and Hollywood. What's your excuse?

You have no problem condemning an entire religion of millions yet you defend the Harvey Weinsteins?

As a Catholic, it's hard not to see this;

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/17/hamtramck-michigan-muslim-council-lgbtq-pride-flags-banned

..and point out no Catholic organization caused a similar thing.

Which you'll of course try and spin as my dumping on Muslims, instead of pointing out Catholics as a group are unfairly stigmatized as Nazi's.

I also fully believe even one community of majority Muslims does not speak for all Islam, or those who follow it.

Originally posted by cdtm
The line between 17 and 18 is arbitrary. Treating a 17 year old like an 8 year old is entirely arbitrary.
Sure, if you’re 17-20 yourself. Look ant dis guy defending a nearly 40-yr old man grooming a minor. Old Man Pedo 2.0 rite here.

New Topix.

I've been thinking about expert opinion, and the relevance of opinions outside of their field. For example, if someone cracked the human genome, wouldn't his opinion on, say, how we should all be taking the Vax carry some weight? As cracking the genome proves a level of intelligence that could apply to logic and reasoning?

Am uninterested in responses.

Sorry interested. That was a typo. A typo I want to keep because it's a funny one.

Originally posted by cdtm
Speaking of arbitrariness;

I own my double standard with the church and Hollywood. What's your excuse?

You have no problem condemning an entire religion of millions yet you defend the Harvey Weinsteins?

What in any of my posts suggest that I’d support Harvey Weinstein? You couldn’t care less about predators/groomers like Kevin Spacey, Bryan Singer, Jerry Seinfeld who I brought up but somehow I’m the enabler?

You owned up to a double standard? So you’re ok with Catholic priests diddling toddlers while their bishops move them around to diddle more toddlers but you draw the line at Hollywood moguls?

Even a broken A.I. Russian bot could not be this goddamned stupidly, hypocritically unself-aware of themselves. It takes a one-in-a-million talent to be so imbecilic.

Originally posted by cdtm
New Topix.
You’ve got about as much self-awareness as Old Man Pedo! to think that you can brush off the heinousness of your personal opinions and viewpoints.

Piece of trash.

You likely wouldn't hesitate to point out how attacking Islam over the acts of some Muslims would be an attack on a moderate Muslim, yet think nothing of attacking Catholicism to a Catholic. THAT is the double standard.

You're so.deep into the anti-evangelical partisanism you don't even see it.

^ You’re conflating pointed attacks on your own character with global prejudice against culture. You aren’t the paragon of Catholicism.

You’re a piece of sh1t.

Don’t conflate your personage with an entire religion/culture /population o to hide/excuse your perverse defects and flaws.

You really can't see how the way you're talking about Catholics could offend the Catholic in front of you

^ It’s funny because if I were to tell you about my family’s faith, that might serve to short-circuit your opinion that I am prejudiced against Catholicism.

But I don’t need to do that to point out how moronic you are. You aren’t the phucking Pope. Stop hiding behind your self-projected reverse-persecution to excuse your own deformed imbecility.