Jonathan Majors arrested for Domestic Violence

Was prolly trainin for Creed IV.

Stilt and DisneyWalker are racing to see who gets their brown eye poked by Majors first.

Jonathan Majors seems to be innocent from what has been said/shown.

Would be something to see his version of Kang time travel to ancient Egypt to try and adopt a young Apocalypse only for it to backfire like in the comics.. Imagine if that was how they brought Poccy into the MCU.

Originally posted by Psychotron
Unlikely. This entire phase is built around his shitty version of Kang.

Highly likely, Wouldn't be the first time Disney has done a kneejerk reaction to someone's incident and firing them before the truth is revealed.

Originally posted by Kazenji
Highly likely, Wouldn't be the first time Disney has done a kneejerk reaction to someone's incident and firing them before the truth is revealed.

If she has wounds and she's recanting her story, then something is definitely not right here.

Let the police investigate and see.

MCU will be fine, at worst they'll just recast Kang.

Of course. At least there will be that it worse comes to worst, but Barry Allen cannot and will not be recast because WB lacks the ethics/principles to do so.

Probably comes down to $$$ and the optics of firing a mentally ill person, which comes back to $$$.

So Majors released some texts that he received from his girlfriend that are supposed to prove his innocence.

https://thedirect.com/article/jonathan-majors-girlfriend-text-messages-innocence

“It was my fault for trying to grab your phone”

Jesus. That's like textbook domestic abuse victim mentality. And yet Majors thought this was a good idea to share? It makes me almost certain he is guilty now as well as that he's totally fcuked in the head.

Originally posted by Robtard
Probably comes down to $$$ and the optics of firing a mentally ill person, which comes back to $$$.

https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/2023/11/13/5icpi9mo73d21z0rzl846bl5vjts9n

So I guess they couldnt recast Kang after all. 😬 I know initially giving Majors the benefit of a doubt aged poorly, but damn, Kang deserved better than to be moved on from prematurely, which put the MCU in an awkward position after all they had planned with him.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/2023/11/13/5icpi9mo73d21z0rzl846bl5vjts9n

So I guess they couldnt recast Kang after all. 😬 I know initially giving Majors the benefit of a doubt aged poorly, but damn, Kang deserved better than to be moved on from prematurely, which put the MCU in an awkward position after all they had planned with him.

And who can blame them. Remember the huge HUGE backlash when Edward Norton was recast?

And he wasn’t one tenth as big an actor as Majors.

Edward Norton was a Hulk nut on top of that. More knowledgeable of the character and comic history than most people on the planet, and he made a lot of creative corrections to the 2008 film because of it. I just got the impression that Disney didnt like the idea of having someone that passionate about the character they play, so they replaced him with Mark Ruffalo. Norton was the perfect Banner/Hulk through and through though.

Can probably blame the lukewarm reception to the 2003 Hulk for the 2008 one not doing as well as it couldve. 2003 was a guilty pleasure standalone, but prolly shouldnt of happened for the betterment of Hulk in the long run.

Still, I wouldve thought theyd just recast Kang if nothing else. He deserves better than to be prematurely moved on from, but fair enough.

Well, either by luck or by design, they did leave themselves an out regarding Kang during the epilogue of the Loki S2 finale.

Spoiler:
There's a scene at the end where TVA members are discussing Kang variants and references the one who got defeated in Quantumania but also remarks that none of the other Kangs are aware of the TVA and that they're essentially under control for the moment.

Originally posted by Ridley_Prime
Edward Norton was a Hulk nut on top of that. More knowledgeable of the character and comic history than most people on the planet, and he made a lot of creative corrections to the 2008 film because of it. I just got the impression that Disney didnt like the idea of having someone that passionate about the character they play, so they replaced him with Mark Ruffalo. Norton was the perfect Banner/Hulk through and through though.

Another person currently like that is Ms Marvel herself Iman Vellani, A while back she called out Kevin Fiege on the MCU's universe designation.

And the Russos, of course.

What's all this revisionist history regarding Edward Norton and The Incredible Hulk?

Norton was a major land for the role, but he's become the new Dustin Hoffman, the antagonistic method actor a-hole who can't work well with others. He basically got himself kicked out of the MCU with his un-team like behaviour, and his film was always just meh to begin with.

Originally posted by roughrider
What's all this revisionist history regarding Edward Norton and The Incredible Hulk?

Originally posted by roughrider
What's all this revisionist history regarding Edward Norton and The Incredible Hulk?

Norton was a major land for the role, but he's become the new Dustin Hoffman, the antagonistic method actor a-hole who can't work well with others. He basically got himself kicked out of the MCU with his un-team like behaviour, and his film was always just meh to begin with.

👆

Hell, let's be honest. Ang Lee's Hulk with Eric Bana was better.

Norton was bland as fuck and is suffering from some serious delusions of grandeur.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
👆

Hell, let's be honest. Ang Lee's Hulk with Eric Bana was better.

Norton was bland as fuck and is suffering from some serious delusions of grandeur.