Originally posted by Robtard
Hela can just tear X-24 apart, if she gets tired of slapping him around, as nothing in the films suggest Logan's skeleton is linked together. He's closer to his Ultimate Marvel version and the Hulk casually tore that Logan into two pieces.Or just crush his skull via her crushing feats.
That's not how she fights. Even if she did fought that way then your argument is stilled flawed. You are commiting the "Boards don't hit back" fallacy.
X24 isn't going to let her do those things. He would be swiping at her. He can cut her hand off if she's not careful (you think he's just going to let her grab him without incident lmao)
You are arguing with a bias viewpoint. One character stands there while the other character does what they want. You have to be more objective here.
I know that Hela can win. But x24 has one shot chances. He's the underdog but he can possibly win due to her underestimating him.
Lastly adamantium is superior to Mjolnir anyway from feats.
Originally posted by h1a8
I just proved that your logic is flawed. Being many times stronger than someone in fiction doesn't mean automatic win. If you have claws that bypass durability, unbreakable skeleton, great HF, and good skill then you can one shot a lot of beings that are vastly stronger.That was a stupid argument.
The only thing you have proven so far is that your an idiot. Movie Logan has zero feats of him beating a character leagues above him in physical superiority such as Hela. The logan were talking about gets ko'd by bullets and the likes of Sabertooth.
As usual, you have once again lost another debate. Its time for you to take the dunce cap and go sit in the corner.
Originally posted by tkitnaWhy do you need feats of beating beings far above in strength?
The only thing you have proven so far is that your an idiot. Movie Logan has zero feats of him beating a character leagues above him in physical superiority such as Hela. The logan were talking about gets ko'd by bullets and the likes of Sabertooth.As usual, you have once again lost another debate. Its time for you to take the dunce cap and go sit in the corner.
His claws can one shot much stronger opponents.
That's a fact.
All he need is the opportunity to apply the claws.
The only way he loses to a stronger is if the stronger can somehow put him down before being gravely sliced.
Stop being stupid.
Originally posted by h1a8
Why do you need feats of beating beings far above in strength?
Because you brought it up. Insanity I tell you.
His claws can one shot much stronger opponents.
That's a fact.All he need is the opportunity to apply the claws.
The only way he loses to a stronger is if the stronger can somehow put him down before being gravely sliced.Stop being stupid.
Proof or shut up. Where in any movie that he has been in has he downed a character on Thors, Helas, or Hulks level?
This person dissagress with H1, this person thinks Hela would win the lion's share of the matches and that's a match win for Hela:
Originally posted by h1a8
He can is different than he will.
X24 can be her due to her underestimating him. If she knows everything about him then it's spite. But I think Hela is skill enough to prevent losing her head or limb most of the time.
X24 beats her like 3-4/10
Originally posted by tkitna
Because you brought it up. Insanity I tell you.Proof or shut up. Where in any movie that he has been in has he downed a character on Thors, Helas, or Hulks level?
That's not how proving a character win works.
There are many ways to prove that a character can win against a stronger character without them actually beating a stronger character in the movie or show.
For example, Logan can stab or slice Juggs in the neck and kill him. He doesn't have to have shown that specifically to Juggs. He's done that countess times to others.
Originally posted by h1a8
That's not how proving a character win works.
There are many ways to prove that a character can win against a stronger character without them actually beating a stronger character in the movie or show.
By assumptions and making things up right? We're all to familiar with you doing that.
For example, Logan can stab or slice Juggs in the neck and kill him. He doesn't have to have shown that specifically to Juggs. He's done that countess times to others.
Proof that he can stab and kill a character on Juggernaut, Thor, Hulk, or Helas level.
Originally posted by tkitnaIf you can prove that a weaker character can win by another means (not being stronger) then that character can beat a stronger. Only idiots argue "character A is much stronger and therefore character A wins."
By assumptions and making things up right? We're all to familiar with you doing that.Proof that he can stab and kill a character on Juggernaut, Thor, Hulk, or Helas level.
They have no stab resistance feats, especially from a metal that can slice 6in wall of steel like it was a sheet of paper.
Hell, IM was going to stab Thanos with a titanium alloy.
Originally posted by h1a8
They have no stab resistance feats, especially from a metal that can slice 6in wall of steel like it was a sheet of paper.
Hell, IM was going to stab Thanos with a titanium alloy.
Thors been stabbed quite a few times and its never put him down. Helas been stabbed and it did nothing. Do you see where your argument fails now?
X-24 or Logan cannot put down one of those characters.
Originally posted by tkitna
Thors been stabbed quite a few times and its never put him down. Helas been stabbed and it did nothing. Do you see where your argument fails now?X-24 or Logan cannot put down one of those characters.
So you admit to beings able to be stabbed and cut.
Logan just has to apply it in a vulnerable area (hence my initial argument).
Neck, slice arm off, etc.