Greek Myth Heroes vs Christian "Heroes"

Started by Robtard4 pages
Originally posted by RJ 2.0
Demigods are stronger than archangels?

Regarding these fictional characters. The answer is "yes".

Originally posted by Robtard
Gabriel was definitely being hurt during the fight, while he's tough, he's not immune to damage.

LoL, nope. You should probably watch the films again, because Perseus was taking hits to the face from Ares' sword and it didn't leave a mark. He felt it and it hurt, but he took it. Ares then used Perseus' face to break stone and Perseus survived.

LOL dude they're not stronger than angels. Definitely not stronger than archangels. Pull your head out of your ass.

But hey, let's say, for argument's sake, they are at least as strong as archangels. If that were the case, which it's not, what would happen to Perseus if he were to take an RPG to the face? Or if he were strafed across his chest with machine gun fire? You've been dodging that the entire threat. Now answer the damn question. But before you answer that, what was Achilles killed by? Mortal weapons fired by a mortal man. And we all know that 9 mm bullets<>>>mortal arrows.

And ask yourself this: name the instances when Gabriel or Michael were genuinely injured in battle? Noticeably so? It was from another angel with....... Wait for it....... An archangel blade &#128513;

This debate is over. You've been beaten. You've been outdebated at every turn.

First of all, I am not talking about Achilles, he's just human in his film. I am talking about Perseus, who is half god.

Second, I made a demigod vs archangel match to address that fight: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&postid=17738074#post17738074

Dude, now you're just trolling. Give it up. A demigod cannot defeat an archangel. Archangel blade, dude.

Originally posted by tkitna
They are poser God's compared to the real true God. Like I said, I don't believe the Lord would ever allow Michael to lose to them.

I do understand and get where your coming from with feats and all though.

You can't use your personal beliefs from real life and claim they are "false gods".

I am agnostic, they are all "false gods" deities created by man to give meaning and understanding to events and things they did not understand.

They are all real gods in they're own universe.

Well at least this topic started some fire 🙂

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
You can't use your personal beliefs from real life and claim they are "false gods".

I am agnostic, they are all "false gods" deities created by man to give meaning and understanding to events and things they did not understand.

They are all real gods in they're own universe.

Even if you don't believe, you have seen or should know what the wrath of the true Lord brings and what he thinks of other 'false Gods and idols'.

Originally posted by tkitna
Even if you don't believe, you have seen or should know what the wrath of the true Lord brings and what he thinks of other 'false Gods and idols'.

The Greek/Roman God's were worshipped for 1,000 years before Christianity was invented. By that logic isn't the "True Lord" the false God?

To the ancient Greeks their gods from Apollo to Zeus were as real to them as the the Abramhic god is to Jews, Christians and Muslims.

But we're talking about fictional movie characters here...

Originally posted by KingD19
The Greek/Roman God's were worshipped for 1,000 years before Christianity was invented. By that logic isn't the "True Lord" the false God?

Sure they were worshipped before Christ walked the earth, but Jesus spoke and taught about the Father dismissing them. Some Greek God's are even mentioned in the Bible.

Speaking of false Gods, we know what an archangel can do to a false God. All you have to do is watch Supernatural. Lucifer wipes the floor with about a dozen of them. Sheeva, Odin, and many others. And LOL he's not even as strong as Michael.

Being false gods in the Supernatural universe doesn't mean they're false gods, or weak in others. Just like Satan's power can vary depending on the film or franchise he/she's in.

What are yall not understanding, these are movie characters, whatever the Bible says literally has nothing to do with what the characters in that movie universe can do

Unless it's specifically stated or shown on film that a character has the protection of film "God", that's not a usable feat.

eg The Blues Brothers were on a "mission from God" and had God's protection to save the orphanage. Eli from the Book of Eli was under God's protection to deliver the NKJB/himself to Alcatraz. Stated and shown.

Bane

Originally posted by Robtard
Being false gods in the Supernatural universe doesn't mean they're false gods, or weak in others. Just like Satan's power can vary depending on the film or franchise he/she's in.
Pagan Gods, I meant to say.

Originally posted by KingD19
The Greek/Roman God's were worshipped for 1,000 years before Christianity was invented. By that logic isn't the "True Lord" the false God?
I have a theory on this.

Originally posted by Robtard
Unless it's specifically stated or shown on film that a character has the protection of film "God", that's not a usable feat.

eg The Blues Brothers were on a "mission from God" and had God's protection to save the orphanage. Eli from the Book of Eli was under God's protection to deliver the NKJB/himself to Alcatraz. Stated and shown.

I understand what your saying and am not trying to debate, but God was never going to let Michael fail so he was under God's protection. Yes he allowed Gabriel to technically kill him, but it was planned that way.

Originally posted by tkitna
I understand what your saying and am not trying to debate, but God was never going to let Michael fail so he was under God's protection. Yes he allowed Gabriel to technically kill him, but it was planned that way.

It wasn't that he wasn't going to let Michael fail. Michael was his favorite and the only Angel with the balls to stand up to God when he was out of line. His entire plan was to test the Angels and see if they were willing to stand against him when he did the wrong thing, and Michael was the only one who did.

That's why when Gabriel killed him, God revived him as an Archangel and let him go back to Earth to save the baby. He never planned to kill off humanity. He only wanted to see if his Angels were truly faithful to him or just Yes Men who only did what they thought he wanted, not what he actually needed. Michael explains this in the movie. Gabriel even leaves in shame after Michael puts him in his place.

Originally posted by KingD19
It wasn't that he wasn't going to let Michael fail. Michael was his favorite and the only Angel with the balls to stand up to God when he was out of line. His entire plan was to test the Angels and see if they were willing to stand against him when he did the wrong thing, and Michael was the only one who did.

That's why when Gabriel killed him, God revived him as an Archangel and let him go back to Earth to save the baby. He never planned to kill off humanity. He only wanted to see if his Angels were truly faithful to him or just Yes Men who only did what they thought he wanted, not what he actually needed. Michael explains this in the movie. Gabriel even leaves in shame after Michael puts him in his place.

Yes and well said. My point though was that Michael was doing what God wanted and what God needed and God was never going to allow him to fail to save the baby.