Ultron vs. Thanos

Started by 9jaboy3 pages

Originally posted by NemeBro
Amazing that someone can go into this thread and say "What is Ultron's defense against the snap?"without coming to the much more reasonable conclusion of "What is Thanos' defense against anything Ultron can do"? Ultron's head beam will cut Thanos in half far quicker than Thanos' fat ass can snap his fingers and if you think Thanos is tanking that from a full-powered Infinity Ultron when using the full might of the stones once crippled and badly wounded him from its backlash you're delusional.

And what makes anyone think the snap would even work on him? Name a single character half as powerful Thanos has killed with it. Infinity Ultron overpowered and tanked the Watcher, who per Strange Supreme has the cosmic power to stop and reverse the collapsing timeline he created.

Speaking of Watcher and Strange Supreme those characters would also roll Thanos with the Infinity Gauntlet pretty easily.

Infinity Ultron stomps.


Where's this guy getting that Ultron is this speedster that's so fast. Just because he hit a what if Thanos' that didn't even engage him?
Infact at one point he couldn't even hit a single one of
the guardians for an extended period of time ,that he had to use the time stone to slow them down.

Ultron is not hard to hit even by human level speed lol.

Thor's hammer took his arm off, what's protecting him from a snap?

If the stones are the same, The mind blast isn't cutting MCU Thanos in half. It didn't cut Ultron in half in AOU or Vision in infinity war. MCU Thanos is far more durable than both.

Originally posted by 9jaboy
That would also mean Party Thor is = Thor 1 😆
MCU Thor is capable of launching CM to another Country with a hit with Mjonir . 😆

Party Thor's history is very different given he didn't grow up with an adopted brother - Loki.

We can literally see the difference in physiology of his Loki, who again has had his childhood changed.

That said, I see no reason why MCU Thor and CM wouldn't be able to smack each other around the Earth. Even though I agree that Party Thor definitely seems > MCU Thor. Not sure about MCU Stormbreaker Thor though (but again this is going off topic).

But in principle my point is correct. God Loki from his solo series clearly ends up being Massively more powerful than MCU main Loki. However up until Avengers1 they were exactly the same. Hence why when the series started we realise MCU Loki was able to use TK and energy blasts which we didn't know prior to the series.

Originally posted by 9jaboy
I'm sure you're not lying, you just missed this; If Ultron acquired Vision's body and was still on earth it means the Avengers lost, Ultron took over Earth, which means , Tony and co didn't fight off Thanos, Thor too. Check what if widow's universe.
So again not the same,
You're notorious for interchanging What if character's feats with MCU. Stop it brah.

I said "Up to the point where Ultron met Thanos". Ergo up until IW. So not sure why you're bringing up Tony & Co. fighting Thanos.

Yes I am because they're "What If's". They are part of the MCU Multiverse. There's a clear correlation there, even if things diverge very differently after a certain choice.

On the other extreme if you're going to treat them as completely different beings with no relation to each other at all, then you will have to answer if you see IW and Endgame Thanos completely different also, and count their feats as completely separate (Endgame Thanos did not go through the IW war events, and his timeline has clearly diverged from the MCU 616 Thanos at the point of the start of GOTG1).

One thing is certain: MCU characters don't share the feats of "What If...?" characters, as they clearly operate at different power levels (e.g., Thor).
MCU Thanos is significantly more durable than "What If...?" Thanos, as he isn't going to get cut in half by the Mind Stone.

IMO, snapping is the only way MCU Thanos wins. However, I could be wrong, as some of you are making good points.