Resident Evil: Apocalypse [merged]

Started by chelsea2422 pages

i loved the second one the first was alright not the very best 😬

Originally posted by Red Superfly
The zombies in Resident Evil are UNDEAD - by definition they are zombies.

Resident EVil actually took the zombie "crap" and made it somehwat scientific and added that extra edge of realism that made it somehwat disturbing (these are the game I'm on about here). It was a virus used for miliatary applications that gave humans enhanced strength and so on, but it killed the brain dead, leaving the corpse to rot while the brain had basic motor functions. They were dead, decaying corpses moving around. They were zombies.

The plots for the games were brilliant, they could have just turned the games into movies and everyone would be happy.

Two Resident Evil movies, and no Albert Wesker? Seriously, it's getting beyond a joke.

Weskers plot line alone is ten times better than the crummy films.

Nemesis was also a brilliant enemy in the games, he was scarier than Tyrant, and made you jump and sh*t your pants everytime he cried out "Staaaaaars!". Movie Nemesis is utter crap.

Alice? Alice? Who the f**k is Alice?

I wish Mr. Anderson would stop re-writing franchises and stop infuriating fans - after all they are the only ones who bother watching these movies.

where did you hear that this t virus was made to make them stronger?

where did you hear that this t virus was made to make them stronger?

the t-virus was created to augment the physical capabilities of the test subjects, those being strength and durability among others.

Originally posted by pr1983
the t-virus was created to augment the physical capabilities of the test subjects, those being strength and durability among others.
and where did you hear this, cause i was to understand that it was to just make bio genetic monsters that would make a undebatable army.

and where did you hear this, cause i was to understand that it was to just make bio genetic monsters that would make a undebatable army.

that was the intended result of the enhancements.

Originally posted by pr1983
that was the intended result of the enhancements.
yea but they knew they were making zombies and monsters, not making them stronger. cause lets face it but those zombies are no Arnold

zombies was an accident, the monsters were deliberate. tyrant was intentional, like dogs and sharks and such. the zombies were an unexpected side-effect.

Of course it was awsome!! I really loved it, are you still online?

u talking to me?

i hated it.

the zombies are purely meat shields for the more advanced creatures... larger numbers can bring fatigue to even the most elite special forces (excluding alice and those superhuman types). Im referring to the regular humans like chris and jill (in both the games and the movie)

The film concept was great and some of the action sequences made me laugh but the acting was piss-poor, the fighting sequences were way too cutty and the script had the worst dialogue of any movie id seen, some of the lines actually made me laugh out loud because they were so bad.

Originally posted by pr1983
zombies was an accident, the monsters were deliberate. tyrant was intentional, like dogs and sharks and such. the zombies were an unexpected side-effect.
well i don't know in all the game i have played and all the books i have read i have never heard they were meant to be stronger people. but maybe your right.

tyrant, the t-90 and the nemesis were built to be super soldiers. they used human body parts that were augmented, or they used human test subjects to create them. u can only improve something so much before it mutates into something else when u use the t/g - virus.

Nemesis was the guy who survived in the 1st movie wasn't it?

Originally posted by pr1983
tyrant, the t-90 and the nemesis were built to be super soldiers. they used human body parts that were augmented, or they used human test subjects to create them. u can only improve something so much before it mutates into something else when u use the t/g - virus.
i ment nothing was just made stronger yet still normal. i now that tirant and Nem were made strong but yet still was mutated.

does it really matter???
the film is still dire with no substance what so eva

i ment nothing was just made stronger yet still normal. i now that tirant and Nem were made strong but yet still was mutated.

of course, but the mutation was seen as a way of improving on humans, thats what i meant.

Originally posted by pr1983
of course, but the mutation was seen as a way of improving on humans, thats what i meant.
They made the zombies first with no intention of them being more incredible then normal people, but once they learned to manipulate it they learned they could make stronger things like you say.

as far as i know (going by the games), the zombies were an accident, they were the result of the outbreak

Originally posted by pr1983
as far as i know (going by the games), the zombies were an accident, they were the result of the outbreak
hmmm.. well maybe. i was to believe that it was to make them not feel pain and that, so really they were saposta be zombies but not rot and that, but still i think when you said it would make them stronger, i got lost lol.