Al versus Murtaugh..

Started by Rogue Jedi4 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
I used screen feats, sir. Murtuagh has a weakness, he always pauses to do that stupid head-rotation move. This can/will be exploited.

I recall you consistently saying "give it up" in the Riggs s McClane thread. As it turns out, you've admitted you were dead wrong all along.

Hmm, I dont recall him using the head rotation move when he fought Jet Li. He only uses that when he shoots his gun, and there is no gun here.

Rog has a height advantage.
Rog has a reach advantage.
Rog has a speed advantage.
Rog is in better shape.
Rog has a way higher damage soak.
Rog kicked ass onscreen.

"On screen feats" = on screen h2h fights. Rog has them aplenty, Al has none, unless you count him downing an entire box of twinkies as an on screen feat.

Math is good, what else ya got?

LoL, NOW you're playing the "screen feats" rule, when it was nowhere to be found in your argument in the Sideswipe Vs Bumblebee thread, you silly bastard.

Fair enough though, Murtuagh wins. Unless Al mistakes Murtaugh for a chocolate covered twinkie and eats him.

Chocolate covered twinkie haermm

OK, lets switch gears here, gun battle? Each armed with a .357 wheel gun, in a dunkin donuts? To give Al a chance here, they are fighting over a dozen bear claws.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Chocolate covered twinkie haermm

OK, lets switch gears here, gun battle? Each armed with a .357 wheel gun, in a dunkin donuts? To give Al a chance here, they are fighting over a dozen bear claws.

Going by screen feats, Murtaugh still wins, obviously.

Now be a man and admit your argument in the SS V BB thread was faulty, going by these same rules you're applying in this thread, which would be the valid rules of the forum.

Originally posted by Robtard
Going by screen feats, Murtaugh still wins, obviously.

Now be a man and admit your argument in the SS V BB thread was faulty, going by these same rules you're applying in this thread, which would be the valid rules of the forum.

Faulty how? SS fought h2h onscreen, Al didn't. If Al pwned Karl with his fists instead of his gun, then he would have a chance here.

Zero onscreen feats, dude.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Faulty how? SS fought h2h onscreen, Al didn't. If Al pwned Karl with his fists instead of his gun, then he would have a chance here.

Zero onscreen feats, dude.

Because SS's onscreen feats where inferior to BB's. SS has one minor feat, BB has them in spades, it's that simple.

Same logic you applied here, Al had one screen feat, Murtaugh has them in spades (haha, I did go there).

Amazing how you'll apply the rule, only when it fits you. Be a man, there's no shame in conceding you were wrong.

Wrong how? I took SS's one fight and used it as an argument. IMO, he is faster than BB, and his blades will cut BB to ribbons, that's my argument.

You know full well I admit openly when I have been proven wrong.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Wrong how? I took SS's one fight and used it as an argument. IMO, he is faster than BB, and his blades will cut BB to ribbons, that's my argument.

You know full well I admit openly when I have been proven wrong.

Screen feats tell us otherwise. So.

Sometimes, dude. SOMETIMES. Be a man.

Exactly, and SS had a screen feat to work with, see how that works?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Exactly, and SS had a screen feat to work with, see how that works?

No, not exactly. SS had one minor screen feats showing he could kill a Transformer who was speeding away from him in car form. BB has multiple ass-kickings vs multiple opponents.

Logic dictates BB would win. Or just apply the same logic you used here, in this thread, to deduce that Murtaugh would beat Al.

-Murtaugh has more/better screen fighting feats, ergo, Murtaugh > Al.

-BB has more/better screen fighting feats, ergo, BB > SS.

Like you said, "math is good." Be a man.

BB is a better h2h combatant as far as punching and kicking go, but CAN he take down SS? CAN he avoid SS's blades? And IF SS connects with his blades, CAN BB's armor hold up?

Let's talk about it there.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
BB is a better h2h combatant as far as punching and kicking go, but CAN he take down SS? CAN he avoid SS's blades? And IF SS connects with his blades, CAN BB's armor hold up?

Let's talk about it there.

Murtaugh is a better h2h combatant as far as punching and kicking go, but CAN he take down Al? Can he avoid Al's Katana/crowbar/baseball bat/pitch fork? And IF Al connects with his weapon, CAN Murtaugh's body hold up?

See. This is why "onscreen feats" take precedence over fanboyism. It's silly to ignore it in that thread, yet swear by it in this one. Be a man.

And who's to say Murtaugh wont have the katana? See, Murtaugh showed his ability to use his surroundings when he stabbed Jet Li. Al never showed this.

See, when I asked who would win in a h2h battle to the death out of Rambo and Huo Yuanjia, you say Huo, why? Rambo killed more h2h than Huo. Explain.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
And who's to say Murtaugh wont have the katana? See, Murtaugh showed his ability to use his surroundings when he stabbed Jet Li. Al never showed this.

See, when I asked who would win in a h2h battle to the death out of Rambo and Huo Yuanjia, you say Huo, why? Rambo killed more h2h than Huo. Explain.

Murtaugh is taking this simply because he showed more onscreen feats and is proven. Same as BB Vs SS, BB win because of his onscreen feats. Just apply the same logic, it's not hard. Be a man.

I don't recall. I also don't know who Huo is, off the top of my head.

Originally posted by Robtard
Murtaugh is taking this simply because he showed more onscreen feats and is proven. Same as BB Vs SS, BB win because of his onscreen feats. [b]Just apply the same logic, it's not hard. Be a man.

I don't recall. I also don't know who Huo is, off the top of my head. [/B]

Enough with the BB/SS shit, wrong thread.

Huo is Jet Li's character in Fearless.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Enough with the BB/SS shit, wrong thread.

Huo is Jet Li's character in Fearless.

This is more about applying the rules across all threads; not just when it suits your argument, than it is about BB Vs SS. Be a man.

Okay. He could beat Rambo. His onscreen feats showed him to be a more capable fighter, unless you made pro-Rambo settings to dictate the win.

So Huo takes it because he displayed himself a more skilled fighter, yes?

BTW, Dutch just pwned the Predator, and the DVD didnt skip even once.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
So Huo takes it because he displayed himself a more skilled fighter, yes?

BTW, Dutch just pwned the Predator, and the DVD didnt skip even once.

From what I can recall of that shit movie, he did. He also displayed some super-human like abilities, no? Whatever you're getting at, the fact remains that BB showed himself to be the better fighter, over SS. Be a man.

Good. I got a bad batch of DVD's. Made 10 coasters for a friend last week. Damn Taiwanese brand.

Well, IMO SS showed himself to be a more efficient killing machine wth his one feat.

*hums Raiders of the lost Ark theme*

Yes, that was a hint.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Well, IMO SS showed himself to be a more efficient killing machine wth his one feat.

*hums Raiders of the lost Ark theme*

Yes, that was a hint.

By killing an opponent in car form who was fleeing, ie not fighting back. Just apply the same rules, it's not hard. BB would win. Be a man.

*hums you're not applying the same rules in both threads*