Guinness says the biggest age gap in a marriage is 83 years!
Made me think, what's everyone's over under rule when dating?
Whats the biggest age gap you've ever had and at your current age how far under over will you go?
I dated a 15 year old while i was 17, and a 51 year old when i was 22. Once i turned 18 i wouldnt go under. When i hit 20 and above as long as they were 18 i was cool with it.
I married by 25 so i unfortunately never got to reach dirty old man status.
My rule though was old enough to vote/never too old.
If I wasn't married (or if I was another type of guy)...
- I don't think I could date someone young enough to be my daughter. Being on the other side of 40 though, I find that women in their 40s are the best blend of youth and experience.
- When I was younger, I did have a fling with a woman 10 yrs my senior. She was also married (separated), and she was also the smallest woman I ever dated, @ 4'10.
__________________
Shinier than a speeding bullet.
I'm married so the question is moot. I always had very little patience with people much younger than me, so I guess the limit would be around 5-8 years younger.
Crossing my fingers so I never have to date people again, that phase of my life was annoying
Scoob is close, but there's actually a formula out there that's become the unofficial guidestick: Age/2 + 7.
Obviously things like maturity and compatibility are more important than age, and there's nothing inherently unethical with a huge age gap. But what we're talking about here is societal acceptance, not morality. Anything outside of Age/2+7, and you can expect some "robbing the cradle" jokes or sideways glances from the more conservative.
I could date multiple women that young cause when I'm that age I'll look like this.
(please log in to view the image)
__________________ "Compounding these trickster aspects, the Joker ethos is verbally explicated as such by his psychiatrist, who describes his madness as "super-sanity." Where "sanity" previously suggested acquiescence with cultural codes, the addition of "super" implies that this common "sanity" has been replaced by a superior form, in which perception and processing are completely ungoverned and unconstrained"
KMC Community Forums
Oct 16th, 2014 11:27 AM
oh, that's bad.
