The Hulkamaniacs have absolutely NO evidence to support Rulk winning...So they reverted to posting Hulk feats...Then Skaar feats...Then just randomly trolling when their BS was picked apart.
IOW, it's your typical Hulk-related thread.
__________________
Last edited by Galan007 on Jun 17th, 2017 at 02:04 AM
So, unsurprisingly, it turns out I was right about who the Original Poster (OP) of the thread that inspired this one meant when he was asking about Red Hulk/Rulk.
He meant "Thunderbolt" Ross, much as I explained.
As for the issue Delta preoccupied himself with, I stand by it.
Most people participating in that thread probably did not realize Marvel Comics has apparently replaced Rulk with someone named Maverick until DarkSaint (DS) mentioned it on page 4. Not me, apparently not Damborgson, and not the original poster of that thread, either. The fact that DS had actually broached that topic before then does nothing to change the truth of what I wrote. He wrote it on page 1 and few people noticed. He wrote it on page 4, when "now" was when the thread was on page 4, and people DID notice it then. And Damborgson and myself responded accordingly:
Most of your examples seem to be of ray blasts, light, heat, energy, etcetera.
Both the ones I featured here below AND the ones I omitted.
These are things that generally are focused or concentrated to produce great intensity. They are essentially variations of Torch's concentration maneuver here at the behest of Spider-Man, the focusing of heat/light/energy, etcetera. Which neither in comics nor in real life is usually expected to do great harm to most of the surroundings:
That's actually relatively easy, despite all the background noise.
I essentially want to know if Red Hulk as he debuted, roundabout 2008, would have defeated Doomsday as he debuted, roundabout 1993, if speed was not a factor and Rulk took Superman's place, or was put in some similar locale.
So far I am coming to the conclusion that Rulk would indeed win owing partly to his greater strength. In particular, on the last few pages, it's the fact that Rulk caused an earthquake measuring a full 9.0 on the Richter scale, and accidentally killed the people of a nearby and/or surrounding village by merely punching his opponent too hard.
By contrast, the blows Superman gave to Doomsday to finish DD do not seem to have caused proportionally many casualties, and the narration of the "sons of Krypton shaking the planet to the core" seem to be a much later retcon added years later to embellish the original Death of Superman tale.
What he means, and what others' (including yours) ignorance is, is nothing to do with me.
I am actually surprised, blue. Shocked, even. That you would hide behind the comfort of a groupthink mentality.
Forum rules are VERY clear. If OP does not specify, we divert to the most recent incarnation (which, if you re-read the thread, I was replying to carver, who WAS using the most recent incarnation).
OP coming back in a few days later (despite having logged in earlier) and clarifying, does NOTHING to alter the forum rules,does it?
It is very clear. We use the most recent incarnation, if the OP does not specify.
You being ignorant, or Damborgy being ignorant, or anyone else is, well....no defence. Neither is it my problem.
But to hide behind 'well, EVERYONE doing it!' is....disappointing.
KMC Community Forums
Jun 17th, 2017 01:41 AM
