Gender: Male Location: Perfect night for hunting lowlife.
Yea it doesn't really look like the stuff that NIST claims to be molten aluminum that was pouring out of the towers. I will never know what happened, i've read the Popular Mechanics interview which was quite extensive on debunking Loose Change, but there was still big unanswered questions. Mainly WTC 7, which until explained logically will always make me question 911.
You didn't say ANYTHING about glowing orange or white in your "explanation" the first time. Here's the post to jog your memory:
See, no mention of "glowing orange" or "glowing white", just "glowing"...
If that was such a selling point to your argument, why didn't you mention that earlier? I'm not trying to instigate, but if it was so important, why didn't you mention it before instead of waiting until now?
And btw, this doesn't look orange to me... (please log in to view the image)
That's not what you quoted the 1st time though is it? You might want to check what you actually quoted because it says exactly the same as what i'm saying now.
I didn't think I had to stipulate the glowing orange part given that Steven Jones does.
Pretty silly that Steven Jones would argue that it can't be molten Aluminium coming from the building that originated from the plane by saying that molten Aluminium doesn't glow orange when it actually does.
Even worse when he says it's thermite despite the fact that thermite has a far more violent reaction than what you see on the footage of the world trade centre.
Not to butt in too much, but that's exactly what anyone would assume he meant by "glowing" when he was referring to molten metal. I could be wrong, but a molten metal that glows goes hand in hand. Almost all metal glows when it's molten and VERY hot.
It's almost white.
Besides, do you know you're arguing with a chemist?
Other than that particular point, I'm enjoying your posts in this thread, as well as Jaden's. You guys have lots of insight.
KMC Community Forums
Aug 18th, 2009 03:47 AM
