It was during the tweet storm related to the plane incident. It's not my fault that you and that other poster have such poor memories that you don't remember the events surround that situation.
I'll be nicer to you and explain context.
She just so happened to comment about how Ivanka deserves to be yelled out, during the tweet storm, surrounding the incident.
"No, I wasn't tweeting about the incident where she was yelled at on the plane. It is unrelated." Yeah, nice timing and your tweet just so happened to be specific enough that it clearly applies to this incident.
The portion you quoted of my post clearly indicates this. If she didn't mean the plane, then she would have specified that in her tweet.
Why do you think she even got called onto the show? It's quite obvious she backpedaled.
Now pay attention, lad:
Incident occurs December 22nd when Ivanka is traveling with her children on a plane:
Twitter storm ensues shortly after that. People, conservatives, are crying that she should be left alone on the plane with her children. Holiday traveling. etc. Twitter storm starts.
Lauran Duca wants attention and capitalizes on the twitter storm (at the time, hash tags abound such as #ImWithHer and #Trump form the conservative camp...yes, people were "I'm with her", "her" being Ivanka) by posting her topical tweet on the 23rd:
She absolutely loved getting on national television, by the way. She tweeted about it very shortly after Fox News discovered that a "journalist"[Lauran Duca] said Ivanka should not be let off the hook because Ivanka is poised to be powerful. This is what she wanted.
And when confronted about her obviously sexist (and perhaps racist) and rather stupid tweet about wanting Ivanka to be harassed on the plane, she backpedaled and said no one should be harassed on the plane. Anyone who is going to pretend Lauren Duca did not capitalize on the Ivanka plane issue and will act like her tweet was "in general, not specific to the plane issue" is definitely being dishonest. But, hey, someone who would support Lauren's dishonest backpedaling on Tucker's show is clearly a dishonest person, themselves. It's very obvious what she was talking about. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out. But almost a year later, yes, I'm sure people forgot the context of the situation.
Since it wasn't trolling, and you gave it a troll rating, I give your intelligence a 2/10, if I'm being kind.
No, he's just an idiot that doesn't deserve my time. Consider yourself lucky I responded to you.
LOL! Do you truly believe the nonsense you type? Just curious, like...you legit believe it?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
DDM was handling him just fine, he didn't need me one bit to make Nemebro look like a moron. I just thought it was HILARIOUS what he said. And yes, it lacks self awareness. You see he thinks he is clever because he feels if he points out I'll say that it somehow negates that or makes it untrue. It's adorable if he thinks it works.
Just look at the shit he types, he truly convinces himself he has "owned" people in the past and that is why they laugh at him lol. That in itself is priceless. I look forward to another post from him. it will either be a long post full of pseudo-intellectual garbage with him insisting he totes destroyed me or a short post calling me a "phaggot". Or perhaps a medium sized post with a combo of both.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Uh, why? Nothing in her tweet alludes to the plane, in fact, she specifically makes something completely separate from the airplane incident the focus of her tweet. As people reading her tweets can presumably read, they should be able to get what she's saying from the tweet.
Because Tucker wanted ratings, and what better way than to mischaracterize a liberal as a nutjob by accusing her of saying something she never said.
None of the hashtags referred to the plane incident, the context you're arguing for here doesn't exist.
Additionally, it's nonsensical to think that posting a tweet a day after a story in a 24 hour news cycle automatically makes that previous story the focus of your tweet when the story isn't mentioned or alluded to anywhere in what you tweet. The only valid source of evidence for your claim here is the tweet itself and what the tweet says. Up until this point, none of this has been remotely relevant to what you're trying to prove. If you want to justify that she argued something she's explicitly said she didn't argue, it's up to you to prove that based on what she tweeted, nothing else.
Oh?
Let's look at the actual tweet:
^^^^Nowhere is the plane incident alluded to. Nowhere does she support Ivanka being harassed. Nowhere does she say anything about people "yelling" at her.
You've got no basis to claim that she was talking about the plane incident much less what she was saying about the plane incident. The only comment she ever makes on the plane incident is on Tucker's show which was:
"no she shouldn't have been harassed".
Based on what she has said, she is against harassing people on a plane, which means Tucker was mischaracterizing her argument to make her appear stupid and you just endorsed that.
Yea, she did, because calling out Tucker on an idiotic witch hunt he embarked on likely increased her popularity among those capable of reading.
He most certainly did not. Not even close. I read 5 similar arguments denying the same thing in his post. Only an idiot or a troll would believe Lauren didn't aim her tweet at the plane incident.
"...let her off the hook..." is specifically regarding people crying that she shouldn't be harassed on the plane. She said that to directly cause trouble and conflict with the conservatives and conservatards upset over her being harassed with her children, during holiday travels, on the plane. She did it on purpose. She is a shit stirrer.
Deny it all you want, that's exactly what she meant. And when Tucker called her onto the show to call her out for being a despicable person, she backpedaled.
You believe her lies because you're a troll or an idiot. I don't believe her lies because I'm neither.
Boom. owned. #takeyourasstomommy #hurdurhastags
Edit - In her interview, you can see the moment she fully commits to the backpedal:
"...But where do those protections end..."
"protections" referring to the social graces of not harassing a mother on a plane
And she seemed quite ready to argue "my tweet didn't talk about that at all, actually" when Tucker brought it up,again. She fully prepared to make the counter-argument and deny her atrocious comments.
She was still on the fence in her Tucker "interview" in the beginning because she's still questioning the "protections" a plane riding mother should have from harassment in the beginning of the interview.
She had no fully committed to her crafted backpedal until Tucker pressed her further on what a piece of shit she is. And you can see the moment she goes from being calm and collected to being a huge asswipe: when Tucker calls her out on her sexist and borderline racist comments about Ivanka smelling good. If a man said that about a coworker, at work, he'd be written up or terminated for sexual harassment. Tucker was right to call her out on that bullshit.
__________________
Last edited by dadudemon on Oct 20th, 2017 at 04:13 AM
^ Nuh uh I'm not even gonna slog through that huge block of text.
I follow her on twitter, that tweet in context was part of a series of tweets addressing the liberals who saw Ivanka as a balancing force. Lauren was warning that Ivanka should not be trusted or looked up to
And I searched through 2 weeks prior to the 'incident' tweet...holy hell, she's a horrifically shallow and narcissitic person. But she mentioned Ivanka one other time. And we already saw that tweet. It was about Ivanka "having it all."
Fuk you got me. You caught me red handed or might’ve just misinterpreted what I said??? Which I understand in this case, I wasn’t very clear.
By series of tweets I didn’t mean hers, I meant liberal Twitter. The sentiment was circulating around the liberal clique at the time. If you’ll remember, there were massive crowds of liberals outside Trump tower and Ivanka’s businesses, participating in a rally designed to appease Ivanka Trump specifically. They were holding signs like “Stop your father” and “Fight for Women’s rights”. Behaving as if Ivanka Trump was like Luke Skywalker in Star Wars, the last hope to stop the evil empire.
Essentially, liberals were trying to appeal to Ivanka because they thought she’s kind of on their side. She’s moderate, sensible, has left-leaning sensibilities. Some liberals even trusted Ivanka.
So Lauren Duca was one of many saying that just because Ivanka seems like she’s great, it doesn’t mean she’s trustworthy or deserves our lenience.
And no where in the tweets does she indicate public harassment is okay, you’re just presuming the subtext of a completely unrelated tweet. Like Tucker Carlson, you’re a bickering buffoon. Only yours is naive, Tucker’s buffoonery is intentional.
Can someone link me to liberal twitter? Thanks in advance!
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
KMC Community Forums
Oct 18th, 2017 07:41 AM
