"Freedom breeds inequality. Unless you have freedom to be unequal, there is no such thing as freedom." - William F. Buckley, Jr.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Yes it is, just like he didn't deny other baked goods to the couple. They could have bought food when they were there, he just said no to making a wedding cake, not we don't service gay couples here.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Okay so there it is. He refused to make the design they wanted because he felt it conflicted with his religious beliefs. This shouldn't have even gone to trial, it's ridiculous.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Depends on the type of equality.
If you're talking about equality under the law, then yes absolutely that shouldn't be infringed upon, but equality under the law isn't a form of equality that forces a concession on liberty, rather it is conducive to liberty, and they are not principles in opposition to each other here.
Equality of access to private services is much more sketchy, less compelling a case on principle, and less fundamental a principle than either equality under the law or freedom of speech, so if equality of access to other people's private services is weighed against freedom of speech, freedom of speech is absolutely more important because to censor or compel someone's speech with force is absolutely a violation of their natural rights, and a private business discriminating... not so much. A person has much more entitlement to their own words than a person does to somebody else's labor.
And lastly if you're talking about equality of outcome... equality of outcome is flat out immoral and is the principle behind Marxism. If you were to way freedom and equality in economics, they are most certainly not equal principles. If you have a completely unregulated economy, total economic freedom, you might think that's not desirable, you might think it abandons too many people, but it would certainly be a favorable system to the complete opposite end of the spectrum in a communist state for example, whereas the extreme of economic liberty may leave a minority of people miserable, the extreme of economic equality makes everyone equal in how miserable they are.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
Yep, they so often confuse equality of opportunity with equality of outcome.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
So hey, can I go in a muslim bakery and demand a cake that says "Jerusalem has been and always will be the capital of Israel" ?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
And if I did, and they said no, you'd insist they do it, correctamundo?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
And then no cake for this situation then. Dems da breaks.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
"Jesus is better than Muhammad". If they refuse, force them?
"Muhammad married a child". This is fact. Refusal allowed?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Guys, Rocky has spoken! All those dead and beaten gays, past, present, and future! Who cares about them! Because Rocky says so: the mere social constructs that result in our brothers and sisters being persecuted, beaten, and killed are irrelevant.
Whew, glad Rocky settled that for us.
MAGA, amiright, Rocky?
__________________
Last edited by dadudemon on Dec 8th, 2017 at 02:12 AM
How do people subscribing to a hateful ideaology make being gay an act of hate on religion?
It's nonsensical you expect us to feel a dude's religious rights are being impeached on because of his religion's hateful past.
Gay people did not attack christanity, chritianity attacked gay people. Any relationship between religion and gays has been the result of religious people constructing one
Fair enough. So would you agree that if discrimination involved basic human needs like say housing or water, it wouldn't be ok?
And lastly if you're
I'm not going to go into depth about this since I lack sufficient knowledge about Marxism, but are there historical examples of a totally free market economy you're comparing to a totally equalized one? I can grantee you America is not an example of a fully capitalist economy.
And from what I recall from sophomore history, full blown free market economies resulted in mass child labor, mass starvation, and mass famine. And even those countries weren't completely free market.
Last edited by Rockydonovang on Dec 8th, 2017 at 03:45 AM
KMC Community Forums
Dec 7th, 2017 08:21 PM
