Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Yeah that was great, really helped him ascend further up the Lobster Dominance Hierarchy
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
Because women are generally irrelevant in society.
Hope i helped.
__________________
They are angry because they have been forced to recognize that their hour has arrived; that the time has come to surrender power to Shimrra and the new order."
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
I’d have to agree with this. It’s a hard task to find comparable cases of women-led genocide and wars because women have historically held few positions of power due to their lower societal status. I’m sure if women had always been socially/culturally equal to men, allowing them to rise in the ranks of political hierarchies, they’d have led a similar number of murderous campaigns throughout history. But now that that inequality is mostly remedied in the western world, we’ll likely start to see more egalitarian-represented war crimes in the future. Yay progress!
Masculinity is invasive, femininity is invitational. It's amusing how the most fundamental biomechanical sex differences play out similarly in the bedroom and on the geopolitical world stage. Female leaders are more likely to deride their own nations by inviting a swartheswarm of migrants and opening her country's thighs (and sometimes her own thighs) to receive the impudent cock of a dusky totem.
You don't know shit robtard. Jim basically left the red-pill/Manosphere/Game blogosphere almost basically lives a cosy existence in a nondescript home in the tri-state area with his Mid-atlantic Americana wife who drives a volvo with five seats in the back. Jim was the sole writer of "Roissy". The Chateau Heartiste is written by 10-15 (sometimes more) different content aggregators, including yours truly.
__________________
Last edited by JMANGO on May 9th, 2018 at 12:02 AM
Assuming that is true, then wouldn't there be more fighting if Women ruled everything?
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
European queens waged more wars than the kings and more frequently. Ranavalona I who ruled Madagascar was responsible for the murder of 75% of her population. Isabella I of Castile waged war with Muslim Moors and killed or enslaved hundreds of thousands or tormented to death.
Wu Zetian was one of the most ruthless rulers of China who even killed her own infant daughter and killed anyone who threatened her rule. Queen Mary I of England killed thousands of Protestants.
It wasn't that hard of a task to find comparable cases of women-led genocide and wars. I can add to the list if that would help.
That's not genocide, that was the contemporary outcome of a multi-year war. But there's nothing in the text to support hundreds of thousands being enslaved and/or tormented to death. And I think you're way way over estimating the population of the Moors in Spain at that time. Considering the Moor population was in the hundreds of thousands during that time period:
The point wasn't addressing just genocide. And even when we're talking about something that was led by a man, like the Holocaust, even womenplayeda huge role in ensuring that the Holocaust happened.
Because no one would follow them. No man ever created attrocity on a global scale without a ton of support.
__________________ What CDTM believes;
Never let anyone else define you. Don't be a jerk just to be a jerk, but if you are expressing your true inner feelings and beliefs, or at least trying to express that inner child, and everyone gets pissed off about it, never NEVER apologize for it. Let them think what they want, let them define you in their narrow little minds while they suppress every last piece of them just to keep a friend that never liked them for themselves in the first place.
1. You are moving the goalposts. You're discussing a red herring with me that I did not bring up, originally. This is your topic. Your argument. So I'm helping you argue with yourself.
2. A more accurate interpretation is what I quoted. Based on that, a much more accurate statement would be that female monarchs' states were more likely to be attacked if they were unmarried and if they were married, they were more likely to participate as attackers. That's not your orginal point. Here is your original point:
"European queens waged more wars than the kings and more frequently."
False.
Your first link does not support your claim. Your second link provides no citation and has questionable truth to it. Likely, you're a victim of the pro-Christian European propoganda that was flying around about her because of her anti-Christian stance.
Nothing in there says she was responsible for the murder of 75% of her population. Thankfully, you cannot go back and edit your post. But this is what you said:
The direct ordering of deaths or indirectly through executions that violated her decrees? Thousands, for sure. But no where near 75% of the population as you claimed. That's still not genocide and that's still not razing an entire city to the ground, murdering the entire population.
To remind you, this is what you said:
"Ranavalona I who ruled Madagascar was responsible for the murder of 75% of her population."
That's a massive False.
You're 0 for 2.
So, again, what I said is correct. And you're 0 for 2 on proving your points.
Not only did you not prove your points, your points were proven false.
Roll your eyes, but now I have a much better grasp of the type of person you are. You cannot be trusted. And you go out of your way to lie. Thanks for letting me and the rest of the forum know that you're dishonest and not a credible person to have any sort of discussion with.
But I guess you just bypassed that bit of information and tried to misinterpret what exactly was being said. I'm not sure how you do math, but when something increases percentage wise, that means there's more of that thing happening. Woman in power saw a 27% increase in wars compared to the reign of a king.
Your second point, I fail to see how that's mutually exclusive. "Women rules say 27% increase in wars!" "YES! But if they were married they were the attackers!" And that's disproving the point....because?
From the link:
Not hard to read. Sources
Klein, Shelley. (2003). The Most Evil Women in History. London, England: Michael O’Mara Books Limited.
Laidler, Keith (2005) Female Caligula: Ranavalona: the Mad Queen of Madagascar. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Stradling, Jan. (2008). Bad Girls: The Most Powerful, Shocking, Amazing, Thrilling and Dangerous Women of all Time. New York, New York: Metro Books.
What was my point, then, and why do you feel your point is relevant to my point?
Because they were married and were not the sole rulers of the nations. There were almost no King Consorts in the "study" which directly invalidates your point.
Already countered with this:
As to your other sources, it does not state what the blogger claimed about the millions. You're wrong. At best, you fell for some unsubstantiated hyperbole. At worst, you're falling victim to centuries old propaganda that came from Christian-European states in the 1800s. Similar propaganda machines that made us think Napoleon was short.
Yes, quite convenient that you posted false information to support your agenda and you actually still did not address my points. You've proven you don't even understand my points.
KMC Community Forums
May 8th, 2018 04:10 PM
