Originally posted by CreshoskSo you read imbetween the lines and saw what you WANTED to see vs what is actually there?
"Why is he being portrayed as peak human?" <- by who? The opposition obviously. 🙄
"Why are you exagerating our arguments?" <- our arguments.And I didn't say that you said that we said he'd get tired fast. That's the part where you implied it. "He not peak human"
We didn't say that he was peak human.
And then you confirmed it anyway by saying I said he'd get tired fast. 😛
Can't follow the trian of thought very well can you? 🙂
Classic.
Originally posted by Tha C-MasterNo, the seeing what you want to see is what you do.
So you read imbetween the lines and saw what you WANTED to see vs what is actually there?Classic.
Though I'm flattered that you take the time and interest to respond to my posts, even though you lie to other people (except for the interest part) about why you don't respond to theirs. 🙂
Originally posted by CreshoskNo i have been busy, but i needed some time.
No, the seeing what you want to see is what you do.Though I'm flattered that you take the time and interest to respond to my posts, even though you lie to other people (except for the interest part) about why you don't respond to theirs. 🙂
So answer my question all you are doing is mirroring, I never said it, so you have nothing to prove. Simple as.
"Why is Spiderman being portrayed as peak human?"
fallacy of the complex Question: arguing based on a response, or assumed response, to a complex or "loaded" question.
The assumption here is of course that Spiderman IS being portrayed as peak human. Now since you are objecting to his portray as such the implication is that the opposite side is portraying him as peak human.
Then you go on to mention his metabolism.
"He has superhuman metabolism."
Implying of course and response to the theorum that Spiderman will tire after a fight, "like a boxer gets tired they get slower and sloppier"
You even attacked the analogy "He's not a boxer."
When no one said he was. no2
So, then I state that You are exagerating our arguments.
"Why is he being prortrayed as peak human?"
No one said he was. So you WERE actually implying that we said that he would tire fast. (Because you inderectly stated that we were prortraying him as peak human.)
When we never said that. Not once.
Originally posted by brainchild81Don't remember. 🙁
Oh. I see what you meant now.Didn't you agree that Spidey could win a while back on this thread? How do you think he'd pull it off?
I thought about the suffocation thing, but then I had recently read Jubilee's origin's after the Generation M thing. . . so to cheer myself up I started reading about her from the begining. . and that's when I remembered that suffocation wouldn't work, seing as how his healing facotr sustained him for days before.
Still, direct blocking of airways is alot faster than crucifixion. Webbing would do just fine. Might take a good deal longer than it would to kill a norm, but it would eventually work. Wolvie should be in the next dimension before the webbing starts to dissolve. If not, Spidey just sprays a lil' mo'. Why do you like Jubilee?
Originally posted by CreshoskI still didn't accuse you of it you, "read imbetween the lines"
"Why is Spiderman being portrayed as peak human?"fallacy of the complex Question: arguing based on a response, or assumed response, to a complex or "loaded" question.
The assumption here is of course that Spiderman IS being portrayed as peak human. Now since you are objecting to his portray as such the implication is that the opposite side is portraying him as peak human.
Then you go on to mention his metabolism.
"He has superhuman metabolism."
Implying of course and response to the theorum that Spiderman will tire after a fight, "like a boxer gets tired they get slower and sloppier"
You even attacked the analogy "He's not a boxer."
When no one said he was. no2
So, then I state that You are exagerating our arguments.
"Why is he being prortrayed as peak human?"
No one said he was. So you WERE actually implying that we said that he would tire fast. (Because you inderectly stated that we were prortraying him as peak human.)
When we never said that. Not once.
tell me what I'm implying now?
Originally posted by brainchild81That's the thing though, h'es lasted for days on the cross. . and it's not like the webbing isn't breathable. . . he has used it as a gas mask before. . .
Still, direct blocking of airways is alot faster than crucifixion. Webbing would do just fine. Might take a good deal longer than it would to kill a norm, but it would eventually work. Wolvie should be in the next dimension before the webbing starts to dissolve. If not, Spidey just sprays a lil' mo'.
And I'm not sure that it would kill him before it disolved anymore.
Originally posted by brainchild81I'm not sure. But she's why I like Wolverine. . .
Why do you like Jubilee?
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
I still didn't accuse you of it
"Why is spiderman being portrayed as a peak human?"
Loaded question, and an indirect accusation, because their is the assumption already given that he IS being portrayed as peak human.
Portrayed by who?
The opposition of course. 🙂
Originally posted by Tha C-MasterNothing, you are directly lying now. 🙂
me what I'm implying now?
Originally posted by brainchild81
Storm had teammates there and she wasn't really trying to hurt Spidey. More lightning and she might have f**ked her own buddies up. NC was in awe of Spidey and was also trying to capture Spidey and not hurt him.🙂 No matter how much PIS/CIS was involved, I didn't see any between Spidey and Wolvie in that book. Spidey did nothing to Wolvie he shouldn't be able to. Also, the part w/Colossus&Wolvie shows a bit of the multitasking Spidey's capable of.
dodge wolverine when wolverine's not trying to hurt him? yup... I'd agree to that.
"C-master" so i'm a fan boy because I don't type well? Thats your come back? What?! Dude thats sad...."I'm too good to back up my statements so...I'll....AH a got it!. I'll prove my point by attacking his grammer skills!" HUH!? What does that have to do with it? Or the fact that I have a life outside the bloody internet? (I'm currently on vacation....and no offence ment to anyone....he would attept to make it look that way I have a feeling. Considering its how he has operated so far). Also I apologize to all that have to put up with these arguments between him and I, but I refuse to let this idiot insult me.
Anyway....in response to the PIS stuff. Guys plot line is also affected by readers and censorship...hence Wolverine not killing almost anything he hits. Blades that can cut through anything, he should kill 99% of everything he swings at. You can't block it (with a few exeptions), martialy you prolly can't out fight him and one light swing of the claws can slice through steel. I'm sure a good deal of all of us have accidently slice our hands open on glass while doing dishes or something. That requires little or no pressure and glass can't cut steel...imagine someone who is extreamly trained and strong (by human comparison) swinging these at you at full force......it would kill you....it would kill just about anybody. So in a story eliment they curb this in order to have reoccuring villans and to keep the death lower than what it would be, due to their want/need to market to kids. Granted in the past few years this has become less and less of an issue...but it is still there.