Wolverine vs. Spider-Man

Started by Creshosk1,019 pages

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
He never f*cked Jean. I'm pretty sure they only ever got as far as kissing.
MM. . .you''ll note that I included something else at the bottom . 😖hifty: he has indeed . 🙂

However the question was 616 Wolvie. . HIM I'm not sure about.

Originally posted by The MISTER
Actually I only wish you could back up your statement that these points have been countered before. You can't say that you're unfamiliar with the characters even if you act like you are.
More slothful induction. 🙂

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
When did Wolverine and Storm get busy...? 🤨
Oh yes, 616 Wolvie was only hinted at through outside dialouge. A comment about Wolverine being jealous about Storm spending more time with gambit.

Outside of 616 Wolverine there was a Wolverine that was with a Storm.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Movie is not 616. 🙂

Non-canon material as evidence? ❌ Getting mighty desperate there Mister. . . Mighty desperate indeed. 🙁

Non-canon? Trying to dismiss A movie made in the heart of the special effects era seems pretty shameful to me.

Especially when that movie did a good job of depicting the character according to his given abilities.

Your technical jargon is meaningless when you have shown that you are not familiar with the characters given abilities, take pride in dismissing character bios completely and rest your case within the cliffhanging ever-changing unpredictable comic world. How can you get technical when your evidence is not supported by well known character facts?

Heres a technical term....Denial.

Why did this happen?

It's backed up by character abilities but what do you say?

Originally posted by The MISTER
Non-canon? Trying to dismiss A movie made in the heart of the special effects era seems pretty shameful to me.
The movie is not cannon to the comics. Unless you can tell me about Wolverine taking rogue in under his wing and Jubilee being at the school before wolverine fits in with the comics. . . or any of the other events. . .

Originally posted by The MISTER
Especially when that movie did a good job of depicting the character according to his given abilities.
Sorry, not cannon.

Originally posted by The MISTER
Your technical jargon is meaningless when you have shown that you are not familiar with the characters given abilities,
Oh I'm quite familiar with them, the problem is you don't seem to be familiar with BOTH of the characters.

Originally posted by The MISTER
take pride in dismissing character bios completely and rest your case within the cliffhanging ever-changing unpredictable comic world.
And that's what I'm going to do. Sorry. Bios are rarely accurate to the comics for any character, unless you'd like to Tell Dark Crawler that Namor only flies at 40 mph. . .

Originally posted by The MISTER
How can you get technical when your evidence is not supported by well known character facts?
I pose that question to you.

Originally posted by The MISTER
Heres a technical term....Denial.
Yes, you are muchly in it. At least you've taken the first step and admited your problem. That's good.

Originally posted by The MISTER
It's backed up by character abilities but what do you say?
Already been covered. 🙂

Originally posted by Creshosk
Already been covered. 🙂
Won't repeat it huh? Good idea. 🙂 Fact of the matter is that without the bio you can just make up whatever you want to. Sorta like Wolverine writers...

If Wolverine is a humanoid then an unrated slap form Spider-man would burst blood from Wolverines nose mouth eyes and ears. Sorry... that's how it goes.

Originally posted by Creshosk
I'm saying that nitpicjking on a poorly depected occurence of events is assinine.
But resting your case on poorly depicted occurences of events is commendable? 😆

Originally posted by The MISTER
But resting your case on poorly depicted occurences of events is commendable? 😆
Ooo

Taking that out of context invalidates it and your argument. 😉

Better luck next time. 😄

Originally posted by The MISTER
Won't repeat it huh? Good idea. 🙂 Fact of the matter is that without the bio you can just make up whatever you want to. Sorta like Wolverine writers...

If Wolverine is a humanoid then an unrated slap form Spider-man would burst blood from Wolverines nose mouth eyes and ears. Sorry... that's how it goes.

Which still wouldn't be as bad as either classic collosus, or hulk. Yet there you are. 🙂

Originally posted by Creshosk
Which still wouldn't be as bad as either classic collosus, or hulk. Yet there you are. 🙂
You said it! 🙂 Truly we are are arguing about facts that I think are purposely made to contradict each other.

Thing is bios ARE supported about 80% of the time or more by the comics.

Here's the comic evidence... This guy...

Will murder this weak character...

..

Cause these scrubs...

Originally posted by The MISTER
You said it! 🙂 Truly we are are arguing about facts that I think are purposely made to contradict each other.

Thing is bios ARE supported about 80% of the time or more by the comics.

Here's the comic evidence... This guy...

80%?

In regards to his healing factor you put way too much stock in those bios. They're supported like 0% in wolverine's case without a plot device. WITH a plot device they are supported 80%

And you're STILL postiing that and commiting the slothful induction fallacy by ignoreing the fact that those were countered. 🙂

Originally posted by Creshosk
Ooo

Taking that out of context invalidates it and your argument. 😉

Better luck next time. 😄

This isn't taken out of context is it?

Originally posted by The MISTER
Why did this happen?

PIS.

That and the fact that Wolverine wasn't in "fight mode." He had his feet crossed on the seat in front of him with a cigar in his mouth. Hardly battle ready. Adrenaline, faster breathing.. none of those things which amp his healing factor were in play, none of them. On top of that, it wasn't one person shooting at him.