Originally posted by Melnorme😆
Alright. Whatver lets you sleep at night. With your Wolverine plushie.Sore loser.
Oh, yes such a wonderful response. Makeing assumptions about the oppositions personal life.
Guess you would have just been laughed off of any formal debate team yourself.
I'would have had to attempt to debate, in order to lose, and I would have to lose to be a sore loser.
You on the other hand have been thourghly beaten and I never even had to attempt to debate with you. So indeed you would be the "sore loser".
Better luck next time. And next time do research on the material before attempting to BS your way through.
Originally posted by Creshosk
I'would have had to attempt to debate, in order to lose, and I would have to lose to be a sore loser.You on the other hand have been thourghly beaten and I never even had to attempt to debate with you. So indeed you would be the "sore loser".
Sure buddy. That and the Democrats won in ought four.
Oh, and try reading my whole post instead of feverishly clicking the reply button, spitting out some typo-laden gainsaying, and thinking you've scored a coup.
I have won. 15% margin. Again, suck it, fanboy.
Originally posted by MelnormeNice non-sequiter. 🙄
Sure buddy. That and the Democrats won in ought four.
Originally posted by MelnormeI do read you entire posts, you editing it after I clicked the reply button doesn't mean I haven't.
Oh, and try reading my whole post instead of feverishly clicking the reply button, spitting out some typo-laden gainsaying, and thinking you've scored a coup.
Originally posted by MelnormeWishful thinking. . . but again, I would have had to try in order to lose, in order for you to win. However you have tried and failed to dissuade me from my position, so no, you have failed, quite miserably at that.
I have won.
Have I tried to persuade you to the other side? No. Do I think it's a worthwhile effort?
Well that last bit about fanboys certainly makes it seem like you have a mind like a steel trap, rusted and illegal.
Originally posted by MelnormeBetween your IQ and your shoe size?
15% margin.
Originally posted by MelnormeOH, third grade insults, how debate worthy of you.
Again, suck it, fanboy.
Yeah I'm the fanboy, when I haven't even stated my position on the matter to you and you're the one giving one of the character 10/10 based on an uninformed premise?
Yeah, if I'm a fanboy I'd hate to think of what you are.
God, debate jargon f***ing rules... This is first class entertainment. This has gone through every possible high class debate strategy within a page, from the old standby of "No, my dad (favorite character) could beat up your dad (favorite character)!" to the always popular "No I win!" to the incomparable "You're stupid!" I'm just waiting for someone to whip out the ultimate, uncounterable... "Your Mom!" Seriously. This is freaking hilarious, cuz Cresh had been the only one who really throws around the terminology, until now. He says "ad hominem" or "strawman" every other post. Seriously chaps, Melnorme, Creshosk, well done. This is up there with "Whirly vs. Never".
On a complete side note, God DAMMIT you sound like an ******* when you're good at arguing.
Now, on to points. Are physics applicable in a comics debate? Spiderman may very well be able to generate more force with his fingers than bullets can. Since Wolverine's skin is NOT bulletproof, Peter could conceivably pull an "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom" on him. I doubt even Logan can survive long if his intestines and heart are ripped out.
I still say the webs are dismissed way too casually. Wolverine has means to escape from them, but that does not make his escape instant. A stream of webs can build up on him much faster than he can cut himself free. Eventually, both arms are going to get pinned down, and then it's up to Peter as to how he should go about finishing Logan off. Just smashing Wolverine won't work, but Spiderman is quite the versatile little biatch.
Originally posted by DizzleThat was my intent. . . I kinda picked up that Melnorme would put up an interesting fight if I want through that route.
God, debate jargon f***ing rules... This is first class entertainment. This has gone through every possible high class debate strategy within a page, from the old standby of "No, my dad (favorite character) could beat up your dad (favorite character)!" to the always popular "No I win!" to the incomparable "You're stupid!" I'm just waiting for someone to whip out the ultimate, uncounterable... "Your Mom!" Seriously. This is freaking hilarious, cuz Cresh had been the only one who really throws around the terminology, until now. He says "ad hominem" or "strawman" every other post. Seriously chaps, Melnorme, Creshosk, well done. This is up there with "Whirly vs. Never".
Originally posted by DizzleI'm much more favrorable to these two methods succeeding than just pounding on the little runt.
On a complete side note, God DAMMIT you sound like an ******* when you're good at arguing.Now, on to points. Are physics applicable in a comics debate? Spiderman may very well be able to generate more force with his fingers than bullets can. Since Wolverine's skin is NOT bulletproof, Peter could conceivably pull an "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom" on him. I doubt even Logan can survive long if his intestines and heart are ripped out.
I still say the webs are dismissed way too casually. Wolverine has means to escape from them, but that does not make his escape instant. A stream of webs can build up on him much faster than he can cut himself free. Eventually, both arms are going to get pinned down, and then it's up to Peter as to how he should go about finishing Logan off. Just smashing Wolverine won't work, but Spiderman is quite the versatile little biatch.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Nice non-sequiter. 🙄
Wishful thinking. . . but again, I would have had to try in order to lose, in order for you to win. However you have tried and failed to dissuade me from my position, so no, you have failed, quite miserably at that.
Have I tried to persuade you to the other side? No. Do I think it's a worthwhile effort?Well that last bit about fanboys certainly makes it seem like you have a mind like a steel trap, rusted and illegal.
And if that's the extent of your powers to persuade, jibing me with a joke so lame my grandfather would apologize for uttering it, then clearly your skills are not up to the task. Worse still, you're about as funny as Robin Williams in his post-cocaine years, which is to say, not at all.
Between your IQ and your shoe size?
OH, third grade insults, how debate worthy of you.
Originally posted by Melnormeyes because the whole point of making a post in a battle thread highlighting the reasons why, and how much you think a character would win has nothing to do with trying to convince a person of your veiws, especially when they break out the debate terminology in the following posts. . . 🙄
If my intention was to dissuade you, then yes, you'd be correct. But up until the moment when you decided to make a personal attack against me, I had no idea who you were. So, yet again, you are mistaken.
Originally posted by MelnormeYeah like you're going to goad me nto arguing with you with that tired old reverse psychology bit. . . yawn
And if that's the extent of your powers to persuade, jibing me with a joke so lame my grandfather would apologize for uttering it, then clearly your skills are not up to the task.
Originally posted by MelnormeYes because obviously I was joking. 🙄
Worse still, you're about as funny as Robin Williams in his post-cocaine years, which is to say, not at all.
Originally posted by MelnormeYes as obviously I'm joking. . again. . .
No, between the people who would give this fight to Spiderman, and those who would give it to Wolverine. But, then again, you already knew that, but couldn't resist the urge to lay down another 50 year old punchline. Someone call George and Gracie...this kid's gonna be a star!
Originally posted by MelnormeAnd you still try to debate with your betters which is why you are still talking to me, thanks for the indirect compliment.
I've given up trying to debate my lessers.
Originally posted by MelnormeNo it isn't. Slothful induction is hardly a valid argument.
My points remain valid and unchallenged,
Originally posted by MelnormeIt's be questioning authority if you had any. As you have none I'm not questioning authority.
despite your palsied attempts to question authority.
Originally posted by MelnormeI'd sure hope so, coming in here and making assumptions of another person's veiw.
Any disinterested third party has the record of our exchange to judge this by. In this light, I'm comfortable with my performance.
"Suck it fanboy." was it?
Originally posted by MelnormeBout time, you've only been arguing with me for some time, not even knowing what my stance was. That's pretty damned sad.
So much so that I choose now to bow out, and leave you chasing your tail in an attempt to make up for lost ground.
Originally posted by MelnormeAgain, bout time. You should have quit when you were ahead, and to do that you would have needed to nt post anything.
Good luck on that; I'm done with you.
Originally posted by DizzleGood post. Wolvie's honestly not fast or strong enough to stop Spidey from doing stuff to him. Spidey can strip the flesh from his bones and demuscle him(I think I used this in the trio thread). Bones can't move by themselves unless were talking 'bout Juggernaut. They'd grow back but by then it'd be too late. Spidey's just a bit too much for Wolvie unless he's fighting "slow and stupid".
God, debate jargon f***ing rules... This is first class entertainment. This has gone through every possible high class debate strategy within a page, from the old standby of "No, my dad (favorite character) could beat up your dad (favorite character)!" to the always popular "No I win!" to the incomparable "You're stupid!" I'm just waiting for someone to whip out the ultimate, uncounterable... "Your Mom!" Seriously. This is freaking hilarious, cuz Cresh had been the only one who really throws around the terminology, until now. He says "ad hominem" or "strawman" every other post. Seriously chaps, Melnorme, Creshosk, well done. This is up there with "Whirly vs. Never".On a complete side note, God DAMMIT you sound like an ******* when you're good at arguing.
Now, on to points. Are physics applicable in a comics debate? Spiderman may very well be able to generate more force with his fingers than bullets can. Since Wolverine's skin is NOT bulletproof, Peter could conceivably pull an "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom" on him. I doubt even Logan can survive long if his intestines and heart are ripped out.
I still say the webs are dismissed way too casually. Wolverine has means to escape from them, but that does not make his escape instant. A stream of webs can build up on him much faster than he can cut himself free. Eventually, both arms are going to get pinned down, and then it's up to Peter as to how he should go about finishing Logan off. Just smashing Wolverine won't work, but Spiderman is quite the versatile little biatch.
Wolvie wouldn't have scored any of those graveyard attacks if Spidey didn't stupidly let him tackle him. Wolvie's not winning this unless Spidey flat out f**ks up. If they're both @ 100% and fighting with intelligence, Spidey's got this. Wolvie could do his best and still lose to a Spidey doing his best. Spidey fighting to his full potential beats the shit out of Wolvie doing the same.
Originally posted by brainchild81
Wolvie wouldn't have scored any of those graveyard attacks if Spidey didn't stupidly let him tackle him. Wolvie's not winning this unless Spidey flat out f**ks up. If they're both @ 100% and fighting with intelligence, Spidey's got this. Wolvie could do his best and still lose to a Spidey doing his best. Spidey fighting to his full potential beats the shit out of Wolvie doing the same.
Spiderman would never have gotten tired huh? 🙄
Originally posted by brainchild81
Wolvie wouldn't have scored any of those graveyard attacks if Spidey didn't stupidly let him tackle him. Wolvie's not winning this unless Spidey flat out f**ks up. If they're both @ 100% and fighting with intelligence, Spidey's got this. Wolvie could do his best and still lose to a Spidey doing his best. Spidey fighting to his full potential beats the shit out of Wolvie doing the same.
Fighting 100%? So when spidey says "I've given him everything I've got" it means he's not fightin 100%?
I think it's dumb that Wolverine's head has no damage to it and while Spiderman was cracking the tombstone. He should of been tearing his mask/skin off his face.
And how does Spiderman compare to the Spiderwoman on the new Avengers team? 'Cause I recall her stabbing Wolverine in the face with his own claws.