As I know how strongly Mr. Parker feels about this, I will agree that the film should have been called Man-spider. I believe the sequel should be called 'You paid to watch this? Did you not see the first?!' 🙄
Anyway I'll always remember the comics, old cartoons and stuff. They are betrayed but never forgotten so lets not start a war over one poor production. 🤨
OMG! WOULD YOU GUYS SHUT UP! If this isnt the largest raising stink thread on the whole god damn site! So spiderman could spray crap out of his arms and his ass, SO? Its more freckin realistic than him finding out how to make a material strong enough to latch onto a bridge and hold a trolly full of like 80 pound kids and like a few 200 pound adults while being beaten up, without it breaking! We barly even freckin been able to recreate the type of sticky pads gecko's have on their feet yet, , but they can be used for about 5 minutes, and only one time! And for someone to make webbing thats strong as like iron? Im sorry but, I think a man that can climb up walls and has a spider sense and is strong is not a super hero, without webbing. I mean, who really cares guys, You can pretend he was shooting out his fake webbing instead of crap. I mean... Jesus christ you people find the gayest things to yell about...
What is very annoying and absurd is the icoherant attempts of the man spider fans to say that a guy creating a fluid is unbelievle when all the things in the movie are unbelievle, all the things. Its a superhero movie based in a comic book, not a documental based in the Vietnam war. A guy with spider powers from the bite of a spider is more unbelievle, or a guy getting super strenght drinking a formula, etc, etc. For not mention that peter creating that high tech costume is as or more unbelievle that peter creating his fluid. That excuse is getting older and older, man spider fans.
Venomfan: Go go dude!! Tell it like it is
I hardly know a thing about spiderman but the thing is changing one little thing doesn't ruin the franchise. Look at how much was changed in the x men movies, the origins are nothing like the comic but it hasn't ruined the franchise. Its made it better and much more believable. I know that spiderman isn't all that believable but things like the glider we have seen in movies before and things like that have been made but have been declared to unsafe for public use. No one would believe though that a young college scientist would be able to come up with something as strong as that 'organic' webbing when other, more clever scientists cannot
It has nothing to do with what is more believable and what is less believable, it's how many of those things make it into the movie. At a point it becomes too much. He couldn't have made the costume, he shouldn't be able to climb walls or any of that stuff, but the webbing would have been one more line we had to cross. Granted, if they had done the web shooters rather than something else it would have worked, but too many things would become too much. They would have had to spend allot more time on the web shooters and their creation than they had time to give. I would prefer they didn't do the shooters than do them half assed.
Either way you feel about this, you are more than welcome to feel that way, just think about wht other people think before trashing what they say.
honestly I preffer the organic web shooters... what high school senior is going to know how to make a web shooter and how is Peter gonna be able to afford the maintenance on these web shooters on Uncle Ben's salary... errr.... pension..... errrrr insurance payoff. He was a poor kid who got super abilities. HE wasn't a rocket scientist who won the Nobel prize.
Well, well, well. If it isn't my old friends Mr. Parker and bakerboy. Your act hasn't changed much. I see since you've not gathered too many converts over at the Spiderman Hype, *sarcasm* oh apologies, MANSPIDER HYPE *sarcasm* forums, you've decided to spread your words of idiocy in other forums. Well, we won't let you troll without giving you a fight no matter where you go. 😈