Originally posted by Soujaboy
What haven't I given facts on? everything I've stated has had scans along with it, wether the facts are 10 pages back or not.(yes I already posted the 8th day scans)It seems to me that since you have no facts or scans or proof, that your just going to try to attack me. That's ok though, because I have my proof and scans, so get at me.
Here go's your proof
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e101/Soujaboy/Juggs20vs20Thor0.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e101/Soujaboy/Juggs20vs20Thor1.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e101/Soujaboy/Juggs20vs20Thor2.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e101/Soujaboy/Juggs20vs20Thor3.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e101/Soujaboy/Juggs20vs20Thor4.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e101/Soujaboy/Juggs20vs20Thor5.jpg
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e101/Soujaboy/Juggs20vs20Thor6.jpgIs that what you wanted?
Now show mw proof that Hulk's durability increases, he has unlimited stamina, he cant be ko'd when he's enraged, and that he cant be killed when he's enraged.
So was that 8th Day Juggy? And what exactly does that prove? And who knows a well written Hulk can't withstand that? Mindless Hulk already did in Hulk 300.
And I already showed you scans that said that he can go on for hours on end and still grow stronger. I also showed you a scan of Wolverine and Hulk. Wolverine actually says he gets tougher to hurt when he gets angry. And that was grey Hulk.
Show me some Non-PISified proof that he can be KO'd and Killed by someone like Juggernaut. If it doesn't explicitly say that Hulk's durability/invulerability has been overcome, there's simply no telling if it's PIS or not. Writers tend to forget the rules sometimes.
I don't have a scanner, so I'm gonna have to search the whole internet if I want to post proof. But I'll keep looking. But only for the stamina thing, because everybody knows the Hulks increasing physical powers during times of stress/anger also extend to his durability and invulnerability.
not saying I like it or I don’t, I’m just wondering what you would think of this:
It’s been said that the Hulk is the physical manifestation of strength.
Stan Lee has alluded that the Hulk was created with thoughts of him being the strongest character.
I think everyone knows my take on the whole matter.
Now please, before we begin, I’m not suggesting that the Hulk is the most powerful character (he can’t fly, uses no regular weapons, has no energy or magic-based powers, etc.) and I’m not suggesting that he can’t be defeated, but we all know that Hulk is the strongest one there is…it would be nice if he were portrayed that way more in the comics (and I’m talking about how Hulk was a big punching bag in some of his guest spots over the past couple years).
Here’s the question:
There are certain characters that are the living manifestations of certain intangibles.
For example, it’s been speculated that Mangog is not so much of a character as he is the physical embodiment of hate.
You have characters like Eternity and Infinity and Death that are basically avatars or are the representations of those concepts.
How would you feel if it was revealed (or perhaps just hinted) that the mysteries about where all Hulk’s extra mass comes from when he transforms and how he can have limitless strength, etc. is because he actually is the universe’s embodiment or manifestation of strength?
This could explain his ability to adapt and why he can’t die. He’s a constant; he has to live because he is an abstract for strength. The Maestro survived while all the heroes died.
This could explain how a typically weaker “Banner Hulk” circa Secret Wars was able to, in essence, “catch” the weight of a mountain range that, “dwarfed the Andes” and, in a split second, save all the other heroes.
This could also explain how the Hulk has been known to do things that are, technically, impossible (like grabbing energy with his hands, tying up Blastaar with an Adamantium I-beam, and possibly his greatest feat of strength, separating matter and anti-matter).
This would explain why a character that, with one punch, was able to do what the combined might of Earth’s mightiest couldn’t do (crack Onslaught’s armor), but yet the same character doesn’t kill Ben Grim when in a fight. (In other words, the Hulk’s “gift” only ramps up his strength just enough to complete the task. You don’t need to hire an Olympic power lifter to lift a bag of flour. The Hulk doesn’t need his “asteroid shattering strength” to fight Venom, you know?).
What do you guys think? Does this severely change the nature of the character or would this be a cool revelation?
Originally posted by hulk=strength
not saying I like it or I don’t, I’m just wondering what you would think of this:It’s been said that the Hulk is the physical manifestation of strength.
Stan Lee has alluded that the Hulk was created with thoughts of him being the strongest character.
I think everyone knows my take on the whole matter.Now please, before we begin, I’m not suggesting that the Hulk is the most powerful character (he can’t fly, uses no regular weapons, has no energy or magic-based powers, etc.) and I’m not suggesting that he can’t be defeated, but we all know that Hulk is the strongest one there is…it would be nice if he were portrayed that way more in the comics (and I’m talking about how Hulk was a big punching bag in some of his guest spots over the past couple years).
Here’s the question:
There are certain characters that are the living manifestations of certain intangibles.
For example, it’s been speculated that Mangog is not so much of a character as he is the physical embodiment of hate.
You have characters like Eternity and Infinity and Death that are basically avatars or are the representations of those concepts.How would you feel if it was revealed (or perhaps just hinted) that the mysteries about where all Hulk’s extra mass comes from when he transforms and how he can have limitless strength, etc. is because he actually is the universe’s embodiment or manifestation of strength?
This could explain his ability to adapt and why he can’t die. He’s a constant; he has to live because he is an abstract for strength. The Maestro survived while all the heroes died.
This could explain how a typically weaker “Banner Hulk” circa Secret Wars was able to, in essence, “catch” the weight of a mountain range that, “dwarfed the Andes” and, in a split second, save all the other heroes.
This could also explain how the Hulk has been known to do things that are, technically, impossible (like grabbing energy with his hands, tying up Blastaar with an Adamantium I-beam, and possibly his greatest feat of strength, separating matter and anti-matter).
This would explain why a character that, with one punch, was able to do what the combined might of Earth’s mightiest couldn’t do (crack Onslaught’s armor), but yet the same character doesn’t kill Ben Grim when in a fight. (In other words, the Hulk’s “gift” only ramps up his strength just enough to complete the task. You don’t need to hire an Olympic power lifter to lift a bag of flour. The Hulk doesn’t need his “asteroid shattering strength” to fight Venom, you know?).
What do you guys think? Does this severely change the nature of the character or would this be a cool revelation?
very good point, Me personally I accept this argument.
Originally posted by hulk=strength
not saying I like it or I don’t, I’m just wondering what you would think of this:It’s been said that the Hulk is the physical manifestation of strength.
Stan Lee has alluded that the Hulk was created with thoughts of him being the strongest character.
I think everyone knows my take on the whole matter.Now please, before we begin, I’m not suggesting that the Hulk is the most powerful character (he can’t fly, uses no regular weapons, has no energy or magic-based powers, etc.) and I’m not suggesting that he can’t be defeated, but we all know that Hulk is the strongest one there is…it would be nice if he were portrayed that way more in the comics (and I’m talking about how Hulk was a big punching bag in some of his guest spots over the past couple years).
Here’s the question:
There are certain characters that are the living manifestations of certain intangibles.
For example, it’s been speculated that Mangog is not so much of a character as he is the physical embodiment of hate.
You have characters like Eternity and Infinity and Death that are basically avatars or are the representations of those concepts.How would you feel if it was revealed (or perhaps just hinted) that the mysteries about where all Hulk’s extra mass comes from when he transforms and how he can have limitless strength, etc. is because he actually is the universe’s embodiment or manifestation of strength?
This could explain his ability to adapt and why he can’t die. He’s a constant; he has to live because he is an abstract for strength. The Maestro survived while all the heroes died.
This could explain how a typically weaker “Banner Hulk” circa Secret Wars was able to, in essence, “catch” the weight of a mountain range that, “dwarfed the Andes” and, in a split second, save all the other heroes.
This could also explain how the Hulk has been known to do things that are, technically, impossible (like grabbing energy with his hands, tying up Blastaar with an Adamantium I-beam, and possibly his greatest feat of strength, separating matter and anti-matter).
This would explain why a character that, with one punch, was able to do what the combined might of Earth’s mightiest couldn’t do (crack Onslaught’s armor), but yet the same character doesn’t kill Ben Grim when in a fight. (In other words, the Hulk’s “gift” only ramps up his strength just enough to complete the task. You don’t need to hire an Olympic power lifter to lift a bag of flour. The Hulk doesn’t need his “asteroid shattering strength” to fight Venom, you know?).
What do you guys think? Does this severely change the nature of the character or would this be a cool revelation?
Sounds acceptable for a theory.
Originally posted by hulk=strength
not saying I like it or I don’t, I’m just wondering what you would think of this:It’s been said that the Hulk is the physical manifestation of strength.
Stan Lee has alluded that the Hulk was created with thoughts of him being the strongest character.
I think everyone knows my take on the whole matter.Now please, before we begin, I’m not suggesting that the Hulk is the most powerful character (he can’t fly, uses no regular weapons, has no energy or magic-based powers, etc.) and I’m not suggesting that he can’t be defeated, but we all know that Hulk is the strongest one there is…it would be nice if he were portrayed that way more in the comics (and I’m talking about how Hulk was a big punching bag in some of his guest spots over the past couple years).
Here’s the question:
There are certain characters that are the living manifestations of certain intangibles.
For example, it’s been speculated that Mangog is not so much of a character as he is the physical embodiment of hate.
You have characters like Eternity and Infinity and Death that are basically avatars or are the representations of those concepts.How would you feel if it was revealed (or perhaps just hinted) that the mysteries about where all Hulk’s extra mass comes from when he transforms and how he can have limitless strength, etc. is because he actually is the universe’s embodiment or manifestation of strength?
This could explain his ability to adapt and why he can’t die. He’s a constant; he has to live because he is an abstract for strength. The Maestro survived while all the heroes died.
This could explain how a typically weaker “Banner Hulk” circa Secret Wars was able to, in essence, “catch” the weight of a mountain range that, “dwarfed the Andes” and, in a split second, save all the other heroes.
This could also explain how the Hulk has been known to do things that are, technically, impossible (like grabbing energy with his hands, tying up Blastaar with an Adamantium I-beam, and possibly his greatest feat of strength, separating matter and anti-matter).
This would explain why a character that, with one punch, was able to do what the combined might of Earth’s mightiest couldn’t do (crack Onslaught’s armor), but yet the same character doesn’t kill Ben Grim when in a fight. (In other words, the Hulk’s “gift” only ramps up his strength just enough to complete the task. You don’t need to hire an Olympic power lifter to lift a bag of flour. The Hulk doesn’t need his “asteroid shattering strength” to fight Venom, you know?).
What do you guys think? Does this severely change the nature of the character or would this be a cool revelation?
Originally posted by hulk=strength
how if u actually yhought about it itd make since, juggs doesnt have unlimited strength an if he did id accept it but like u say about hulk theres no proof
i dont have any proof of it but i would thik that he does seeing how he gets all his powers from the same place but i wont sit here and say it for sure since i dont have proof
