SarKastic_OJ
Senior Member
Linkalishish: we call some of them Juggernaut fanboys because they have nick's named Juggernaut74 or JuggFan, how obvious can it get?
I'm not a Hulk fan as you can dig in my post and see, I'm pretty much neutral about him and really don't care if he wins or loses..But I'm applying or at least trying "some" form of logic to this battle of behemoths..
Secondly, Juggernaut being "physically invulnerable" is a weak argument, it's too full of holes to go by, what are you guy's saying is that the Hulk can't damage or topple Juggernaut?? Bullcrap, like I said 1001 times "physical invulnerability" is "OVERIDDEN" all-the-time..Gladiator was said to be physically invulnerable yet the hulk's blows hurt him, so was Thor, and the Thing, it's a "comic book" things like physical invulnerability were created to be challenged and proved wrong thus making the defying character seem more powerful...
Besides both these guys knocked each other around plent-O-times and neither side stood up and "took" another's blow without being affected..Since both have superhuman "unmeasurable" strength their powers can't be used in determining someone's physical invulnerabilty limit...
Lastly, since both reacted negatively from traded blows we have to go to their "mutant powers" to decide who is more durable, Juggernaut is "extemely durable" BUT the longer this battle goes on the STRONGER the hulk will get and the more his blows will be "felt", and the hulk heals at a more rapid rate, now stop being biased for a split second and think about what I just stated...The hulk is more agile and even if he's losing or showing fatigue he can "hop off" and heal "hop back" and be in top form once again...Like I said there is no way finite strength can stand up to infinite strength alone, this is a battle strength for strength..