Who is that, G? Is that the Dutchess of Wales or whatever she's called? It doesn't look like Britney. Maybe it's her servant. She has a servant in addition to a nanny? That's sad. She should trade in Kevin for one of those robots that do everything for you.
Why would you post a picture of the Princess of Liverpool in this thread?
Britney Spears threatened to take legal action after pictures of her newborn son popped up on the internet, apparently stolen from a private photo shoot. At least two websites showed photos of Spears embracing her child, as well as a family portrait. A statement released last night by Spears' record label, Jive Records, said the photos were swiped from a private photo session. "Anyone who publishes, sells or otherwise exploits any of these images in any way will be subject to liability and damages for willful infringement of copyright, and will be liable for invasion of privacy," the statement read. The pop star gave birth to her first child last month. Spears and her husband, Kevin Federline, recently made their first public appearance since the infant was born, but there have been no clear images of the baby until now.
Thus it is that Sunset Protective Services, an outfit run by two retired police officers, advertises prominently for something it calls "paparazzi abatement". The company's website features a picture of the car wreck that claimed the life of Princess Diana in Paris in 1997, along with the caption: "Don't let this happen to you." The somewhat less than grammatical text continues: "We photograph, follow, document and generally make life miserable to be a paparazzi."
To prove its point, Sunset Protective Services offers a rogues' gallery of snappers sitting in their cars, pointing cameras and looking generally unhappy to have someone else's cameras turned on them. One picture on the website shows a photographer apparently being pulled over by the police. Another is captioned: "An independent shutterbug with scrapes and bruises." And indeed the photograph shows a young woman with unspecified injuries to her right forearm.
The implication is clear, and not necessarily all that pleasant - you mess with celebrities, and Sunset Protective Services will mess with you.
AMEN! Maybe now the losers will start respecting people's privacy.
Originally posted by Britroguemaybe, but it's a losing battle for the celebs tbh....
They were posted on a number of sites, but the Spears Camp claimed legal rights for invasion of privacy, and the sites were forced to remove the pictures and apologise.
Even Justin Timberlake has been jumping to her defence over this. The war between the Celebs and the Media is getting pretty hot!
Originally posted by botankusoh man that's classic....
I guess if Kevin won't step up to the plate, Justin's going to have to.