spiderman,er manspider movie,a piece of crap film

Man dont let these sony idiots fool you into believeing a spiderman movie has been made just because they put the name spiderman up on the screen and and have a guy wear a spiderman costume.They have successfully brainwashed thousands of americans who nothing about the true character into believeing that,dont let them brainwash you all to,just because it says spiderman on the screen doesnt mean a spiderman movie has been made yet.Thats like going along with them if they gave him 8 arms and they put the name spiderman up on the screen,just because THEY lie to you like they did to millions of americans,doesnt mean a spiderman movie has been made yet.the real character you REALLY saw was MANSPIDER,deal with it.dont let them lie and fool you just by the title,the REAL character under the costume is manspider so you are going to be seeing manspider 2 this summer. 🙄

Oh come on! Yeah we're all brainwashed! Whoohoo! Don't you think you've gone off the deep end? And you said" just because the spiderman on the screen" like 5 times.

WHAT THE HELL? You have made no decent points outside of the webshooters. You have never given any other reasons for why he is Man-Spider. Are you really proposing that because of those shooters he is Man-Spider? Is that all you have to go on? I repeat; the character of Spider-Man. What about Spider-Man did they slaughter so horribly? He was a dorky nerd, he was insecure, and before you start on the sarcasm and insulting read the first Spider-Man story, the first comic. He did start cocky. He had to become confident in his powers and then he started razzing guys.
Have you ever enjoyed a superhero movie? Have you ever enjoyed any movie? You need to be able to look past those few small imperfcetions and see the things they got right. I may have been brainwashed by Sony, but at least I didn't brainwash myself. All you do is try to justify to yourself why it was so horrible. You need

They could've made Goblin look just like the Goblin from the comics, he looked semi-good in all the 3d shots on the glider, but as soon as you saw him with that lame-ass metal you were like "UGH."

Look at Lord of the Rings. Gollum = Perfect example.

Originally posted by Bagtatta
They could've made Goblin look just like the Goblin from the comics, he looked semi-good in all the 3d shots on the glider, but as soon as you saw him with that lame-ass metal you were like "UGH."

Look at Lord of the Rings. Gollum = Perfect example.

I’m not really ‘feeling’ your comparison to Lord of the Rings, but I agree that the goblin was a little campy, although unlike Mr Parker I think the overall effect was good.

I used LOTR example as to say, you can make anything work now. Gollum was a full out, 100% 3D character..just manned and voiced by a real person.

Goblin could've been that, the movies were being made around the same time were they not? I think if they WANTED to make Goblin look like the Goblin from the comics they could've, and he would've looked decent as well. It's just lazy film-making to me.

For God's sake... we're back on this crap again???? Can't you rip on something else for a change... like maybe the new costume selection for the upcoming Catwoman film?

I'm not even admitting that that Catwoman movie exists. If they could have used the original story and character it could have been bitchin, but how they are doing it SUCKS ASS.
And back to the Goblin, I'll admit the suit was a little cheesy, but I think what they did with the mask was really pretty cool. A rubber mask like in the comic would have been cool, but unrealistic. The eye slots and the mouth made it look as close to a rubber mask as they could have. The rest of the body suit was corny, but you have to remember that the suit was supposed to be a armored battlesuit. But everyone can have an opinion. I think they could have done better, but I'm happy with how it came out.

Originally posted by Zephonim
I'm not even admitting that that Catwoman movie exists. If they could have used the original story and character it could have been bitchin, but how they are doing it SUCKS ASS.
And back to the Goblin, I'll admit the suit was a little cheesy, but I think what they did with the mask was really pretty cool. A rubber mask like in the comic would have been cool, but unrealistic. The eye slots and the mouth made it look as close to a rubber mask as they could have. The rest of the body suit was corny, but you have to remember that the suit was supposed to be a armored battlesuit. But everyone can have an opinion. I think they could have done better, but I'm happy with how it came out.

Preach on, brotha!!!!

Amen!

I try.

mr parker gots some good points i liked the movie but it didnt portray the comic very well the fact that he isnt as fun loving as a spiderman should be gets me mad he needs to joke around some more with the bad guys. defoe did a good job. harry was average. MJ was ok but they could have gotten a better girl. so all in all its
MAN-SPIDER

You are all idiots. True there are some things that they could have done better with the Spider-Man movie. But over all it was still an excellent film. And the fact of the matter is that it followed the comics a lot better then most super hero based movies do. You are NEVER going to find a movie that follows the comics exactly. I mean you don't see me whining in every X-Men thread that they didn't start it out with the original 5 X-Men do you?

thats different the xmen dont really a starting point unlike spiderman the spider bite so they should portray the comic

Thanks for saying that, now i dont have to say anything. I'm out of here.
P.S Mr. Parker Get a life anybody whose willing to spend hours writting about a movie thats two years old must have no friends at all or your just plian stupid.

Originally posted by MarkofKaine
You are all idiots. True there are some things that they could have done better with the Spider-Man movie. But over all it was still an excellent film. And the fact of the matter is that it followed the comics a lot better then most super hero based movies do. You are NEVER going to find a movie that follows the comics exactly. I mean you don't see me whining in every X-Men thread that they didn't start it out with the original 5 X-Men do you?

Careful who you call an idiot, MoK. Some of us actually are chastising Mr. Parker's contributions here, not supporting it.

Originally posted by MarkofKaine
You are all idiots. True there are some things that they could have done better with the Spider-Man movie. But over all it was still an excellent film. And the fact of the matter is that it followed the comics a lot better then most super hero based movies do. You are NEVER going to find a movie that follows the comics exactly. I mean you don't see me whining in every X-Men thread that they didn't start it out with the original 5 X-Men do you?

That still doesn't change the fact that they've changed a lot of the story and I could easily come on here and do nothing but complain about how it's not the X-Men without Beast or Archangel or how it's ridiculous to have Rogue dating Iceman...but do I? NO! Because I realize it's just a movie and there's no way they're going to get it perfect.

Wow...why did I quote myself? that was dumb...hehe

Hey Parker, nice to see you're alive and well. I was getting worried about you. Give 'em hell Parker, give 'em hell.

Originally posted by Gambit Lebeau
mr parker gots some good points i liked the movie but it didnt portray the comic very well the fact that he isnt as fun loving as a spiderman should be gets me mad he needs to joke around some more with the bad guys. defoe did a good job. harry was average. MJ was ok but they could have gotten a better girl. so all in all its
MAN-SPIDER

Great points Gambit and great to have someone else over here for a change besides bakerboy who gots logic and common sense and can distinguish spiderman from manspider.,thats why this film was just a piece of crap garbage film.Hell the 90's cartoon was a lot more loyal and true to the source material than this awful film was.Like you said this movie was a horrible adaptation of the comic because he didnt joke around like spidey always does with the bad guys,thats nuts spidey never shuts up when fighting some baddie.as I said before,MJ sucked,they did the same mistake in this film that they did in the 90's cartoon making her more like gwen stacy and nothing at all like MJ.yeah harry was average at best,he was the weakest link in the movie,and defoe did a great job,too bad nobody could take him seriously as the green goblin since his costume was so awful looking.Unlike the batman cartoon,there were a lot of mistakes made in the 90's spidey cartoon series that really made that show suck,but at least with the cartoon,I can tolerate it and sit through it even though they screwed up royally drawing peter parker so wrong because at least in that show,he is spiderman and not a damn manspider monster like he is in the movie.I'll take the badly written 90's cartoon over the movie anyday.As I said,unlike the batman cartoon which was a kick ass cartoon unlike the movies,even though I was really dissapointed with the 90's toon because of a lot of stupid mistakes they made like the way they drew peter parker-the 80's cartoon nailed his look,why couldnt the 90's? 😠 I can at least sit throug the cartoon because its a hell of a lot more loyal to the source material than that god awful manspider movie was.