jackson in trouble again

I bet alot of you watched Larry King Live, Court TV etc etc....
you all know what happened, what a joke Diane Was!
DIANE DIAMOND just REVEALED TOM SNEDDON WAS HER SOURCE!
shes so stupid!
Did you hear her? "I keep in touch with all my sources" and then later catching herself...."not that he tells me anything serious...."

this case is getting funnier and funnier. The prosecuter [Tom Sneddon] leaking to the reporters.... ?!!! what?!
Has there been anytime a prosecutor attack a defendant that personally unrelated to the case??
Larry asked the PERFECT question and she put her foot in her mouth. Just yesterday she DENIED to Oxman that Sneddon was leaking information to her. Now she just said he is a "source".
Diane Dimond got very nervous and almost couldn't talk when Larry asked her why Tom Sneddon gave her the interview......he said it wasn't very useless
. She was definitely caught off guard by that question and it was difficult for her to try to formulate a lie. But she couldn't come up with anything so she just said "because I asked". Larry raised a great question by asking her "Why would a DA do an interview like that in the first place?"
If you notice when Diane Diamon is on any television show, every anchor tells her specifically "No Speculation" why? Because they know what she is capable of and the trouble she can cause a network for leaking false information. It spells 100 million dollar lawsuit.

Tom Sneddon, the District Attorney of Santa Barbara, has been playing the race card with this accusation from the beginning in 1993. How?

By the mere fact he trusted that accusation of the boy and father in 1993 although that case was so BOGUS.

Let's break it down. You had Evan Chandler, the father of the boy making the first accusation as a Dentist who longed to be an ASPIRING SCRIPT WRITER. He had to his credits Robinhood Men in Tights.

So, Evan goes to a social worker so that the social worker (as required by law) must report the accusation to police by law. So, Evan Chandler NEVER took his son to police to give a statement. Instead, he decided to FILE A LAWSUIT, in the middle of the criminal investigation.

WHY A LAWSUIT AT THIS POINT IF HIS STORY IS SO CREDIBLE??? Because he knew the burder of proof is LOWER. HE NEVER WANTED TO PRESS CHARGES IN A CRIMINAL CASE BECAUSE HE KNEW HIS STORY WAS TOTALLY UNBELIEVABLE TO A JURY.

What parent would not cooperate with police at this point??? If it were your child, WOULD YOU TOTALLY IGNORE AUTHORITIES TO FILE A LAWSUIT???

Tom Sneddon wants the public to believe Evan Chandler didn't speak because Michael settled the lawsuit as, hush money. BUT, THE POLICE INVESTIGATION BEGAN IN AUGUST 1993 AND THE SETTLEMENT OF THE LAWSUIT WASN'T UNTIL JANUARY 1994.

If Tom Sneddon claims, the boy refused to testify because of the settlement, WHAT WAS STOPPING THEM FROM COOPERATING IN THE MONTHS PRECEDING THE SETTLEMENT? MONEY WASN'T STOPPING THEM AS THEY WERE IN FULL GEAR TRYING TO SHARE THEIR CIVIL SUIT INFORMATION WITH A TABLOID PROGRAM, HARD COPY, INSTEAD OF POLICE.

AND TOM SNEDDON DIDN'T EVEN RAISE ONE EYEBROW AT THE BEHAVIOR OF EVAN CHANDLER.

RACISM!!!!!!!!!!!

After the lawsuit was settled, Evan Chandler would participate in a book titled "Michael Jackson was My Lover," a reference to his OWN SON BEING THE "LOVER" OF MICHAEL JACKSON.

WHAT PARENT WOULD PARTICIPATE IN A BOOK CALLING THE MOLESTER OF THEIR SON A "LOVER?"

DID TOM SNEDDON GET SUSPICIOUS OF EVAN CHANDLER FROM THIS ACTION? NO.

WHY? RACISM.

DID MICHAEL MAKE ANY EFFORTS TO STOP THE PUBLICATION OF THIS BOOK? NO??? SO, HOW EXACTLY WAS THE MONEY, HUSH MONEY???

EVAN CHANDLER CAN TALK TO AN AUTHOR FOR A BOOK, BUT NOT TO POLICE???

DID TOM SNEDDON GET SUSPICIOUS OF EVAN CHANDLER? NO!

WHY?

RACISM.

EVAN CHANDLER AND HIS CONMAN, BROTHER, RAY, CONTINUED TO PLAY GAMES WITH MICHAEL. EVAN THREATENED, WHICH IS IN COURT DOCUMENTS HE SUBMITTED IN A SECOND LAWSUIT, TO PUBLISH AN ALBUM CALLED "EVANStory."

IT WAS GETTING MORE RIDICULOUS BY THE MINUTE. BUT DID TOM SNEDDON EVEN BEGIN TO QUESTION THE FATHER??? NO!

WHY? RACISM.

RACISM IS THE REASON TOM SNEDDON IMPLIES HE CHANGED THE LAWS, JUST FOR MICHAEL, TO FORCE A CHILD TO TESTIFY. BUT WHAT TOM SNEDDON SHOULD HAVE DONE IS PASS A LAW TO PREVENT FRADULENT ACCUSATIONS FROM PARENTS AND PROMISE PROSECUTION IF THEY TRY TO EXTORT MONEY IN A LAWSUIT BEFORE A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETE.

TOM SNEDDON CONTINUED TO BELIEVE THAT BOGUS CASE FROM 1993 WITH A FATHER MANIPULATING THE PUBLIC.

ONLY A WHITE DISTRICT ATTORNEY WOULD BELIEVE THIS STORY. THIS IS THE REASON MICHAEL WROTE THAT SONG DS, REFERENCING TOM SNEDDON AS A KKK.

MICHAEL KNOWS A HOODED KKK, WHEN HE SEES ONE.

Why cant you get this through your thick heads

I'm done with this thread.........some people will never believe their hero can commit wrong doings.........even when their heros have a past history of committing the same wrong doings.

I will close with this........and think about it very carefully.........

I bet when Michael Jackson gets to prison he will be very remorseful that he spent so much time and money to make himself look like a woman.

hehe i bet when he proves his innocence you guys wont have anything to say! your done because you aint got shit to tell me. and your come back was about his looks. WOW

From: [email protected]
To: -----------
Subject: Redemption: The Truth Behind the Michael Jackson Child Molestation Allegations
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:59:29 EST

I feel the need to let the cat out of the bag and let the Christian community know of an up coming book which I have authored that is in the process of being released by my publisher called "Redemption: The Truth Behind the Michael Jackson Child Molestation Case." [Already scheduled for a Dec 1st release.]

I was the sole legal secretary that worked for the attorney of the father of the little boy that accused Michael Jackson of child molestation before, during and after the 1993 allegation. I have known from the very beginning, and reveal in my book, that Michael Jackson was set up of the child molestation charges from the very beginning. I originally gave this information to Michael Jackson's investigators at the onset of the investigation, but because the case settled and never went to court, the information that I provided never came to the public's attention.

Redemption explains what was going on behind the scenes and in the court system that caused Michael Jackson to settle. Instead of closing the case, Tom Sneddon vowed to change the laws just for Michael Jackson. In his press conference yesterday, he specifically said that Michael Jackson is being charged under the newly form 288(a) of the child molestation law 288, which charges anyone "who willfully and lewdly commits any lewd or lascivious act with a minor," is guilty of child molesting. Sneddon qualified that it is different than 288, which deals with the actual sex act of child molesting.

I am asking the Body of Christ to be prayful for Michael Jackson in light of this ugly demon rearing its head once again. If there was a scred of credible evidence against Michael Jackson of child molestation in 1993, he would have been brought to justice regardless of the settlement. He had two county DA's offices investigating trying to build a case against him. I am contending that if he didn't do it then, he is not guilty this time. But the perpitrator is still the same, even though the accuser is different.

Please don't let the hype cloud your vision concerning the motive of the D.A.'s office in this case. If Tom Sneddon was really searching for the truth, how did I get overlooked by his investigation when I worked diectly in the office of the attorney of the 1993 accusers?

In my book I have a chapter titled, "A Ram In the Bush." It speaks to why I was there to witness the original set up of Michael Jackson. If you can understand Michael Jackson's spiritual mission, trying to bring world peace to this nation, it should be clear that Satan is the only one that has always tried to abort it, as he has done in times past. The chapter ends by saying "for all the love that Michael Jackson gave to millions of children...God gave Michael a ram in the bush!

Anyone that knows me, know that public attention horrifies me. I have been fighting the thought of coming forth with the truth, but I can say that God himself has been leading me and guiding me to come forward. If there was anybody else or any other way, I would opt out. But God reminded me that this is the true meaning of a missionary. One who is willing to put their life on hold for the sake of another. Christ was our greatest example when he laid down his glory and came to save mankind. And need I remind you, he came in the name of love, and they crucified him too falsely. (Let's not forget the whiles of Satan that are comon to all men).

This is not a plug for my book, but a plea for Christians to remain prayerful for Michael Jackson at this time. I contend that had Michael Jackson gone to trial the first time, he would have been exonerated. I stand firm in believing if he was set up the first time, which I witnessed, he is being railroad once again into the charge of child molestation by a D.A. that has been carrying a vendetta for 10 years.

God bless you all for listening to my heart's plea for prayers and God's justice in this case

www.branchandvinepublishers.com/

come on now california dont have an active kkk and i know that for a fact he may or may not have done it but im not buying the racism bit i mean if the case was in lie mississpi or some where like that maby but kkk in cali thats funny

o k guyz just tell me 1 thing. and please please please look at what i have said coz u never do that!

in the press conference the media asked sheriff how long they have known about this. they said 2 months. the lady then asked why did u wait for two months and the sheriff said because of halloween. now u tell me, if the sheriff think that there is a child molestor and he is loose and is free, would they let him b loose for even 1 day? wouldnt they just arrest him right away. why did they wait eh? if they think michael jackson is that dangerous

FOR HEAVENZ SAKE READ MY POST EVIL DEAD AND U ALL!

You cannot arrest a person because you "know about" a crime they have committed.............Kimmie, you might want to do a bit of research about the laws in the United States. I don't know how your country works but here in the U.S. you must have some sort of evidence before you can arrest somebody you suspect of a crime. Which is why no legal charges were pressed against Jackson 10 years ago. The DA's office did not have enough evidence to prosecute Jackson w/o the little boy's testimony............ofcourse the little boy wouldn't testify in a legal trial because Jackson paid his family millions of dollars (undisclosed settlement that has been estimated as anywhere between $14-$20 million) to not testify........but then again you already knew that didn't you. You already knew that Jackson paid a kid $15 + Million not to testify against him in a court of law. The true actions of an innocent person.

Back to the subject.........this isn't communist China. You cannot be arrested simply because you have been accused of a crime, there must be evidence. The very fact that Jackson was arrested bares testimony to the fact that they do have evidence that Jackson did infact molest this boy. It's pretty funny that the warrant for Jackson's arrest was issued right after they raided Neverland huh.......as if perhaps they found the evidence they needed at his home when they raided it.

And I'm still waiting on an answer to my question. You say that everybody in the world is being brainwashed into believing Jackson is a child molestor by some big conspiracy between the media, government, KKK and anybody else you can think of............because you KNOW he did not commit the crime. I'll pose the question again.

What do you know about Jackson that the rest of the world doesn't know about him that makes you so sure that he COULDN'T have committed this crime?

You are just a fan sticking up for your fallen idol. There are many reasons to suspect Jackson is guilty........and actually a bit of evidence (since he was arrested)..............after Jackson is found guilty you will still persist he is innocent......that he was the victim of some worldwide conspiracy between the media, the government, the KKK, the neo-nazis, the freemasons and the grey aliens from Zeta Reticuli. Even if Jackson is found guilty you will not be able to admit that he is. He could sign a full length confession tomorrow and plead guilty......and you still wouldn't believe it. Why? Because you are a fan boy (well girl in this case) who is so biased that you base your opinions of a legal case on the accused's capacity to entertain you and not on the facts of the circumstances surrounding the accusation. This makes your opinion null and void, worthless.

lol, "a big conspiracy between the government and the KKK". That would be hilarious.

They should just leave the dude alone man. I dont like him much, but its not like he's bombing iraq or anything.

No, he's touching little boys in the pants, which is worse then bombing iraq

I agree with what someone posted earlier. Who is sticking up for the children here?

Who is thinking about them?
What if he did do this?

Doesn't anyone here care about a kid or kids that will be scared for the rest of his life?

Originally posted by vvvrulz
They should just leave the dude alone man. I dont like him much, but its not like he's bombing iraq or anything.

well therez a difference between ACCUSED and guilty. i can even ACCUSE michael jackson of molesting me. the point is, the day when he is found guilty i will believe u all but till then i am gonna have a neutral way2 look at it.

o k guyz just tell me 1 thing. and please please please look at what i have said coz u never do that!

in the press conference the media asked sheriff how long they have known about this. they said 2 months. the lady then asked why did u wait for two months and the sheriff said because of halloween. now u tell me, if the sheriff think that there is a child molestor and he is loose and is free, would they let him b loose for even 1 day? wouldnt they just arrest him right away. why did they wait eh? if they think michael jackson is that dangerous

FOR HEAVENZ SAKE READ MY POST EVIL DEAD AND U ALL!

I posted this for you already in my last post......so I will simply cut/paste it here again.

"You cannot arrest a person because you "know about" a crime they have committed.............Kimmie, you might want to do a bit of research about the laws in the United States. I don't know how your country works but here in the U.S. you must have some sort of evidence before you can arrest somebody you suspect of a crime."

and

"The very fact that Jackson was arrested bares testimony to the fact that they do have evidence that Jackson did infact molest this boy. It's pretty funny that the warrant for Jackson's arrest was issued right after they raided Neverland huh.......as if perhaps they found the evidence they needed at his home when they raided it."

Now what makes you think they had any evidence before they raided Neverland last week? After all, you need evidence to arrest. What makes you believe they were in possesion of evidence for two months?

evil dead is right i live in modesto where the scott petterson trail is going on and he was a suspect like as soon as stacy went missing but they did not arrest him of the bat they had to get proof first to even try him now compard to what jackson is acoused of scott petterson is way worse he is being accuesed of murding his wife and unborn child but they did not pick him up right away cuese they had to build a case against him

Originally posted by alic88
well therez a difference between ACCUSED and guilty. i can even ACCUSE michael jackson of molesting me. the point is, the day when he is found guilty i will believe u all but till then i am gonna have a neutral way2 look at it.

Originally posted by BackFire
No, he's touching little boys in the pants, which is worse then bombing iraq

Just interested: how do you think touching little boys is worse than bombing Iraq? It's not like Michael is killing these kids the way our bombs are killing people in Iraq.

I'm JUST WONDERING what you're saying: but I DON'T agree with touching little kids the way he's accused of doing. (Not trying to attack you)

Michael may sleep with kids but I don't believe he touches them to get any sort of pleasure...

Originally posted by shadow_angel
Michael may sleep with kids but I don't believe he touches them to get any sort of pleasure...

And killing children in Iraq and/or anywhere else is just as bad!

I have a good friend that was molested as a child, when it was first coming out, everyday he wished he were dead and tried suicide twice just because of a man that "liked" to hang around with children.

hmm, ill still go with innocent until proven guilty, but if he's guilty... then to hell with him, literally.