A PETITION: Support Michael Jackson

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
He does have something to be afraid of, if people think he did it he could get in trouble even if he is innocent.

Yeah but that's coz people are bastards. He shouldn't have to fear them. He CERTAINLY shouldn't get into shit if he's innocent.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
What I mean is that both sides obviously are doing their fair share of bullshitting. He either did it or he didn't but neither side seems to have a particularly strong case. I have no clue if he did it or not, now that the kid's witness admits to lying it seems that he could very well be lying. But that doesn't mean I think Michael is innocent, it just means I have doubts as to whether he did it or not.

Well considering the people accusing him and almost zero evidence I'd say that they have a weaker case.

-AC

NEITHER SIDE HAS PARTICULARLY STRONG CASE?

based on the evidence so far.. the prosecution basically has a NO CASE. the kidnapping is already seeming false since they have told seperate stories about it, same goes for the alleged molestation. i say better look up on the internet to whats going on in the trial and then make a statement

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
If you think that a grown man sleeping with young kids is innocent affection that's your opinion.

It's not my opinion. Until he does anything illegal, then it's odd at worst. Not quite sure where the word guilt gets dropped in otherwise.

^very well said

i said it before and backfires said it again, after the past case, you'd think he'd have figured that if he slept in the same bed with children and put himself in the same position, history was bound to repeat itself. he put himself in a stupid postition

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
It's not my opinion. Until he does anything illegal, then it's odd at worst. Not quite sure where the word guilt gets dropped in otherwise.

yes we are not certain yet, the justice system will find that out for his, but he is innocent until proven guilty

Even if he's found innocent does that really mean he didn't do anything? You can't really rely on the legal system all the time. Plenty of innocent people get off and guilty people go to jail, so we will never really be certain no matter what. Only Michael and the kid know the truth.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
Even if he's found innocent does that really mean he didn't do anything? You can't really rely on the legal system all the time. Plenty of innocent people get off and guilty people go to jail, so we will never really be certain no matter what. Only Michael and the kid know the truth.

You can say that about any case though. Only a murderer knows if he did or didn't do it but until psychic detective becomes a reality, we have no choice but to let the justice system deal with it.

If there isn't enough evidence (in this case, hardly any) to convict him, then yes, he's innocent.

-AC

I know you can say that about any case, and this one isn't any different. I just said that because alic88 said we aren't certain yet. We're never going to be certain unless they develop concrete evidence that he didn't do it. Most likely we'll never know the truth. There are a lot of people who aren't going to agree with the verdict whether it's innocent or guilty. In the long run, everyone is just going to make their own conclusions, just like the OJ Simpson case.

Which will more often than not be based on their view of his life and lifestyle, not the case.

-AC

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
I know you can say that about any case, and this one isn't any different. I just said that because alic88 said we aren't certain yet. We're never going to be certain unless they develop concrete evidence that he didn't do it. Most likely we'll never know the truth. There are a lot of people who aren't going to agree with the verdict whether it's innocent or guilty. In the long run, everyone is just going to make their own conclusions, just like the OJ Simpson case.

with the way this case is going, its just the evidence that prosecution does not seem to have, because its hard to believe from their point of view it is so flawed already. If things go like this people wont be even left to think that anything happened, because the prosecution evidence like i said is extremely flawed already. we will see how it unfolds, but every1 is always entitled to their own opinion, but the bottom line will be the COURT'S RULING, which is as close as you can get to the truth

i would never support Michael Jackson.. gross

same ewwww!!!!

i would slap him or pull off his wig and have it burned if he ever tried to touch me.. but since he only likes boys and Im a chica... then I guess I have nothing to worry about

that is so true

^ dont care wheather u like him or not, or call him gross whatever
just dont call him a CHILD MOLESTER if he is not been proven guilty.

Originally posted by Afro Cheese
Yeah legally speaking that's true. But AC was saying "he hasn't done anything wrong" not "he hasn't done anything illegal." If he said illegal I wouldn't have said anything, even though you still can't be certain he didn't do anything illegal.

I agree, however what I am saying is I'd rather not point fingers on the basis of things that aren't in themselves 'wrong' or illegal. 'Wrong' is a subjective term.

SimplePlanChica, you're a moron.

Wrong IS a subjective term, hence why if he didn't touch the kids in any bad way, I don't believe he did anything wrong.

-AC

Sorry i'm not going to read all this but I will be happy when this pedofílico go to jail.

South Park parody was great, long live cartman