The Official Naruto series Thread

Started by Q991,600 pages

The zanpakuto souls aren't the power you wield, just the spiritual energy that leaks out of them.

Nope, the zanpakuto are actually, literally the swords. Biju are not the power and the power can even exist after the biju are gone/in someone other than the host (Gaara, the Gin/Kin twins, etc.). A host can also specifically separate the power and the biju (full chakra mode). Quite a bit different from a zanpaku-to, which is always wielded.

When you use the zanpakuto or biju, you both become one. The Hachibi and B are the perfect example of this unison and what Kishimoto is trying to convey to the reader with the whole respect and name thing.

Nope, they don't become one. They still act like two separate beings even when fighting together.

You can hear a biju's name whenever it wants to tell you. Kenapachi's zanpakuto's name is unknown and Kenpachi wasn't strong enough to hear it, nor did he subjugate his sword.

You can hear a biju's name if someone on the street says it. They have *no* known special properties.

Shukaku's name has nothing special. Not a single time has a name of a biju been learned in Naruto in the fashion of a zanpaku-to's name.


Knowing a zanpakuto's name doesn't give you a friend or someone willing to give it's life for you - the zanapakuto owner has to earn it through mediation, fighting, and a show of respect. For instance, you can know a zanpakuto's name but unless it is the name you earned from it, the name does nothing for you: just like Naruto learning Son Goku's name.

Actually, no, learning the name specifically gives you shikai. When you have the name, you get a more powerful mode.

Calling your Zanpkauto the wrong name doesn't prevent you from using it's power either- Kenpachi used his sword quite easily with no actual relationship between the two. The same is true of Ichigo.

Yumichka when he called his zanpaku-to's name wrong gets one shikai, and when he gets it right gets a far stronger one.

Ichigo's sword leveled up massively once he got it's name. Kenpachi's sword works but it is clearly indicated that due to not knowing the name, his spirit pressure and it's clash, as Zangetsu pointed out to Ichigo, and Kenpachi at the end of that fight said he wants to know it's name so he can get stronger.


Naruto has gained power from knowing his biju's name.

He's yet to get any power from knowing it, and he was already getting aid from Kurama from improved relations without knowing it.

Because Q99 has missed the entire point dadudemon is making, she thinks that his point is about just knowing the name and getting power. Since dadudemon made the point multiple times, at this point, that the "knowing the name" thing has much more to do with mutual respect and honor than it does invoking a name for power, she will finally understand why making such points are futile to the discussion.

But the point is, with a zanpaku-to, it's not just about mutual respect and honor, but it actively decides whether or not the user can use shikai. Even if a zanpaku-to tries to tell it's name to a user it respects, they still won't hear it if they aren't strong enough (Zangetsu tried telling Ichigo and *failed* at one point). Etc.. Zanpaku-to have special name rules.

Also, to state the obvious, "Names equal respect and honor" is not something from Bleach and predates it massively, so it's not ripping off Bleach to do that version.


So yeah, it's not a poor attempt at borrowing. When you flip it around... you find that there are dozen's of reasons and parallels between the two stories.

Not really. They differ in a half dozen specifics that are very important in Bleach but don't matter in Naruto, and they're only similar in extremely generic 'names are important for respect' stuff that doesn't come from Bleach.

Note: I knew that Q99 would have something to say about it because she cannot stand anyone criticizing obvious poor writing in Naruto.

I don't defend when people point out the actual errors.

But when people rag on errors that aren't actually there? Yea, I point it out.

The name thing between the two simply doesn't line up at all. There's nothing any more special about Biju's name than there is about, say, the Bleach captains, or Yamato/Tenzo's, as far as we know.

You're just trying to force an error. And if you have to force it, it's not a real error.

Originally posted by Q99
Nope, the zanpakuto are actually, literally the swords. Biju are not the power and the power can even exist after the biju are gone/in someone other than the host (Gaara, the Gin/Kin twins, etc.). A host can also specifically separate the power and the biju (full chakra mode). Quite a bit different from a zanpaku-to, which is always wielded.

Suck on your own words:

"Nope, the biju are actually, literally the weapons. Zanpakuto are the power and the power can even exist after the zanpakuto's are sheathed in. (Aizen and his sword: they only have to see it once, the scarring on Grimmjow from Ichigo's getsuga tencsho, etc.). A shinigami can also specifically separate the power and the sword (Sajin and his bankai, Kuchiki and his bankai). The biji are very similar to a zanpaku-to because both are always used as weapons."

Originally posted by Q99
Nope, they don't become one. They still act like two separate beings even when fighting together.

"Yup, they don't become one. They act the same being in full biju mode when fighting together. Contrast with Renji and Ichigo's bankai actually changing their appearance."

Originally posted by Q99
You can hear a biju's name if someone on the street says it. They have *no* known special properties.

"You can hear a zanpakuto's name if someone on the street says it. They have *no* known special properties."

Originally posted by Q99
Shukaku's name has nothing special. Not a single time has a name of a biju been learned in Naruto in the fashion of a zanpaku-to's name.

Well, then you didn't read the last chapter. Until you read the last chapter, you should not be discussing this topic. Until you know the following:

knowing a biju's name and calling them by that name in a respectful manner gains you the biju's respect. If it is your own biju, it will grant you the ability to sync with it as you both must overcome the trial of "getting to know each other" which is exactly like the trial to get to know your zanpakuto"

Then you can't ever be taken seriously. You will always be wrong as you have been wrong. You continually miss that point and blindly overlook that that is my main point.

Originally posted by Q99
Actually, no, learning the name specifically gives you shikai. When you have the name, you get a more powerful mode.

Actually, no, learning then name does not give you shikai. Examples include Ichigo and Kenpachi. There are exceptions in Naruto, as well: knowing Shukaku's name does not give you additional synchronization with that biju, either. And, what do I mean by "knowing" the name?

This, "knowing a biju's name and calling them by that name in a respectful manner gains you the biju's respect. If it is your own biju, it will grant you the ability to sync with it as you both must overcome the trial of "getting to know each other" which is exactly like the trial to get to know your zanpakuto"

So if you want to make my point less than it is, keep pretending that I have meant this and only this the entire time: "ONLY KNOWING THE NAME GIVES YOU POWAH, GODAMNIT! RAAAGE!"

Originally posted by Q99
Yumichka when he called his zanpaku-to's name wrong gets one shikai, and when he gets it right gets a far stronger one.

Ichigo's sword leveled up massively once he got it's name. Kenpachi's sword works but it is clearly indicated that due to not knowing the name, his spirit pressure and it's clash, as Zangetsu pointed out to Ichigo, and Kenpachi at the end of that fight said he wants to know it's name so he can get stronger.

"knowing a biju's name and calling them by that name in a respectful manner gains you the biju's respect. If it is your own biju, it will grant you the ability to sync with it as you both must overcome the trial of "getting to know each other" which is exactly like the trial to get to know your zanpakuto"

Also, if you think knowing the name of your zanpkuto, alone, is what is granting them that power, you missed out on understanding what actually happens. I know you don't think that and you're pretending to have missed a major plot point in Bleach just to be right (even though my entire argument never hinged on such an idiotic point, anyway).

Originally posted by Q99
He's yet to get any power from knowing it, and he was already getting aid from Kurama from improved relations without knowing it.

Thanks a bunch for finally getting my point. I suppose you are now conceding the point?

This has been my point the entire time. This is part of a trial and process to become one with the "weapon". Knowing the name and KNOWING the name are two different things.

Originally posted by Q99
But the point is, with a zanpaku-to, it's not just about mutual respect and honor, but it actively decides whether or not the user can use shikai.

Incorrect. It is a mutual relationship of respect and honor. Please go back and reread all the chapters concerning Ichigo beating Zangetsu to achieve bankai. Please go back and read the inner dialogue he had with it against his fight with Kenpachi. Please go back and read the portions and fight he had with his bankai Zangetsu.

Then when you see the "innermind" is exactly like the "innermind" setup in Naruto...you'll see yet another parallel I've pointed out.

Originally posted by Q99
Even if a zanpaku-to tries to tell it's name to a user it respects, they still won't hear it if they aren't strong enough (Zangetsu tried telling Ichigo and *failed* at one point). Etc.. Zanpaku-to have special name rules.

And on the same note: Naruto knowing Kurama's name and actually KNOWING Kurama's name are two different things. The name is the icing on the cake and will show us the progress of respect and honor between the two: just like a zanpakuto.

Originally posted by Q99
Also, to state the obvious, "Names equal respect and honor" is not something from Bleach and predates it massively, so it's not ripping off Bleach to do that version.

Also, to state the obvious, I said the following before you attempted to plagiarize me:

"It does, actually. You'd have to have an understanding of Japanese honorifics to understand that. I don't know how much you know about the Japanese culture and language, though. Were you aware of the depth and/or the social implications of getting to call someone by their name? It's a huge deal, actually. If you ever do business there, don't ever call the people you do business with by their first name....trust me."

And here is the point that you continue to miss (on purpose to troll like you always do because you hate it when someone criticizes Naruto):

"Knowing their (biju) names will make them stronger because it signifies a relationship of trust between the two."

"This is part of a trial and process to become one with the "weapon"."

"knowing a biju's name and calling them by that name in a respectful manner gains you the biju's respect. If it is your own biju, it will grant you the ability to sync with it as you both must overcome the trial of "getting to know each other" which is exactly like the trial to get to know your zanpakuto"

I will now start requoting myself to you because you have entered the phase where you have nothing legitimate or meaningful to add to the conversation. Just whining and trolling because someone dared say something negative about Naruto.

Originally posted by Q99
Not really. They differ in a half dozen specifics that are very important in Bleach but don't matter in Naruto, and they're only similar in extremely generic 'names are important for respect' stuff that doesn't come from Bleach.

They differ in almost all meaningless ways. And since my entire point is about he respect and honor granted concerning the names...I find your "casting my entire point aside" quite hilarious. You conceded and didn't even realize it.

Originally posted by Q99
I don't defend when people point out the actual errors.

Suuuuure.

Originally posted by Q99
But when people rag on errors that aren't actually there? Yea, I point it out.

That's not been my observation.

Originally posted by Q99
The name thing between the two simply doesn't line up at all. There's nothing any more special about Biju's name than there is about, say, the Bleach captains, or Yamato/Tenzo's, as far as we know.

It lines up perfectly the way I have stated it from the beginning. You are trying your hardest but failing to show anything to the contrary. Almost every last point you've made has actually been a reason to support my position. I made that a fact by just changing around the words in what you're saying. Don't you see how much in denial you've been about this? I'm not even having to try that hard to reply to you because of how ready my arguments are in your words. I don't remember a time when a "debate" was so easy to do. I just have to change the names and a phrase here or there to make my point.

Originally posted by Q99
You're just trying to force an error. And if you have to force it, it's not a real error.

This is not an error and this further proves how you're approaching this subject. You're the one forcing all the supposed contradictions. The only real difference is one has more direct influence on the power granted from "names" and the other has a more symbolic influence on the power granted from "names". Both are symbolic, both grant power.

Shit like this makes me want to snort a barrel of cocaine.

Wtf let it go.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Shit like this makes me want to snort a barrel of cocaine.

Wtf let it go.

K.

But after I stop holding my peen, then what?

I'm sure that could be put to better use.

Q99 seems pretty stressed out.

😐

Now off to write my Qdudemon crack fic...

Originally posted by NemeBro
I'm sure that could be put to better use.

Q99 seems pretty stressed out.

😐

Wait...you're saying that...

You naughty naughty devil. I'm quite sure she wouldn't let my peen anywhere near her, ATM. 😐

Originally posted by NemeBro
Now off to write my Qdudemon crack fic...

You don't even know what she looks like. 😐

But...make her look like Tali. 🙂

You don't even know if Q99 is a female, stfu. estahuh

And your request has been taken into consideration. 131

I wonder if this will offend Q99. mmm

Originally posted by NemeBro
You don't even know if Q99 is a female, stfu. estahuh

I do, she is.

Originally posted by NemeBro
And your request has been taken into consideration. 131

I wonder if this will offend Q99. mmm

Prolly. We are being reported and our bans will be served, shortly, for sexual harassment.

Hax.

And oh well.

Gonna start last thing first:


They differ in almost all meaningless ways. And since my entire point is about he respect and honor granted concerning the names...I find your "casting my entire point aside" quite hilarious. You conceded and didn't even realize it.

Here's the thing:

What you're arguing and what you're saying are apparently two different things.

Your meaning is, apparently, about respect and honor. Fine! We're agreed! Always have, no argument. If you just said this, there'd be no argument.

What you're arguing is that Naruto ripped off Bleach and that the name thing works the same between the two of them.

And noooooo, they really don't. They're pretty distinct in how they handle the names with Bleach giving them far more direct influence, and furthermore, the whole "importance of names thing," is an ancient concept that Bleach didn't make up.

It's really a lousy argument for ripping off. It's more like they're two different handlings of a very traditional concept.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Suck on your own words:

"Nope, the biju are actually, literally the weapons. Zanpakuto are the power and the power can even exist after the zanpakuto's are sheathed in. (Aizen and his sword: they only have to see it once, the scarring on Grimmjow from Ichigo's getsuga tencsho, etc.). A shinigami can also specifically separate the power and the sword (Sajin and his bankai, Kuchiki and his bankai). The biji are very similar to a zanpaku-to because both are always used as weapons."

Except no, the biju are independent beings and the chakra can be used without them.

Having the effects remain isn't the same as having the power remain. Aizen cannot hypnotize without the sword. Ichigo cannot do getsuga tensho without his. Etc.. You can't use any of a zanpaku-to's powers without the sword. If they were done in the past, sure, you can take advantage of them, but you can't do new ones.

Ginkaku can transform without Kyuubi, Gaara can use sand without Shukaku, and all the jinchuuriki can use most of their signature powers without their biju, they just lose the tailed modes. You can use the powers to do new attacks at will.

You keep doing a strait word-swap, and it keeps not fitting.

"You can hear a zanpakuto's name if someone on the street says it. They have *no* known special properties."

Except we do know the special properties. Saying the name is required to activate shikai in all but one case (and that case where it was forced does have disadvantages as a result). And until you dominate the blade, you need to say the name every time you activate it.

Knowing the bijus name isn't known to be required for powers.


Well, then you didn't read the last chapter. Until you read the last chapter, you should not be discussing this topic. Until you know the following:

knowing a biju's name and calling them by that name in a respectful manner gains you the biju's respect.

Sure, in the same way that calling a Captain their name respectfully gets respect.

Not in the sense of "you need it to activate certain powers."

Even total 100% biju control doesn't need the name, it can be done simply with the eyes. And it's not even needed to gain respect.

It is one possible way to gain respect. But so is "I'll do something about your hatred," or "I like you," or what have you.


If it is your own biju, it will grant you the ability to sync with it as you both must overcome the trial of "getting to know each other" which is exactly like the trial to get to know your zanpakuto"

Not really, you don't need to get to know the biju if you have certain powers, and you can gain even high-level abilities like total chakra mode without being friendly with your biju or having those special powers.

In Bleach, you need to get to know your zanpaku-to to activate shikai, which is in turn a prerequisite of bankai.

In Naruto, if you're strong enough and you can beat your own hatred, you can kick your biju to the curb and make fun of them constantly, never refer to their name, and have the next-to-highest level of biju control possible. If you have sharingan or wood, then you can get to the highest without.

You continually miss that point and blindly overlook that that is my main point.

I can't help but notice that none of the ways you keep word-swapping technically fit.

I'm not overlooking your main point, I'm pointing out your examples are simply wrong.

You keep saying they're exactly the same but they're not.


Actually, no, learning then name does not give you shikai. Examples include Ichigo and Kenpachi.

Ichigo learned Zangetsu's name when he got shikai, and it was how he got shikai.

Kenpachi is the only exception, his spiritual power forcing shikai. Even so, Zangetsu noticed that his blade and his own power clashed, unlike Zangetsu and Ichigo, as a result of this lack.


There are exceptions in Naruto: knowing Shukaku's name does not give you additional synchronization with that biju, either.

It's not an exception if it's every single case. The name has yet to give anyone any synchronization with a biju to our knowledge.

Knowing the name is merely a tool of politeness, it doesn't automatically unlock any power like with learning your zanpaku-to's name.


This, "knowing a biju's name and calling them by that name in a respectful manner gains you the biju's respect. If it is your own biju, it will grant you the ability to sync with it as you both must overcome the trial of "getting to know each other" which is exactly like the trial to get to know your zanpakuto"

Except we don't know of a single person where the name was a key component in gaining control of their biju. Not even Killerbee.


So if you want to make my point less than it is, keep pretending that I have meant this and only this the entire time: "ONLY KNOWING THE NAME GIVES YOU POWAH, GODAMNIT! RAAAGE!"

But here's the thing-

With Bleach, it does work that way.

"Knowing the name gives you powah," is explicitly how it works.

You starting this argument saying it's copying off Bleach... but if they work in two different ways, then that's not copying, is it?

It's not that I'm saying that's what you're saying. I'm saying, this is how it explicitly works in Bleach, and your argument is based on how it works in Bleach, so if it's not "Knowing the name gives you powah," in Naruto, then it's not based on Bleach.


Also, if you think knowing the name of your zanpkuto, alone, is what is granting them that power, you missed out on understanding what actually happens. I know you don't think that and you're pretending to have missed a major plot point in Bleach just to be right (even though my entire argument never hinged on such an idiotic point, anyway).

I'm pretty sure you missed a plot point.

You can't know a Zanpaku-to's name before you get shikai. You can't. The zanpaku-to can speak it and you won't hear it.

The moment you get that far in the relationship, the moment you learn the name is when you gain shikai. It is the key to the door that is shikai, in short.

Then, from that point forward until you learn bankai, the only way to activate shikai is to say it's name properly. If you fudge the name, it half-wakes up.


Thanks a bunch for finally getting my point. I suppose you are now conceding the point?

This has been my point the entire time. This is part of a trial and process to become one with the "weapon".

Here's the thing: We are agreed on how it works in Naruto. That's why you're saying I'm 'conceding' here, but that's always what I've been saying too, it's not conceding, it's just agreeing where we've always agreed.

That's not how it works in Bleach.

Please go back and read the inner dialogue

I recommend you do too, and pay more attention to the names and the shikai section- Like how Zangetsu tried to tell Ichigo his name and fails.

Yes, respect and honor is involved. However the names pay a very specific role, they are distinct signs of the level which has been reached, which they are not in Naruto.


Then when you see the "innermind" is exactly like the "innermind" setup in Naruto...you'll see yet another parallel I've pointed out.

I'll point out that Naruto visited his inner mind, with the cage and stuff, waaaay long ago, and Naruto started first, so it didn't come from Bleach.


And on the same note: Naruto knowing Kurama's name and actually KNOWING Kurama's name are two different things. The name is the icing on the cake and will show us the progress of respect and honor between the two: just like a zanpakuto.

But, in Bleach, there is no such distinction. You can't 'know' your own zanpaku-to's name without KNOWING it.


This is not an error and this further proves how you're approaching this subject. You're the one forcing all the supposed contradictions. The only real difference is one has more direct influence on the power granted from "names" and the other has a more symbolic influence on the power granted from "names". Both are symbolic, both grant power.

That's a huge difference. One has a direct influence, a major one, the other doesn't.

"Respect" is just one of several ways of biju control in Naruto and not even one that many people use, 3 of the 4 acknowledged total masters of Biju didn't use it.

I'm disappointed that the sexual harrasment comment was ignored in that response.

"Gonna start last thing first:"

O rly? Bentley wants you to comment on the creepy discussion Neme and I were having.

Originally posted by Q99
AndHere's the thing:

What you're arguing and what you're saying are apparently two different things.

Your meaning is, apparently, about respect and honor. Fine! We're agreed! Always have, no argument. If you just said this, there'd be no argument.

What you're arguing is that Naruto ripped off Bleach and that the name thing works the same between the two of them.

Oh really? So I see that you've conceded the point. However, there's the tiny problem of me having made this my point from the very beginning when I first made this point:

"Knowing their names will make them stronger because it signifies a relationship of trust between the two."

And I've clarified that there is a difference between knowing and KNOWING.

Originally posted by Q99
And noooooo, they really don't. They're pretty distinct in how they handle the names with Bleach giving them far more direct influence, and furthermore, the whole "importance of names thing," is an ancient concept that Bleach didn't make up.

Why are you bringing up that point, again? I already destroyed it.

The importance of names for their respective weapons is very similar: MORE POWAH! I've already explain the "hows" and showed why they are both symbolic...so none of that ragey stuff where you pretend my point is only about knowing the name.

Originally posted by Q99
It's really a lousy argument for ripping off. It's more like they're two different handlings of a very traditional concept.

It's not an argument at all: it's a fact.

It's more like they are two very similar things.

Obviously, both have their ties back into the feudal era of Japan were names were given and remembered as a form of respect and honor to each other...even as enemies. But the similarities end there...Kishimoto went a bit too far with this last chapter on the name thing. Now it is no longer ONLY symbolic. It has become a plot device.

Naruto will unlock his shikai form with Kurama because he now knows Kurama's name. Deal with it.

Originally posted by Q99
Having the effects remain isn't the same as having the power remain. Aizen cannot hypnotize without the sword. Ichigo cannot do getsuga tensho without his. Etc.. You can't use any of a zanpaku-to's powers without the sword. If they were done in the past, sure, you can take advantage of them, but you can't do new ones.

That does not matter to my point: having the effects remain counts: it's no different than Ginkaku going into a cloaked mode even after being separated from the Kyubi is a perfect example (edit...and one that you use later on. WTF? Are you trying to prove my right? lolololol).

And check this out: you can't go full beast mode without a beast. lol

So, basically, you're admitting I'm right. I appreciate that but why do you have to make these things so painful?

Originally posted by Q99
Ginkaku can transform without Kyuubi,

So using stolen chakra in anyway supports either your point or detriments mine? Hint: it doesn't. In fact, this particular example goes to further prove my point: stolen biju chakra in no way is comparable to the real thing. Even with full "zombie" control, it's not the same as a true friendship like B's. Read on for more reasons why.

Originally posted by Q99
Gaara can use sand without Shukaku,

That seems like more of a KG than an ability from Shukaku. His father could control gold like Gaara could sand.

Originally posted by Q99
and all the jinchuuriki can use most of their signature powers without their biju, they just lose the tailed modes. You can use the powers to do new attacks at will.

Now you are getting closer to my actual point. B is better than all the other Jinchuriki for one obvious reason (except maybe Yagura...because we don't know if he just got ultimate control or friendly understanding).

Originally posted by Q99
You keep doing a strait word-swap, and it keeps not fitting.

Only because you're blinded with your rage, not because it doesn't keep fitting. What I said fit very well. You actually went on to prove my point, partially, with the "beastless" biju chakra users.

Originally posted by Q99
Except we do know the special properties. Saying the name is required to activate shikai in all but one case (and that case where it was forced does have disadvantages as a result). And until you dominate the blade, you need to say the name every time you activate it.

Knowing the bijus name isn't known to be required for powers.

Ichigo's is a constant release shikai and he unlocks more and more power from it as he fights. Hardly that case you're making. Guess how he did that? Gaining the respect and honor of his zapakuto and becoming "one" with it. Now rage at me...

Originally posted by Q99
Sure, in the same way that calling a Captain their name respectfully gets respect.

Not in the sense of "you need it to activate certain powers."

No, that's not it. You missed my point. Just read on.

Originally posted by Q99
Even total 100% biju control doesn't need the name, it can be done simply with the eyes. And it's not even needed to gain respect.

I would argue that B's control is still better than Madara's and Hashirama's...even though their control is still technically "full control". Yagura had full control, too.

Originally posted by Q99
It is one possible way to gain respect. But so is "I'll do something about your hatred," or "I like you," or what have you.

You missed my point if you think that's all there is to it.

"Knowing their names will make them stronger because it signifies a relationship of trust between the two."

Or this:

"The only real difference is one has more direct influence on the power granted from "names" and the other has a more symbolic influence on the power granted from "names". Both are symbolic, both grant power."

Originally posted by Q99
Not really, you don't need to get to know the biju if you have certain powers, and you can gain even high-level abilities like total chakra mode without being friendly with your biju or having those special powers.

Well, you'll have to prove that. Because full-on beast mode seems to have been obtained by a select few and it is not the full-control that B has. B is the only one, that I am aware of, that has gained willing assistance from his tailed beast.

Also, we know exactly who could control what:

http://www.mangareader.net/93-18116-3/naruto/chapter-458.html

That's Madara, Hashirama, Yagura, and B. Out of those, only B has the willing participation. This allows for him to be stronger and faster than others, imo, because that beast acts as a teammate for B at all times. For instance, Hashirama or Yagura would not be able to knock themselves out of Tsukyomi with the beasts because the beast is not a willing participant (I don't think...it's possible that Yagura obtained a friendship with his beast like B...we don't know at this point).

The point is this:

"Knowing their names will make them stronger because it signifies a relationship of trust between the two."

and this:

Naruto will unlock his shikai form with Kurama because he now knows Kurama's name. Deal with it.

Originally posted by Q99
In Naruto, if you're strong enough and you can beat your own hatred, you can kick your biju to the curb and make fun of them constantly, never refer to their name, and have the next-to-highest level of biju control possible. If you have sharingan or wood, then you can get to the highest without.

lol..."if you have...wood". lololol

Sorry...back on track...

I would argue that B's control is still better than Madara's and Hashirama's...even though their control is still technically "full control". Yagura had full control, too.

Originally posted by Q99
I can't help but notice that none of the ways you keep word-swapping technically fit.

That's only because of your rage blinding your usual objective demeanor, not because I'm actually wrong.

Originally posted by Q99
I'm not overlooking your main point, I'm pointing out your examples are simply wrong.

You are and you are failing.

Originally posted by Q99
You keep saying they're exactly the same but they're not.

Not really. I'm saying more or less this:

"Knowing their names will make them stronger because it signifies a relationship of trust between the two."

Or this:

"The only real difference is one has more direct influence on the power granted from "names" and the other has a more symbolic influence on the power granted from "names". Both are symbolic, both grant power."

Originally posted by Q99
Ichigo learned Zangetsu's name when he got shikai, and it was how he got shikai.

Kenpachi is the only exception, his spiritual power forcing shikai. Even so, Zangetsu noticed that his blade and his own power clashed, unlike Zangetsu and Ichigo, as a result of this lack.

Both are using their released Shikai forms and cannot go to any sort of "reverted" form. Did you miss that?

Keep in mind that Ichigo had to earn the trust and respect from Zangetsu before he could "know" Zangetsu's name. The first time they meet, he couldn't hear Zangetsu say his name. He had to become "one" with his sword. Ichigo is stuck with a permanently released sword because he cannot seal it into a "normal" form.

Originally posted by Q99
It's not an exception if it's every single case. The name has yet to give anyone any synchronization with a biju to our knowledge.

Knowing the name is merely a tool of politeness, it doesn't automatically unlock any power like with learning your zanpaku-to's name.

Even if that's the only example of unlocking more power from your biju, it's still the same parallel that I've already drawn for us. Deal with it. Knowing the name and then using the name to show you have respect for your biju is not just a tool of politeness. It shows how far the relationship has progressed, the jinchuriki respects the biju as an equal, and the jinchurki no longer thinks of the biju as just a tool to be used as a WMD. Or have you been missing that this was my point the entire time? You know..the point I have made multiple times, now.

Naruto will unlock his shikai form with Kurama because he now knows Kurama's name. Deal with it.

Originally posted by Q99
Except we don't know of a single person where the name was a key component in gaining control of their biju. Not even Killerbee.

Yeah we do: Naruto and Kurama.

Naruto will unlock his shikai form with Kurama because he now knows Kurama's name. Deal with it.

Even if that's the only example, it's still the same parallel that I've already drawn for us. Deal with it.

Just wait...Kurama will be taken aback at Naruto calling him by his name or some shit. Sappy time...get ready for it.

Originally posted by Q99
But here's the thing-

With Bleach, it does work that way.

"Knowing the name gives you powah," is explicitly how it works.

You starting this argument saying it's copying off Bleach... but if they work in two different ways, then that's not copying, is it?

It doesn't give you power: Ichigo cannot activate the Hachibi by knowing it's name. He can for the 9-tails. 🙂 That's exactly how it is going to happen either next chapter or the chapter after that.

Naruto will unlock his shikai form with Kurama because he now knows Kurama's name. Deal with it.

You keep saying, "but it's not teh same! RAAAWR!" I'll keep saying, "Holy shit! It's teh samezees!!!"

Originally posted by Q99
It's not that I'm saying that's what you're saying. I'm saying, this is how it explicitly works in Bleach, and your argument is based on how it works in Bleach, so if it's not "Knowing the name gives you powah," in Naruto, then it's not based on Bleach.

K. Whatever. This:

Naruto will unlock his shikai form with Kurama because he now knows Kurama's name. Deal with it.

Originally posted by Q99
I'm pretty sure you missed a plot point.

You can't know a Zanpaku-to's name before you get shikai. You can't. The zanpaku-to can speak it and you won't hear it.

The moment you get that far in the relationship, the moment you learn the name is when you gain shikai. It is the key to the door that is shikai, in short.

Then, from that point forward until you learn bankai, the only way to activate shikai is to say it's name properly. If you fudge the name, it half-wakes up.

And I'm pretty sure you're wrong because we have two examples: Ichigo and Kenpachi. Both are using their released Shikai forms and cannot go to any sort of "reverted" form.

Keep in mind that Ichigo had to earn the trust and respect from Zangetsu before he could "know" Zangetsu's name. The first time they meet, he couldn't hear Zangetsu say his name.

This is getting off topic, however. Stay focused on the fact that Naruto now has to invoke Kurama's name to earn that trust and respect to unlock his full powahs. Holy shit...the parallel is too great. I don't understand why you're being so thick about this.

Naruto will unlock his shikai form with Kurama because he now knows Kurama's name. Deal with it.

Originally posted by Q99
Here's the thing: We are agreed on how it works in Naruto. That's why you're saying I'm 'conceding' here, but that's always what I've been saying too, it's not conceding, it's just agreeing where we've always agreed.

That's not how it works in Bleach.

"This has been my point the entire time. This is part of a trial and process to become one with the "weapon"."

That's how it works in Bleach.

Originally posted by Q99
Yes, respect and honor is involved. However the names pay a very specific role, they are distinct signs of the level which has been reached, which they are not in Naruto.

"Both are symbolic, both grant power."

Originally posted by Q99
I'll point out that Naruto visited his inner mind, with the cage and stuff, waaaay long ago, and Naruto started first, so it didn't come from Bleach.

I'll point out that I never claimed which started first: I only pointed out out just more parallels.

IIRC, they occurred around the same time with maybe less than a year of difference.

If you'll notice the wording in the portion you quoted, I said Bleach is like Naruto, not Naruto is like Bleach. That's because the Naruto release came first, in that particular regard. Why would I point it out? Because I'm just showing you how many similarities there are between the two: it doesn't matter who did what first.

Originally posted by Q99
But, in Bleach, there is no such distinction. You can't 'know' your own zanpaku-to's name without KNOWING it.

There is. Knowing your zanpakuto's name and actually coming to a mutual understanding and respect for each other are the ways to actually know their name. Nice try, but you still fail to grasp some of the basic concepts of Bleach (you didn't...you are being obstinate because admitting that just knowing the name doesn't give you power would prove my point).

Originally posted by Q99
That's a huge difference. One has a direct influence, a major one, the other doesn't.

Wrong. This:

"The only real difference is one has more direct influence on the power granted from "names" and the other has a more symbolic influence on the power granted from "names". Both are symbolic, both grant power."

Originally posted by Q99
"Respect" is just one of several ways of biju control in Naruto and not even one that many people use, 3 of the 4 acknowledged total masters of Biju didn't use it.

Prove which were "total masters" and then prove that they did so without becoming friends with their biju.

The only examples of the "how" are with B, only. They are friends. Pwned.

Here's where Ichigo embarks on his 3rd journey of more "biju" control:

http://www.mangareader.net/94-564-7/bleach/chapter-110.html

😬

Man...it's just ridiculous at this point.

Man, more stuff.

http://www.mangareader.net/94-564-19/bleach/chapter-110.html

Ichigo has to "overcome his evil side" to win more power from Zangetsu. WTF? That's just what Naruto did for winning power over the Kyuubi.

And this goes more to prove my ultimate point:

http://www.mangareader.net/94-565-8/bleach/chapter-111.html

http://www.mangareader.net/94-565-9/bleach/chapter-111.html

"Do you think that a complete stranger will suddenly become your best friend after you ask him his name?"

It's not about the name itself, it is about what the name means to both parties. It's the journey, the path, of winning honor and respect.

Meaning, it's not about knowing Zangetsu's name. It's about knowing Zangetsu. Simply reword that sentence with "Kurama" instead.

Why?

http://www.mangareader.net/94-565-10/bleach/chapter-111.html

"That's true. I never tied to open up or get to know the old man."

Bam. That primary reason for my case. Using Zangetsu just as a weapon did not earn Ichigo Zangetsu's honor and respect. He could not use his full power. Reword that sentence for Naruto and Kurama.

How do I know?

Bam:
http://www.mangareader.net/94-565-11/bleach/chapter-111.html

"A soul cutter isn't just a tool. Each has it's own name."

Compare and contrast this with:

http://www.mangareader.net/naruto/568/6

http://www.mangareader.net/naruto/568/7

http://www.mangareader.net/naruto/568/11

http://www.mangareader.net/naruto/568/12

http://www.mangareader.net/naruto/568/13

The whole dialogue there was to show that it's not necessarily the name itself, it's everything BUT the name. Same with Ichigo. Why do you guys think I used "symbolize" from the very beginning?

Bam:

http://www.mangareader.net/94-567-10/bleach/chapter-113.html

Naruto's goal with the Kyubi.

As seen here:
http://www.mangareader.net/94-567-11/bleach/chapter-113.html

In my comparison Kenpachi represents the old school thinking concerning Bijus (Madara, Hashirama, Mito, Kushina). Naruto and B represent the new school thinking about Biju.

And here's Ichigo releasing the 9-tails power:

http://www.mangareader.net/94-567-12/bleach/chapter-113.html

Now why do I say that? lol...

http://www.mangareader.net/93-33-7/naruto/chapter-28.html

Teh images look teh same! Kubo totes copied, mang!

Whoa, new Rock Lee's spring time of youth. They're really coming out fast.

And it even pokes fun at Kakashi saying he's been surpassed just for finishing the Rasenshuriken!

Morning Gorilla!

I declare this move canon!

Long story short on the argument:

Dadudemon kept trying to apply the exact descriptions of one to the other, and they simply didn't fit in the purely technical, literal sense.

Also, don't buy in to dadudemon's "Oooh Q99's angry so I'll act put upon and sad that I annoyed her," narrative 🙂


By the way, I will no argue this point any further. It is far too obvious that I am right and it is not necessary to argue my point for me to be magically more correct than I already am. I knew someone like you (I suspected it would be Q99, first, though) would ignorantly argue against the Zanpakuto comparison which I why I chose my words like a mother ****in' lawyer [csm]313[/csm.

-Dadudemon to Aura, before I even showed up in the discussion.

If you skim the argument, it looks like there's been fighting, but it's all on his side so he can go 'oh, I think so-and-so-is mad' and act sad to back out at the end, he was the only one mad to begin with 🙂

It's just a discussion trick to cover up his losing it ^^ He'd say whoever's arguing against him is mad. Aura, me, you name it, but we've just been saying 'nope, wrong' and he's just using the 'mad' thing as cover.

Something of a clever underhanded trick, really, but he's still wrong and it's still just an underhanded trick 🙂

you're a girl?!

da phuck?!

i fully understand the love for mito and" teh haus wyf" 😖hifty:

I can't decide if your trolling was appropriately timed or not. mmm

On the one hand, it will get us off this stupid topic. I keep biting my tongue because I don't want to get involved so getting off of it would help.

On the other hand, it's still trolling. And the Mito thing is hardly a better alternative. Well, maybe a little better I guess.