World of Warcraft

Started by Morridini151 pages

There is no way to make those statements, it all come downs to the players and the available items.

Take in the beginning of TBC, the first people who got to lvl 70 had to wait or the rest of their guilds before they could raid and got great gear, and many of them neglected getting gear while grinding.

I remember during my leveling in...... I've forgotten the name, first zone in Outland.....I met and killed 2 lvl 69 Huntards at lvl 60 as well as a Warrior at 70 who was a bit harder.

Originally posted by EvilAngel
Lol, he should have been able to **** your pet then kill you. What a nub of a warrior.

49>59 isn't really since most peep hve got the first very things from outland

How exactly would he be able to kill me? I was a hunter, getting the first shot. He was an around level 20 warrior. No intercept, no speed enhancing items and a two handed sword.

Gear does not weight near as much as skills does. If the ?? is a talented player and has the right skills, they will win. The reason I won against the warrior was because he could not do anything.

gear can easily beat skills sometimes unless the unkilled person is completly hopeless, altho its rare that someone completly hopeless is unskilled. a well equiped character can have higher resists, higher armor and hit so much higher than you, that even if your skilled it would be near impossible to win

for example i used to duel high level hunters at level 50, when they were 60, i think i was 52 actually and it was a accomplishment for me because the guy was supposedly very skilled and had tonnes of epic gear (me wearing blues) and that Loklor staff and the matching bow to go with it, and this dragon helm, those were fairly good items at the time, and i beat him so many times, ofc ime a lock so it took a couple of skills since he resisted, but thats skills>gear

but nowdays beating high levels is so much harder imo, the gear has grown so much, theres things at higher levels, diffrent enchantments and things that can make a higher level character so much harder to beat

Originally posted by Morridini
There is no way to make those statements, it all come downs to the players and the available items.

Take in the beginning of TBC, the first people who got to lvl 70 had to wait or the rest of their guilds before they could raid and got great gear, and many of them neglected getting gear while grinding.

I remember during my leveling in...... I've forgotten the name, first zone in Outland.....I met and killed 2 lvl 69 Huntards at lvl 60 as well as a Warrior at 70 who was a bit harder.

Ok, well their just noobs then, If i ever loose to someone lower level than me, it's because i've been power grinding and their a twink. I've NEVER yet lost to someone more than a level lower

Originally posted by Lady Fox
How exactly would he be able to kill me? I was a hunter, getting the first shot. He was an around level 20 warrior. No intercept, no speed enhancing items and a two handed sword.

Gear does not weight near as much as skills does. If the ?? is a talented player and has the right skills, they will win. The reason I won against the warrior was because he could not do anything.

Your pet is effectively a level 12 mob, which is basically a bag of rage for him, and you can't concussive shot him all the time, once he gets close, hamstrong, your screwed. Game over. Like i said Nubcake of a warrior, L2P.

Not neccessarily, as a caster then will resist an annoying amount of times, so it's not so simple 😬

Originally posted by EvilAngel
and you can't concussive shot him all the time, once he gets close, hamstrong, your screwed

Yeah. That's if he gets close. And that's a very big if at that.

Once you get the first shot off, warriors are actually the easiest class to kite in the early going for a hunter. Rogues have sprint, pally can BoP and stun. If the warrior loses the charge in the early going, the odds are distinctly stacked against them. Skill level is moot. A good hunter can easily just strafe and concussive and shoot continuously until the warrior is dead.

Originally posted by DarkC
Yeah. That's if he gets close. And that's a very big if at that.

Once you get the first shot off, warriors are actually the easiest class to kite in the early going for a hunter. Rogues have sprint, pally can BoP and stun. If the warrior loses the charge in the early going, the odds are distinctly stacked against them. Skill level is moot. A good hunter can easily just strafe and concussive and shoot continuously until the warrior is dead.

Level 20 warrior vs a level 10 hunter he can get close, apparently though this was some kind of super noob.

Originally posted by EvilAngel
Level 20 warrior vs a level 10 hunter he can get close, apparently though this was some kind of super noob.

Like I said, doesn't matter if they're nub or not. If the warrior loses the opening charge and doesn't have any speed enhancement or in this case Intercept at that level, he's pretty much screwed if the hunter knows how to kite. Hamstring's a five yard range, how's he going to do that if the hunter keeps concussive up and strafes continuously?

I doubt you can kite with concussive shot alone, the level difference means he could kill the pet without even trying so there's 35% of the hunters dps gone. No way does a 4 second slowing move with a 12 second cooldown make for probable kiting. At that level you don't even have wing clip

Later levels ofc Hunters can destroy warriors in the humiliating fashion, but at level 10 you have no where near enough tricks to do so.

The warrior is question had nubulitus, no doubt a severe case at that

Originally posted by EvilAngel
I doubt you can kite with concussive shot alone, the level difference means he could kill the pet without even trying so there's 35% of the hunters dps gone. No way does a 4 second slowing move with a 12 second cooldown make for probable kiting. At that level you don't even have wing clip

Later levels ofc Hunters can destroy warriors in the humiliating fashion, but at level 10 you have no where near enough tricks to do so.

The warrior is question had nubulitus, no doubt a severe case at that


Doubt or not, that's how it's done. Concussive shot is the biggest advantage that the hunter has over melee classes. A 4 second slow is more than enough to keep a warrior kited, even without improved concussive. All they really have to do is concussive, four seconds of progressive running/shooting, and when concussive is up all they have to do is 180 instant shots while running away to keep the warrior in combat until their cooldown is up again, rinse and repeat. There is no way a warrior can keep up with that, without some way to break the slow. They'll just chase the hunter around forever.

Also in the later levels, you're also wrong; the classes are much more balanced then. Warriors are more difficult to kite due to intercept, possibly improved hamstring or peircing howl. Not to mention trinkets. Hunters don't "destroy" warriors anymore, it's a good fight as any. Without intercept the odds are distinctly stacked against a good kiting hunter.

lol, hunters.

Originally posted by DarkC
Doubt or not, that's how it's done. Concussive shot is the biggest advantage that the hunter has over melee classes. A 4 second slow is more than enough to keep a warrior kited, even without improved concussive. All they really have to do is concussive, four seconds of progressive running/shooting, and when concussive is up all they have to do is 180 instant shots while running away to keep the warrior in combat until their cooldown is up again, rinse and repeat. There is no way a warrior can keep up with that, without some way to break the slow. They'll just chase the hunter around forever.

lol, so you're saying a level 20 warrior isn't a noob if he loses to level 10 hunter? XD L2P

Originally posted by EvilAngel
lol, so you're saying a level 20 warrior isn't a noob if he loses to level 10 hunter? XD L2P

No, I'm saying that if it's a level 20 warrior vs a level 10 hunter; if the hunter knows how to kite and kite well, the warrior's skill level is moot; simply because with the gear described, he cannot do anything about it.

L2Read.

Not really, it's coming across here like you think it wouldn't be uncommon for that to happen. The warrior was a noob with few equals, period IMO

The warrior should have had a ranged weapon and simply out damaged the hunter from a distance.

Originally posted by BackFire
The warrior should have had a ranged weapon and simply out damaged the hunter from a distance.

Yup, but I think it was mentioned earlier that the warrior had standard gear, two handing a sword, nothing mentioned about ranged gear.

Besides, even if his ranged skill were up, he's not going to shoot nearly as fast as the hunter. It'd be a close DPS race if both were wearing standard greens. Warrior's best bet is always close range.

Originally posted by EvilAngel
Not really, it's coming across here like you think it wouldn't be uncommon for that to happen. The warrior was a noob with few equals, period IMO

It's coming across as was described earlier, Evil, I'm just expanding the situation that was provided. Level 20 warrior vs level 10 hunter. Warrior has typical green gear and a 2H sword, hunter has greens. That's the situation I'm assessing here. Point still stands, regardless of your opinion. If it's a skilled hunter the warrior is facing, he's screwed pretty much. If. Why do you think I included that word in there? It's just a situational analysis is all.

A ranged weapon is standard gear at 20 for any decent warrior, if for no other reason than to simply range pull without getting up close and aggroing a group..

And no, it would not be close at all. A standard level 20 warrior would have mostly greens (maybe a blue or two), decent armor, and a ranged weapon that does much more damage than one a hunter can get a level 10, along with at least twice as much hp. A warrior would absolutely be able to stand there and trade ranged blows and come out on top with ease.

Originally posted by BackFire
A ranged weapon is standard gear at 20 for any decent warrior, if for no other reason than to simply range pull without getting up close and aggroing a group..

And no, it would not be close at all. A standard level 20 warrior would have mostly greens (maybe a blue or two), decent armor, and a ranged weapon that does much more damage than one a hunter can get a level 10, along with at least twice as much hp. A warrior would absolutely be able to stand there and trade ranged blows and come out on top with ease.


Haven't ever tested the waters with that kind of a ranged situation before, so I wouldn't really know.

Originally posted by EvilAngel
Ok, well their just noobs then, If i ever loose to someone lower level than me, it's because i've been power grinding and their a twink. I've NEVER yet lost to someone more than a level lower

Your pet is effectively a level 12 mob, which is basically a bag of rage for him, and you can't concussive shot him all the time, once he gets close, hamstrong, your screwed. Game over. Like i said Nubcake of a warrior, L2P.

Not neccessarily, as a caster then will resist an annoying amount of times, so it's not so simple 😬

Originally posted by EvilAngel
I doubt you can kite with concussive shot alone, the level difference means he could kill the pet without even trying so there's 35% of the hunters dps gone. No way does a 4 second slowing move with a 12 second cooldown make for probable kiting. At that level you don't even have wing clip

Later levels ofc Hunters can destroy warriors in the humiliating fashion, but at level 10 you have no where near enough tricks to do so.

The warrior is question had nubulitus, no doubt a severe case at that

Are you serious, or do you just like giving me a laugh? 😛

Originally posted by BackFire
A ranged weapon is standard gear at 20 for any decent warrior, if for no other reason than to simply range pull without getting up close and aggroing a group..

And no, it would not be close at all. A standard level 20 warrior would have mostly greens (maybe a blue or two), decent armor, and a ranged weapon that does much more damage than one a hunter can get a level 10, along with at least twice as much hp. A warrior would absolutely be able to stand there and trade ranged blows and come out on top with ease.

A warrior, unlike a hunter does not have instant shots. They also have shorter fire range. He also needs to stand completely still. With a concussive shot a hunter can easily run away from the warrior and bandage up. If the hunter is skilled, the warrior stands no chance until he gets intercept.

Of course, you will probably run out of land if you try kite a 29 warrior at level 10 and then die if the warrior knows what he is doing. It will also take forever to kite such level range 😛

Besides, I had a boar. That warrior never stood a chance.

Originally posted by Lady Fox
Are you serious, or do you just like giving me a laugh? 😛

I'm serious, are you though? the more i think bout this the more i can't help but think it's just a fib.

Originally posted by Lady Fox
Besides, I had a boar. That warrior never stood a chance.

LMFAO

Originally posted by Lady Fox
How exactly would he be able to kill me? I was a hunter, getting the first shot. He was an around level 20 warrior. No intercept, no speed enhancing items and a two handed sword.

Gear does not weight near as much as skills does. If the ?? is a talented player and has the right skills, they will win. The reason I won against the warrior was because he could not do anything.

says the girl that doesnt even play 😛