evolution

The genetic code of a fish is simialr to a rabbit how please prove this.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
The genetic code of a fish is simialr to a rabbit how please prove this.

The System, I meant...

Every living thing has dna how does this prove evolution.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Every living thing has dna how does this prove evolution.

Oh it doesn't prove it, it just shows that a fish could become a Rabbit (very basic terms....)

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Because mutation is a break or replacement of information, If I bombed a building the structure would change but it wouldn't have new features now answer my question and I'll shut up.

Holy crap, you're such an ass.

Are you even the slightest bit familiar with DNA and RNA? What it does and what a mutation to even the smallest bit of DNA can do?

If you don't, shut the **** up and go read about it.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yes it is...what the hell.

[edit]My bad, same Coding System.

But it's still different info .

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
But it's still different info .

But Info that, through changes can become equal to that of the other being.

Originally posted by Arachnoidfreak
Holy crap, you're such an ass.

Are you even the slightest bit familiar with DNA and RNA? What it does and what a mutation to even the smallest bit of DNA can do?

If you don't, shut the **** up and go read about it.

I know it can't turn a fish into a land animal moron unless it already has the traits, that's obvious.

Originally posted by Bardock42
But Info that, through changes can become equal to that of the other being.

No it can't we don't have the same info so how can we be similar heck we don't even have the same ancestors.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Oh it doesn't prove it, it just shows that a fish could become a Rabbit (very basic terms....)

How why would a fish when do fish have terrestrial excretory info in there DNA.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
No it can't we don't have the same info so how can we be similar heck we don't even have the same ancestors.

Yes we do...we all have the same ancestors.

and see:

Fish: 1234234121
Rabbit: 2431113242

Same Info just coded differently.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yes we do...we all have the same ancestors.

and see:

Fish: 1234234121
Rabbit: 2431113242

Same Info just coded differently.

Tell that to creatures of the cambrian age that suddenly appeared with no common ancestors and no we are not genetically similar to a fish.

And we do not have exact charateristics simaler to fish nor will we ever.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Tell that to creatures of the cambrian age that suddenly appeared with no common ancestors and no we are not genetically similar to a fish.

And we do not have exact charateristics simaler to fish nor will we ever.

Well, I am not aware of that incident, but I suppose a link is missing as for now.

And yeah we are...

Oh, you mean "And nor will we ever have again" that makes more sense...although, we are quite similar in early embrional stages...

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, I am not aware of that incident, but I suppose a link is missing as for now.

And yeah we are...

Yeah a link, somewhere... 🙄

EDIT: So we are genetically similar to fish some where in our dna there is a trait for gills?

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Yeah a link, somewhere... 🙄

EDIT: So we are genetically similar to fish some where in our dna there is a trait for gills?

Well, where there is a mystery there is an answer, but I won't throw a perfectly good theory that might need some slight adjustment away because there is one thing that doesn't quite fit in...

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Yeah a link, somewhere... 🙄

EDIT: So we are genetically similar to fish some where in our dna there is a trait for gills?

Oh yeah..the possibility, certainly.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, where there is a mystery there is an answer, but I won't throw a perfectly good theory that might need some slight adjustment away because there is one thing that doesn't quite fit in...

One thing, throw in no common ancestors or transitional forms in there and the second rule of thermodynamics continue to have in that theory just like creationist.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Oh yeah..the possibility, certainly.

We would need an increase in the number of traits.

I'm outta here you guy's are hypocrites,critsizing creationist when your own theory needs faith I'll debate your faith another time peace.

Originally posted by Blue nocturne
Every living thing has dna how does this prove evolution.

Every living thing has DNA....but no two DNA codes are exactly the same.

I think you're underestimating the complexity of DNA coding. It took YEARS for the human genome to be mapped. It's massive. ONE change in the coding of one tiny section of a chromosome is enough to make a change.

However, the DNA of many living things are very similar. Humans and apes have about 99% of the same DNA. Humans and horses have about 95%, I believe. Considering the amount of coding in a single strand of DNA....that is a lot of identical coding we share with those animals.