evolution

I think I've found some proof supporting macroevolution check out "Immunobiology" it writes about gain of function.

sorry for the double post.

Bardock> Ah, true that. It's entirley possible to live by the philosophy, that lack of proof doesn't mean something is impossible. SPirituality is impotant to quite a lot of people, and as long as religion stays away from politics and science I am a happy camper 🙂

See, we may be debating semantics. If I have two equally complicated theories, the one with the least assumptions to BEGIN with, would be the one science would choose according to Occam's razor. Do not make the mistake of thinking it's the simplicity of the actual theory...

Do you know how the Scientific Theory works? 🙂 Scientists first and foremost look for a HYPOTHESIS that explains something observed in nature. The hypothesis should also contain an element of prediction about the phenomena. Then it's time to test it. And the tests should be of such a nature, that other scientists should be able to copy it in their labs (or wherever they're making their experiments). Then - and only then - will it be called a scientific theory.

Again, it's not your job to disprove ANYTHING. The burden of proof rests on those making a postive assertion.

I wish to debate that evolution is a myth. I ask that you to bring sientific points that you think prove evolution and I will try and refute them. I am not a debator so hopefully I wont drop the ball. 😕

Let's try and be cool about this folks I am not interested in bashing anyone or seeing anyone else being bashed in this thread.

Note: This is not about the existence of God as some evolutionists beleive in God.

the fact that you have to get a new flu shot every year is perfectly good evidence.

lmao

Originally posted by Darth Jello
the fact that you have to get a new flu shot every year is perfectly good evidence.

Damnit, I said that like 800 pages back! You bastard!

You killed Kenny.

We have a Kenny?

Comical reference to make sure he doesn't actually think I'm calling him a bastard seriously.

It's joketastic

Oh, I was going with it. I was just prompting a Kenny to pop up and go "WTF?"

Damnit! Then I ****ed it up. Sometimes I'm right on the money, and sometimes, just sometimes, I'm that kid with the helmet in the back of the bus.

If you "believe" in Creationism, the missing link could walk up to you and introduce its self, and you would still never believe in evolution. Believing in something closes the door to other things. Because if you suddenly believed Creationism was incorrect, then the house of cards that is Christianity falls to the ground.

Originally posted by Arachnoidfreak
Damnit! Then I ****ed it up. Sometimes I'm right on the money, and sometimes, just sometimes, I'm that kid with the helmet in the back of the bus.

But which bus? lol

Originally posted by MARCMAN
I wish to debate that evolution is a myth. I ask that you to bring sientific points that you think prove evolution and I will try and refute them. I am not a debator so hopefully I wont drop the ball. 😕

Let's try and be cool about this folks I am not interested in bashing anyone or seeing anyone else being bashed in this thread.

Note: This is not about the existence of God as some evolutionists beleive in God.

Good luck.

Originally posted by Janus Marius
But which bus? lol

That short yellow cheese one.

Tart cart? Who knew?

I didn't ❌

Originally posted by Darth Jello
the fact that you have to get a new flu shot every year is perfectly good evidence.

cheers!

No takers?

of course if no one is willing to be open minded enough to change their stance in the face of evidence then there was no point in 147 pages of 'discussion'.

Originally posted by MARCMAN
No takers?

of course if no one is willing to be open minded enough to change their stance in the face of evidence then there was no point in 147 pages of 'discussion'.

Well, that's the thing. That you are looking to disprove evolution by refuting the evidence. That is what has been going on in those 147 pages. Or proving it. Or just discussing it. I imagine for success you would post your view, fact, your evidence, then people will post why they agree, disagree. It's not that people aren't interested, but plenty would feel no need to repost something from page 17 unless you posted something that called for the reposting.

But just wait, this thread is eternal, it will liven up again soon, of that I am sure.

Great point I S.

That is the challenge for a newbie to KMC like me. I really like talking about this but this thread has been going on for a long time already and for me to be up to speed I'd have to read 147 pages. I'd love to chat with you guys but I guess I just do not have time to read that many pages.

I have seen many debates of this kind and either side almost never change their tune...but one can always try and hope