evolution

Girl - I want to add for your httgspco's, links should go to decent sites, not some personal angelfire site or such

i think evolution is false, all the proof i need is in the bible. You can't change my mind.

Yers> Right on. Links should of course not go to some personal "I talk in tongues with God on Fridays" site... blrblrblrrr...
We should make a list of prerequisites from people before they'll be considered worthy...
(Nods solemnly)

you mean, what a site needs to fulfill in order to be accepted?
got that class once... in uni... nice subject, actually managed to pass it in one time, but can't remember how it all was, gonna look it up tomorrow

Alright...

1. Anything in the Bible the site tries to prove must include references outside of the Bible.
2. "I can feel God"/"I speak in tongues"/"I believe whatever the Bible tells me" is not a valid argument.
3. The site cannot be a personal webpage, especially one that uses a free server rather than a legitimate domain name.
4. The site must have at least one or two references to other websites/books/articles, which must also follow rules 1-3. (it cannot be the only site on the web that claims something)

🙂

Yeah. TF once pointed us at some wacko Christian site, with peculiar self-proclaimed scientists (who turned out NOt to be), still milling around some discovery from the 1930's...
Man, that was fun tearing apart.

UNI-sites would be okay. News-sites, ok, NASA/ESA sites and stuff like that. ✅

Darth>
Mwhahahha! What thread is that with some Fiery Eyes, whose reasoning is “The Bible is the word of God because it is the word of God because God leads you”?

you forgot some 😉

the author of the website must be known (to see if he is "famous" and works independant, etc.)
the URL can't take an obvious side: "religiousnuts.com" ie, is out of the question
the organization for which the author wrote it, if any, should be clearly stated plus a reason why
there should be more than one reference outside of the bible (so, that's: at least two!) and pointing to DIFFERENT books
etc.

Originally posted by yerssot
the URL can't take an obvious side: "religiousnuts.com" ie, is out of the question

Originally posted by The Omega
Darth>Mwhahahha! What thread is that with some Fiery Eyes, whose reasoning is “The Bible is the word of God because it is the word of God because God leads you”?

I don't remember, she repeats the same thing in all the religion threads anyways ✅

Yeah - I noticed. Must be some new answering maschine. Maybe it's one of those chat-room AI's sent out by religiousnuts.com?

I checked, the site does exist, but not in the way you would expect it

yerssot> 😆 😆

😑
It does...
🤣
Okay, maybe THIS http://www.angry.net/groups/r/religious_nuts.htm ?
Followed by http://www.staycatholic.com/religious_nuts.htm

exactly... a site called "staycatholic.com" is definitly off the list

Yers> Yes, it's off. But go to the two sites up there ... in that order ... and have a laugh! 🙂

I never joke about my work double oh TO 😉 but it was entertaining

...blowup... i said i dont want to hear all this crap. i know my beliefs, and i dont need a website.

One could actually start a new thread...
"Insultingly Stupid Internet Sites"? 🙂

oh, I could make such a nasty reply to that TO, but that would get me into trouble 😂

With whom?