evolution

"Since he was black"! What's that suppose to mean?

Originally posted by powerfulone1987
"Since he was black"! What's that suppose to mean?

It means, around the twenties or thirties, the mentality of people wouldn't let the thought of black equality enter their mind. Even though the arena they were speaking of had a black person dominating it.

Oh, my fault, ignorance on my part, sorry.

No problem, Stormy. 😄

The link is a lying b!tch, to put it bluntly. The idea of "social Darwinism" was NOT supported by Darwin himself. He didn't even come up with it.

Originally posted by Darth Revan
😆

tbh i got that from calvin and hobbes 😮

nah i dont believe in evolution at all 😄 im still pretty sure we're an experiment 🙂

Originally posted by Darth Revan
The link is a lying b!tch, to put it bluntly. The idea of "social Darwinism" was NOT supported by Darwin himself. He didn't even come up with it.

Prove it. And Darwin DID support it. This was the general stigma placed on Blacks during the mid 1800's to the late 20th century.

you can't prove a negative, so it's YOU that have to proof something here

If you supported the theory of evolution in Bradford you could end up dead 😬

Incidentally, does the going Mankind theory follow the straight out of Africa or the eventually out of Africa theory?

Originally posted by shaber
If you supported the theory of evolution in Bradford you could end up dead 😬

Incidentally, does the going Mankind theory follow the straight out of Africa or the eventually out of Africa theory?

Straight outta Africa!
a crazy mutha f*cka named D-Double
you don't like me
well then see trouble
😆
(where the hell did that come from?)

And Darwin DID support it. This was the general stigma placed on Blacks during the mid 1800's to the late 20th century.

Thank you, finti.

Sonofasaiyan> YOU are the one making a positive assertion “Darwin supported social darwinism”. Hence the burden of proof lies on YOUR shoulders.
You can’t prove a negative or do I HAVE to whip out the flying rein-deer for the giga-zillionth time????

Here http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/origin.html "The Origin of Species" for you to read, and show us, where Darwin did as you claim...
I'm waiting.

that's what I said TO... :

Originally posted by yerssot
you can't prove a negative, so it's YOU that have to proof something here

I just didn't use the flying reindeer explanation cause I figure it's by this time already copyrighted by you 😉

so is the missing link supposed to have emerged from or remained in Africa?

so is the missing link supposed to have emerged from or remained in Africa?

Wait, I never heard the flying reindeer explination.

Pretend I'm a creationist The Omega, and enlighten me.

Originally posted by The Omega
Sonofasaiyan> YOU are the one making a positive assertion “Darwin supported social darwinism”. Hence the burden of proof lies on YOUR shoulders.
You can’t prove a negative or do I HAVE to whip out the flying rein-deer for the giga-zillionth time????

Here http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/origin.html "The Origin of Species" for you to read, and show us, where Darwin did as you claim...
I'm waiting.

just because your idea is taken too far, doesn't mean ur to blame. what ppl did with Darwin's ideas was horrible. Darwin was not to blame, it's the idiots that warped his context

But that makes him and his theory no less accountable. Intent is not a factor here, whether his were good or bad.